Political Mathematics: Subtraction By Addition

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,287
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
In math, when you add two finite numbers, you can divide the sum to get the average between them. In politics, add two opposites and the result is often the worse of the two originals.



1.Since Democrats and their state media lie about everything, the claims of compromise are rarely that. Take the Clinton claim about abortion: Then, it was 'abortion should be safe, legal, and rare.

“Democratic politicians used to say abortions should be rare. Here’s how that changed…. By 2016, Hillary Clinton had changed her message, saying only that abortion should be “safe and legal.” https://www.vox.com/2019/10/18/20917406/abortion-safe-legal-and-rare-tulsi-gabbard

Now, Pelosi is in tears that the Texas law may save even one baby’s life.



2. But today’s polemic is about the huge mistake both sides made about Communist China. FDR, pro-communist, helped create it, and Nixon anti-communist, gave it entrée into the world economy.
The result: our most dangerous enemy.




3. Let’s begin by naming Communist China as our most dangerous enemy There are two understandings necessary: the first is China’s ultimate goal and belief that China’s rightful place is in the position of leader of the world, and to gain that position requires the destruction of the United States. Second, China will lie at every opportunity about accommodation with the West.



4. FDR allowed his inamorata, Stalin, materials and technology to built an atomic bomb. The result was Stalin’s auspices in a Korean War.

Major George Racey Jordan was in charge of expediting materials to the USSR during WWII. He testified before Congress that materials and instructions to build that atomic bomb were sent. Jordan had proof that the orders he received from the White House insisted that everything requested be sent....priority! Even ahead of material the US army needed.

And the result, a disaster for America. On April 5, 1951, Judge Irving R. Kaufman sentenced the Rosenbergs to death for theft of atomic secrets, and, resulted in "the communist aggression in Korea, with the resultant casualties exceeding 50,000 and who knows but that millions more of innocent people may pay the price of your treason." Judge Kaufman's Sentencing Statement in the Rosenberg Case


It is clear today, based on archival evidence, unearthed by researchers in Russia and released in the United States, that Kaufman was correct. "Absent an atomic bomb, Stalin would not have released Pyongyang's army to conquer the entire Korean peninsula. Confident that his possession of atomic weapons neutralized America's strategic advantage, Stalin was emboldened to unleash war in Korea in 1950." Haynes, Klehr, and
Vassiliev, "Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America," p. 143, 545. And Romerstein and Breindel,"The Venona Secrets," p. xv, 253.



5 Liberals should have loved Richard Nixon.

The Nixon administration gives stark acknowledgement that 'Republican" is not the same as 'conservative.' Nixon, rather than adhering to 'limited government,' presided over a regulatory revolution from '70 to '74 that included OSHA, The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the EPA, the United States Environmental Protection Agency

"The Supreme Court's decision in Griggs v Duke Power in 1971, followed by congressional legislation in 1972 gave the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) expanded authority to oversee employers employment practices. Combined, OSHA, the EPA, and the EEOC affected virtually every workplace. It was also during the Nixon years that the slope of federal spending on social and economic programs turned sharply upward." Charles Murray, "By The People," p.6.
gus
And we see today how bo their charges against Nixon were, as they ignored Obama's spying on the opposition.



6. A ‘big government Republican Nixon….a RINO.

And Richard Nixon was far, far more the civil rights warrior than the Democrat Party.
And, like so many on the Left, he did not understand the only way of dealing with the Left. And he invited China into the world community in the hopes they would change.


The lesson?
No aid should be given to any entity that cannot first prove it’s values copacetic with Western values.

By adding the mistaken efforts of both parties, world peace and stability has been subtracted.
 
Why is it that none of you on the Left can post a substantive refutation of the truth that hurts you so mightily?
IQ?
Lack of Education?
Mental Deficiency?
Addiction?

Fear of your masters?

"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Coulter


How about you actually try to grapple with the post that upset you so?
 
7. In this post, an indication that the views of the Chinese Communists have never changed.


”The Chinese Communist Party was founded in 1921 as a branch of Lenin’s Communist International- the center of a worldwide movement to overthrow capitalist nations and replace them with socialist ones based on…the concepts of Marxism-Leninism.

Mao Zedong brought Soviet-origin Communism to power in China founding the People’s Republic of China in 1949. He immediately aligned his regime with the Soviet Union…”
Gertz, “Deceiving The Sky,” p.19

Mao accomplished the greatest amount of slaughter in history.
Obama put a Mao ornament on the White House Christmas Tree.



Just below, you will see that that attitude toward slaughter remains.....aimed at America.




8. FDR’s error was ideological….he embraced Soviet Communism.

Nixon’s was the belief that Mao's China would change. Here’s proof that they haven’t:

"GeneralChi Haotian is ageneralof thePeople's Liberation Army." Chi Haotian - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
a. "The following is the actual text of a speech delivered in December, 2005 by Comrade Chi Haotian the Vice-Chairman of China's Military Commission to top officers and generals. Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceitful and covert warfare against its enemies.... It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight....We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from ... Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves.... It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century,..." Speech by Comrade Chi Haotian Vice-Chairman of China s Military Commission
 
9. China was engaged in a civil war, between Mao’s Communists, and Chiang Kai-Shek’s nationalists. FDR’s administration saw to it that Mao won.

FDR's insistence on permitting the Soviet agents who infiltrated his administration resulted in the United States sabotage of Chaing Kai-Shek and the Nationalists in China in favor of the Mao and the Communists. From the book “Blacklisted From History,” by M. Stanton Evans: Soviet agents in the U.S. State department (and Treasury) worked actively to damage confidence of our government, in the (Nationalist) Chinese fighting in their own country, as our allies against the Japanese, and in favor of the Communist insurgency of Mao Tse-Tung and Chou En-Lai.

While Chiang Kai-Shek was busy as our ally fighting the Japanese, Soviet spies White, Currie, Coe, Glasser, and Hiss were doing all they could to undermine him in favor of Mao and the communists.


“Another example of [Harry Dexter] White acting as an agent of influence for the Soviet Union was his obstruction of a proposed $200 million loan to Nationalist China in 1943, which he had been officially instructed to execute,[52] at a time when inflation was spiraling out of control.”
Harry Dexter White - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[Owen] Lattimore was leaking information to the Soviets while he was an advisor to Chiang Kai-shek and that the Soviets considered Lattimore to be "working for them". Freedom of Information/Privacy Act — FBI
 
When humanity turns its back on social conservatism and religion will it be evidence that your God isn't real or will it just be because Satan won?
 
Why is it that none of you on the Left can post a substantive refutation of the truth that hurts you so mightily?
IQ?
Lack of Education?
Mental Deficiency?
Addiction?

Fear of your masters?

"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Coulter


How about you actually try to grapple with the post that upset you so?
306 is more than 232, right? Who got 306....who got 232?

Well...Jumbo....did you back a loser? Do you continue to say that you're "always right"?

he he he
 
306 is more than 232, right? Who got 306....who got 232?

Well...Jumbo....did you back a loser? Do you continue to say that you're "always right"?

he he he

Why is it that none of you on the Left can post a substantive refutation of the truth that hurts you so mightily?
IQ?
Lack of Education?
Mental Deficiency?
Addiction?

Fear of your masters?

"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Coulter


How about you actually try to grapple with the post that upset you so?
 
306=Biden winner
230=Your Fellow Blob loser.

All the arithmetic you need to know.

Please try to convince us something else matters, Jumbo.
 
10. Pick one: The Soviet Union....or Iran.....or Communist China.

Every one of those exists today due to the support of the Democrat Party.



For example: The spies that FDR put in place continued to move Democrats in the Communist Direction. This, from a newspaper at the time:

"Mr. Truman said that the nationalists should have surrendered because they didn't have a chance to win...the opinion of American ambassador Leighton Stuart was that the failure of American aid to come at the opportune moment was the real cause of the weakness of nationalists and the disintegration of their armies....many military commanders went over to the enemy because they saw the United States withdrawing moral support from Chiang Kai-shek.
Mr. Truman boldly defends what Treasury did. He doesn't mention Harry Dexter White, mentioned in congressional hearings as a communist spy, sat at Treasury with full power to say when the money promised Chiang Kai-shek would be forwarded or withheld."
Toledo Blade, Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search


The world would be better today, and more human beings would be alive today, had none of those three entities survived.....

....yet, in this very thread, we have a dunce who couldn't be more pleased with that party....even viewing today's headlines about Afghanistan.


Amazing.
 
11. FDR was but one Democrat who made communist China a world power.



“Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology

As president, Bill Clinton essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the U.S. had by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the People’s Republic of China.

That “administration’s voluntary release of all the secrets of America’s nuclear tests, combined with the systematic theft of the secrets that were left as a result of its lax security controls, effectively wiped out America’s technological edge,” David Horowitz writes in the recently published, The Black Book of the American Left Volume 7: The Left in Power: Clinton to Obama.

“One of the key technological breaks China received, without having to spy to get it, was the deliverance of supercomputers once banned from export for security reasons,” writes Horowitz.

“Supercomputers underpin the technology of nuclear and missile warfare, and not only for firing and controlling the missiles. A supercomputer can simulate a nuclear test and is thus crucial to the development of nuclear warheads. But, according to a Washington Post editorial: ‘In the first three quarters of 1998 nine times as many [supercomputers] were exported [to China] as during the previous seven years.’”

.... helped a company called Loral Space get seats on official trade missions. He reportedly convinced the Clinton administration to overrule national security officials in order win approval for a Loral deal that gave Red China critical missile technology. Loral’s chief executive officer became the Democratic National Committee’s largest donor ...."
Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology




And the reason for selling out America?

Communist China helped fund the Clinton election campaign.
 
Why is it that none of you on the Left can post a substantive refutation of the truth that hurts you so mightily?
IQ?
Lack of Education?
Mental Deficiency?
Addiction?

Fear of your masters?

"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"
Coulter


How about you actually try to grapple with the post that upset you so?
More important things to do?

Anyway, I think you over do the threat of China. I see them as a balloon, they are fine so long as their economy can grow at the rates it has been growing (don't they know socialism doesn't work?). That is impossible so I expect they will implode like the USSR.
 
12. How many times does the Democrat Party aid and support the murderous Communist Chinese regime before it is not considered a ‘coincidence’?





"Under Obama, American security was damaged by ignoring and then covering up China's massive theft of American technology. Abroad, inaction by Obama facilitated the Chinese domination over the strategic South China Sea. After claiming 3,200 acres of new islands, China deployed advanced anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles on the island in what the CIA described as China's Crimea, a stealth take-over similar to the Russian annexation of Ukraine's peninsula in 2014."
Bill Gertz, “Deceiving the Sky: Inside Communist China's Drive for Global Supremacy,” p. 6





"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China

In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.
 
13. Of the many forces who found it necessary to unseat Trump, were those who counted on the riches China could provide them.

Personal wealth, and the corporation’s bottom line have become all that matter. And Communist China has been able to provide same.



“…Chinese Communist Party became their source of power, wealth, and prestige. Why did they trade with an authoritarian regime and send millions of American manufacturing jobs off to China thereby impoverish working Americans? Because it made them rich…. And besides, the American workers hurt by the deal deserved to be punished—who could defend a class of reactionary and racist ideological naysayers standing in the way of what was best for progress?”
The Thirty Tyrants
 

Forum List

Back
Top