🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE releases by @DNIGabbard - Declassified Evidence of Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert President Trump’s 2016 Victory

What will happen to Obama if found guilty?

  • Nothing

    Votes: 26 86.7%
  • It depends if Trump pardons him.

    Votes: 4 13.3%

  • Total voters
    30
Obviously you don’t know, the OP is clearly discussing a declassified report
The “declassified” report is about the unclassified ODNI report from 2017.

The ODNI report from 2017 is perfectly factual. There’s no scandal here.
 
I wonder how far this will go. Even if found guilty, I doubt if anything will happen to Obama. I think the exposure will be enough punishment.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard refers evidence to DOJ, says accountability is 'critical' for preserving American democracy​

Nope. If he truly did what is apparent, then life in prison is the only suitable conclusion.
 
can you explain

Yep, you won't answer because you damn well know the timing of this controversy was based entirely on the timing of Trump's DOJ releasing a memo that basicly said - NOTHING TO SEE HERE.

It's not "we are still investigating", it's "we looked it over and there is nothing left to rehash" - Epstein's death is well explained and there is no clients list to prosecute or publicize.

This timing was obviously not by Democrats somehow trying to counter-program Tusli's go-nowhere bullshit revisionism, it could only be the other way around - Tusli trying to feed red-meat to rightwing conspiracy wingnuts who are up in arms over Trump admin's handling of Epstein case.
 
Last edited:
7ea4ccde46fa9ab7e3a5cae0f56fd581a202d976cd08a0ca4de1b236fcc2620c.png

So you are saying Democrats DID cause Pam's DOJ to time their Epstein memo ahead of Tulsi's announcement?

...or are you just trying to show people how to make stupid posts with cats?
 
Clapper asking for an “assesment” of the suspicions is obviously not the same thing as dictating the expected outcome.
Yeah, when the boss doesn't like your original report and asks you to do it again it's hard to figure out what's expected..

:coffee:

57.webp
 
The Mueller Report.

And


 
Last edited:
The “declassified” report is about the unclassified ODNI report from 2017.

The ODNI report from 2017 is perfectly factual. There’s no scandal here.
So have you read the declassified report? No

Ok then
 
I love that line. It's the kind of assertion made with a wry smile. Since, you know, in the annals of US history no elected official has evaded accountability as the Criminal-in-Chief has.
/---/ Do you know why the Court of Appeals is sitting on the case? So, to give you Libtard Moobats a talking point. Eventually the charges will be tossed out on appeal --- AND YOU DAMN WELL KNOW IT.
 
/---/ Do you know why the Court of Appeals is sitting on the case? So, to give you Libtard Moobats a talking point. Eventually the charges will be tossed out on appeal --- AND YOU DAMN WELL KNOW IT.
and despite any proof will simply become conspiracy theory in the court of public opinion ~S~
 
15th post
I love that line. It's the kind of assertion made with a wry smile. Since, you know, in the annals of US history no elected official has evaded accountability as the Criminal-in-Chief has.
Really did he need pardons for crime against the United States like Adam Shifty?? No? Gotcha
 
Why are you still commenting on a thread when you have no idea what it’s about?
Haha! You are too much!

I get it you didn’t read the declassified report and simply take issue with the conclusion

Not surprised you all have a history of not accepting by conclusions of investigations
 
Haha! You are too much!

I get it you didn’t read the declassified report and simply take issue with the conclusion

Not surprised you all have a history of not accepting by conclusions of investigations
Gabbard isn’t trustworthy. Her public comments and her “report” are gibberish aimed at low information voters like you.
 
Back
Top Bottom