Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Police should never open fire on white people unless they're shot at first.
Problem solved
Police should carry only non lethal devices.The police are not just shooting unarmed Blacks, beating elderly, and Latinos, but also shooting white teens (John Albers), who committed no crime other than backing slowly out of their own driveway.
He did not even know police were in his driveway and he had done nothing wrong.
Overland Park says investigation of teen’s 2018 fatal police shooting will be released
In January 2018, John Albers was shot six times by a former Overland Park officer after police were called to the family home to check on the teenager’s well being.www.yahoo.com
Overland Park releases report on fatal police shooting of John Albers, 17
The report includes hours of video and a 498-page summary.www.kmbc.com
{...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —
Overland Park released a redacted report Thursday on the fatal police shooting of 17-year-old John Albers in 2018.
...
He was slowky backing the family van out of the driveway when the officer opened fire.
A month later, Johnson County Prosecutor Steve Howe announced that the shooting was justified after a multi-jurisdictional investigation concluded because the officer reasonably feared for his life.
...
Albers was shot 13 times.
...}
As long as there are dangerous people on our streets, the response to this inane post is a definite, NO!The police are not just shooting unarmed Blacks, beating elderly, and Latinos, but also shooting white teens (John Albers), who committed no crime other than backing slowly out of their own driveway.
He did not even know police were in his driveway and he had done nothing wrong.
Overland Park says investigation of teen’s 2018 fatal police shooting will be released
In January 2018, John Albers was shot six times by a former Overland Park officer after police were called to the family home to check on the teenager’s well being.Overland Park releases report on fatal police shooting of John Albers, 17
The report includes hours of video and a 498-page summary.
{...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —
Overland Park released a redacted report Thursday on the fatal police shooting of 17-year-old John Albers in 2018.
...
He was slowky backing the family van out of the driveway when the officer opened fire.
A month later, Johnson County Prosecutor Steve Howe announced that the shooting was justified after a multi-jurisdictional investigation concluded because the officer reasonably feared for his life.
...
Albers was shot 13 times.
...}
I'm pretty sure that's part of the manual.Police should never open fire on white people unless they're shot at first.
Problem solved
Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Gangbangers are created by the police, with their illegal War on Drugs.
Police only have authority to defend the rights of others, and since drugs do not harm others, the police have no authority to enforce drug laws.
The harm comes from the high price, loads of cash, and turf wars created by the police.
So this 17 year old person was in his home minding his own business and a police officer decided to shoot him for no resson?The police are not just shooting unarmed Blacks, beating elderly, and Latinos, but also shooting white teens (John Albers), who committed no crime other than backing slowly out of their own driveway.
He did not even know police were in his driveway and he had done nothing wrong.
Overland Park says investigation of teen’s 2018 fatal police shooting will be released
In January 2018, John Albers was shot six times by a former Overland Park officer after police were called to the family home to check on the teenager’s well being.Overland Park releases report on fatal police shooting of John Albers, 17
The report includes hours of video and a 498-page summary.
{...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —
Overland Park released a redacted report Thursday on the fatal police shooting of 17-year-old John Albers in 2018.
...
He was slowky backing the family van out of the driveway when the officer opened fire.
A month later, Johnson County Prosecutor Steve Howe announced that the shooting was justified after a multi-jurisdictional investigation concluded because the officer reasonably feared for his life.
...
Albers was shot 13 times.
...}
is that tour story?
Really?
"Rogue cops" You mean the ones that get the job done!Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Wrong. Here is my solution. Start by building a better relationship between the community and law enforcement. Take steps necessary to remove rogue cops from the job and demonstrate that they will not be allowed to disgrace the shield. Start punishing people more severely for attacks on law enforcement showing the department that someone has their backs. Until this community/law enforcement schism is bridged, nothing will change.
Drugs not harmful? BWAHAHAHA!!!!! Tell that to the scores of ER physicians and nurses who have to deal with that shit every day!!!! and BTW, where were you when prohibition was going on? Or how about the organized crime families that existed well before the War on Drugs?Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Gangbangers are created by the police, with their illegal War on Drugs.
Police only have authority to defend the rights of others, and since drugs do not harm others, the police have no authority to enforce drug laws.
The harm comes from the high price, loads of cash, and turf wars created by the police.
SAY WHAT?Police essentially did not exist at all before 1900 or so, and we did fine.
Police seem to feel authorized to shoot more than average people, which is illegal.
Average people armed would not have shot.
So we would be much better off without armed police and with armed average citizens instead.
Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Gangbangers are created by the police, with their illegal War on Drugs.
Police only have authority to defend the rights of others, and since drugs do not harm others, the police have no authority to enforce drug laws.
The harm comes from the high price, loads of cash, and turf wars created by the police.
The first drug law was passed under Woodrow Wilson. Guess when you say the war against drugs is illegal, you are indicting Democrats.
The cops are periodically targets by dangerous individuals. They've been murdered while pulling people over for traffic violations, deadly ambushes against cops have occurred.As long as there are dangerous people on our streets, the response to this inane post is a definite, NO!The police are not just shooting unarmed Blacks, beating elderly, and Latinos, but also shooting white teens (John Albers), who committed no crime other than backing slowly out of their own driveway.
He did not even know police were in his driveway and he had done nothing wrong.
Overland Park says investigation of teen’s 2018 fatal police shooting will be released
In January 2018, John Albers was shot six times by a former Overland Park officer after police were called to the family home to check on the teenager’s well being.Overland Park releases report on fatal police shooting of John Albers, 17
The report includes hours of video and a 498-page summary.
{...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —
Overland Park released a redacted report Thursday on the fatal police shooting of 17-year-old John Albers in 2018.
...
He was slowky backing the family van out of the driveway when the officer opened fire.
A month later, Johnson County Prosecutor Steve Howe announced that the shooting was justified after a multi-jurisdictional investigation concluded because the officer reasonably feared for his life.
...
Albers was shot 13 times.
...}
Why?
The police are never the target of these dangerous people, so then why should police care if they are armed or not?
All the police have to do is step aside and write down the license plate number, get a description, call in other units, etc.
They NEVER need to shoot.
The answer is in addressing the problems of attitude and upbringing for those who hate law enforcement.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
Drugs not harmful? BWAHAHAHA!!!!! Tell that to the scores of ER physicians and nurses who have to deal with that shit every day!!!! and BTW, where were you when prohibition was going on? Or how about the organized crime families that existed well before the War on Drugs?Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Gangbangers are created by the police, with their illegal War on Drugs.
Police only have authority to defend the rights of others, and since drugs do not harm others, the police have no authority to enforce drug laws.
The harm comes from the high price, loads of cash, and turf wars created by the police.
WTF? Law enforcement wasn’t invented until 1900? Where the hell do you learn this stupid shit.Police essentially did not exist at all before 1900 or so, and we did fine.
Police seem to feel authorized to shoot more than average people, which is illegal.
Average people armed would not have shot.
So we would be much better off without armed police and with armed average citizens instead.
SAY WHAT?Police essentially did not exist at all before 1900 or so, and we did fine.
Police seem to feel authorized to shoot more than average people, which is illegal.
Average people armed would not have shot.
So we would be much better off without armed police and with armed average citizens instead.
Ummmm...You are so wrong that it ain't even funny. Not only did we have law enforcement---our law enforcement was expected to kill criminals that didnt' want to be arrested.
Bass Reeves - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The cops are periodically targets by dangerous individuals. They've been murdered while pulling people over for traffic violations, deadly ambushes against cops have occurred.As long as there are dangerous people on our streets, the response to this inane post is a definite, NO!The police are not just shooting unarmed Blacks, beating elderly, and Latinos, but also shooting white teens (John Albers), who committed no crime other than backing slowly out of their own driveway.
He did not even know police were in his driveway and he had done nothing wrong.
Overland Park says investigation of teen’s 2018 fatal police shooting will be released
In January 2018, John Albers was shot six times by a former Overland Park officer after police were called to the family home to check on the teenager’s well being.Overland Park releases report on fatal police shooting of John Albers, 17
The report includes hours of video and a 498-page summary.
{...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —
Overland Park released a redacted report Thursday on the fatal police shooting of 17-year-old John Albers in 2018.
...
He was slowky backing the family van out of the driveway when the officer opened fire.
A month later, Johnson County Prosecutor Steve Howe announced that the shooting was justified after a multi-jurisdictional investigation concluded because the officer reasonably feared for his life.
...
Albers was shot 13 times.
...}
Why?
The police are never the target of these dangerous people, so then why should police care if they are armed or not?
All the police have to do is step aside and write down the license plate number, get a description, call in other units, etc.
They NEVER need to shoot.
"Rogue cops" You mean the ones that get the job done!Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Wrong. Here is my solution. Start by building a better relationship between the community and law enforcement. Take steps necessary to remove rogue cops from the job and demonstrate that they will not be allowed to disgrace the shield. Start punishing people more severely for attacks on law enforcement showing the department that someone has their backs. Until this community/law enforcement schism is bridged, nothing will change.
Drugs not harmful to others?Drugs not harmful? BWAHAHAHA!!!!! Tell that to the scores of ER physicians and nurses who have to deal with that shit every day!!!! and BTW, where were you when prohibition was going on? Or how about the organized crime families that existed well before the War on Drugs?Sure it is. that and force cops to live in the warzones with their families' lives in danger from the gangbangers.So lessee. Only college grad peaheads and no ex military? oh sure. That'll work well with a bunch of hoodrats.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
That is not my solution at all.
Gangbangers are created by the police, with their illegal War on Drugs.
Police only have authority to defend the rights of others, and since drugs do not harm others, the police have no authority to enforce drug laws.
The harm comes from the high price, loads of cash, and turf wars created by the police.
I did not say drugs were not harmful, but that they were not harmful to others.
Its like trying to make suicide or stupidity illegal. That is not legal.
Anyway, making drugs illegal increases the problem instead of reducing it.
They are a medical problem and making it illegal just prevents medical solutions.
And yes, prohibition was also inherently illegal.
People have a right to consume alcohol if they want.
Crime families exist mostly because of government corruption.
When government does bad things, people will always support crime as a reaction.
The answer is in addressing the problems of attitude and upbringing for those who hate law enforcement.Disagreed with the premise. Police should not be disarmed. There needs to be many steps taken to improve the quality of law enforcement as well as their relationship to their communities. The country is in a vicious cycle that continues unabated. It goes something like this:
The wrong people become cops. Too many people hate law enforcement. Too many bad cops treat certain communities with the same scorn they receive because of their uniform. Politicians have no hesitation using bad tactics as a political prop. Less qualified people want to become police officers continuing this vicious cycle.
Disarming police officers does not resolve the underlying issues.
99% of interaction with law enforcement is due to bad behavior or law breaking.
you don't want cops, stop having laws that need enforcing.
No, that's where you are historically atrophied. Back in the bad old days of the gang wars of the 1970s and 80s. police, especially in NY and LA were horribly outgunned by the gangbangers by incredible margins. What happens when you have unarmed cops? You get DEAD cops. Sorry, but I feel better when a cop is packing heat.The cops are periodically targets by dangerous individuals. They've been murdered while pulling people over for traffic violations, deadly ambushes against cops have occurred.As long as there are dangerous people on our streets, the response to this inane post is a definite, NO!The police are not just shooting unarmed Blacks, beating elderly, and Latinos, but also shooting white teens (John Albers), who committed no crime other than backing slowly out of their own driveway.
He did not even know police were in his driveway and he had done nothing wrong.
Overland Park says investigation of teen’s 2018 fatal police shooting will be released
In January 2018, John Albers was shot six times by a former Overland Park officer after police were called to the family home to check on the teenager’s well being.Overland Park releases report on fatal police shooting of John Albers, 17
The report includes hours of video and a 498-page summary.
{...
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —
Overland Park released a redacted report Thursday on the fatal police shooting of 17-year-old John Albers in 2018.
...
He was slowky backing the family van out of the driveway when the officer opened fire.
A month later, Johnson County Prosecutor Steve Howe announced that the shooting was justified after a multi-jurisdictional investigation concluded because the officer reasonably feared for his life.
...
Albers was shot 13 times.
...}
Why?
The police are never the target of these dangerous people, so then why should police care if they are armed or not?
All the police have to do is step aside and write down the license plate number, get a description, call in other units, etc.
They NEVER need to shoot.
Once or twice, compared to the thousands of innocents murdered by police.
When police are to quick to shoot, then shooting police is justified in self defense.
Unarmed police likely would never be shot at.
