Police order canine to rip off man's face for burning trash in barrel (entered home without warrant)

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

 

[timslash]

Without warrant cop should seat in his car eating donuts, not trying to arrest people for such stupid "crimes!"
And also, why adult man(who was specially trained to arrest dangerous thugs) can't arrest without help of dog?!

Man maybe have gun. Gun kill. Cop want to eat more donut.

Keyword is "Maybe" because when cop think that person have a gun, it should be a hundred percent sure that suspect REALLY have a gun, only after that he can use forces!

 

[chikenwing]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

Why do people think cops can do what ever they want when ever they want,this absolute authority is bull shit,and letting the dog chew on the guy after they all where on him is inexcusable,thinking other wise is just so wrong.
The guy was in his house HIS HOUSE

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

Why do people think cops can do what ever they want when ever they want,this absolute authority is bull shit,and letting the dog chew on the guy after they all where on him is inexcusable,thinking other wise is just so wrong.
The guy was in his house HIS HOUSE

Evidently he was breaking a law, all he had to do was cooperate, he chose not to and paid the price

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

Why do people think cops can do what ever they want when ever they want,this absolute authority is bull shit,and letting the dog chew on the guy after they all where on him is inexcusable,thinking other wise is just so wrong.
The guy was in his house HIS HOUSE

We don't know it was his house. Most of these losers live with Mommy. And the police had probable cause to enter. You set up a meth lab in your back yard, the cops will be kicking in your door too and sending a K9 to masticate your stupid face.

 

[chikenwing]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

Why do people think cops can do what ever they want when ever they want,this absolute authority is bull shit,and letting the dog chew on the guy after they all where on him is inexcusable,thinking other wise is just so wrong.
The guy was in his house HIS HOUSE

We don't know it was his house. Most of these losers live with Mommy. And the police had probable cause to enter. You set up a meth lab in your back yard, the cops will be kicking in your door too and sending a K9 to masticate your stupid face.

Well if you say so,but nice try,was it the cops house? yours?
Was the guy cooking meth? didn't look like it now did it.
Just another authoritarian,that hates to hear the word no,that has no problem with over the top police response.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Was the guy cooking meth? Let's just call it an educated guess.

 

[Ravi]

Was the guy cooking meth? Let's just call it an educated guess.

No, he'd been trying to burn down his neighbor's house and apparently had threatened to stab the neighbor.

That still doesn't excuse what the cops did.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

Why do people think cops can do what ever they want when ever they want,this absolute authority is bull shit,and letting the dog chew on the guy after they all where on him is inexcusable,thinking other wise is just so wrong.
The guy was in his house HIS HOUSE

We don't know it was his house. Most of these losers live with Mommy. And the police had probable cause to enter. You set up a meth lab in your back yard, the cops will be kicking in your door too and sending a K9 to masticate your stupid face.

Well if you say so,but nice try,was it the cops house? yours?
Was the guy cooking meth? didn't look like it now did it.
Just another authoritarian,that hates to hear the word no,that has no problem with over the top police response.

Breaking the law is breaking the law, he should have cooperated and he wouldn't have been bit. Fact

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Was the guy cooking meth? Let's just call it an educated guess.

No, he'd been trying to burn down his neighbor's house and apparently had threatened to stab the neighbor.

That still doesn't excuse what the cops did.

You just made my case, skid mark.

 

[Jarlaxle]

He should have stood up when asked to. If he had he wouldn't have been attacked. Logic 101

Exactly. Why do cop haters keep citing police "abuse" where the suspect resists?

Why do people think cops can do what ever they want when ever they want,this absolute authority is bull shit,and letting the dog chew on the guy after they all where on him is inexcusable,thinking other wise is just so wrong.
The guy was in his house HIS HOUSE

We don't know it was his house. Most of these losers live with Mommy. And the police had probable cause to enter. You set up a meth lab in your back yard, the cops will be kicking in your door too and sending a K9 to masticate your stupid face.

When the cop tells you to start sucking, which of your knees hits the ground first?