Poland prepares plans to invade Belarus

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Russia is the weak man of Europe.

It can't defeat Ukraine.

 

[Silver Cat]

Uses nukes where or on who ?

Russia won't use nukes on Ukraine during "special military operation". They even won't use in the case of a "Local war". They will use it on European countries (first of all against Britain, France, Germany, Poland, Romania, Belgium and Italy) in the case of the "Regional war", and on the USA in the case of the "Large-scale war".

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Russia dies if it uses a tiny nuke, period.

 

[ESay]

Not sure, can you give me a link to that

Well it couldn't have been before the invasion, you are correct. Even so the assessments were being made before the massive effort by the west was totally known concerning it's committed efforts in the helping of Ukraine to stop the Russian occupation (for whatever reason the Russians had for occupying any of Ukrainian territories in that nation), after the so called special operation had gotten on it's way.

In the fall of 2022 and winter 2022/23 'massive efforts by the West' were already known and the Ritter's arguments, or at least how they were presented here, were quite laughable.

But that is the past. The main question is what the future brings. As long as 'helping Ukraine to stop the Russian occupation' is hardly achievable in this war.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Getting rid of Putin and walling off the west are the goals, comrade.

 

[luiza]

Getting rid of Putin and walling off the west are the goals, comrade.

Horsey , you are so funny . But when old people like yourself start constantly interjecting , but actually say nothing of consequence , onlookers smell loneliness and signs of weakening mental health .
Are you a lonely old chap just desperate for somebody to pay you some attention ? Sad but there are many just like you .
PM Winkle the Titty and Boozey . I think you could have some nice chats .

 

[Litwin]

Russia dies if it uses a tiny nuke, period.

 

[Silver Cat]

Russia dies if it uses a tiny nuke, period.

You may think so, but it's not official position of the US Government. At least because that strategy doesn't work.

And no, nobody speak about "a tiny nuke".

 

[Silver Cat]

Funny guys. They don't try to destroy bombers or fighters, they attack cargo planes, cheap and relatively harmless.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If a tiny nuke is used by Russia, the lowest level to end the strife is the complete blanketing Russia with American nuclear weapons. If one Russian escape, the plan went wrong. It will take a Daryl Dixon to find out what happened in the Rodina.

 

[Silver Cat]

If a tiny nuke is used by Russia, the lowest level to end the strife is the complete blanketing Russia with American nuclear weapons. If one Russian escape, the plan went wrong. It will take a Daryl Dixon to find out what happened in the Rodina.

Bla-bla-bla. The problem is that nowadays the USA just can't attack Russia and then lose after their retaliation less than 50 (or even 100) million citizens. And it means, that the USA won't attack the Russians whatever they do (including their limited counter-force nuclear attack on the UK and France), except direct attack on US nuclear forces.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The USA, France, Britain, Israel, and South Africa will attack Russia if it ever uses a nuke. If ever.

 

[xyz]

The USA, France, Britain, Israel, and South Africa will attack Russia if it ever uses a nuke. If ever.

Israel will not do anything if it is not in its own self-interest, and South Africa doesn't own nuclear weapons any more (and their president supports Russia).

But the UK and France certainly do have weapons ready to attack Russia.

 

[beagle9]

Russia is the weak man of Europe.

It can't defeat Ukraine.

So your opinion is that Russia will take the loss, and exit Ukraine in which opens to door to NATO expansion once all the dust settles ?

What about this then - In a possible peace agreement scenario, why don't the world leaders of NATO add a stipulation that might calm down the Russian giant, wherefore within the agreement, the agreement would read - Ukraine shall never become a member of NATO due to it's geographical positioning that might lead to the country of Russia fearing such an expansion of NATO within its spear and/or region of interest, otherwise for national world security reasons it shall not be pushed or allowed by the council to take place due to the volatile cultural dynamics that exist within the region, otherwise as is evidenced by the current situation taking place within that region now...... The denying of membership is to ensure that the sovereignty of global nation's within their regions are secure within their regions of interest or in their spears of influence without interference, so Ukraine shall not join at these times, but we as a NATO world military body of power, do require that Ukraine shall remain an independent nation neighbor state that will safely exist along side it's former Soviet Union nostalgic friend without further incident. We as a world military body of power will also work to help resolve the tensions by working with both nations peacefully to restore their much needed alliance's as being two independent nation's living next to each other within the region. We extend our hands to all involved.

Signed by all involved.

 

[beagle9]

Israel will not do anything if it is not in its own self-interest, and South Africa doesn't own nuclear weapons any more (and their president supports Russia).

But the UK and France certainly do have weapons ready to attack Russia.

True, but without Ukraine being a member of NATO, would the strike doctrine work to ignite a nuclear exchange that would endanger the entire world over anything happening with a non-member state ? Doesn't seem logical does it ? How on earth did the world get caught up in a conflict between Russia and Ukraine battling over I guess governance issues, trade issues, cultural and/or territorial disputes within that region ??

 

[beagle9]

The USA, France, Britain, Israel, and South Africa will attack Russia if it ever uses a nuke. If ever.

Uses a nuke against who ?

 

[rupol2000]

No "Belarus" exists. This is the region of the former Lithuania and the Polish lands occupied by Stalin in 1939. The Poles of Belarus are arming themselves and going against the dictator.
And Kalinowsky is a Polish hero-liberator.
Flag of the Kalinovsky regiment of the Polish palette.
there is no doubt that this is a Polish uprising.




The so-called "Belarusian" language is Polish, and the dictator never speaks it.

 

[Deadstick]

Israel will not do anything if it is not in its own self-interest, and South Africa doesn't own nuclear weapons any more (and their president supports Russia).

But the UK and France certainly do have weapons ready to attack Russia.

Yes and if they use them their countries will cease to exist.

 

[Deadstick]

No "Belarus" exists. This is the region of the former Lithuania and the Polish lands occupied by Stalin in 1939. The Poles of Belarus are arming themselves and going against the dictator.
And Kalinowsky is a Polish hero-liberator.
Flag of the Kalinovsky regiment of the Polish palette.
there is no doubt that this is a Polish uprising.




The so-called "Belarusian" language is Polish, and the dictator never speaks it.

A polish uprising in someone else's Country. good luck with that.

 

[rupol2000]

A polish uprising in someone else's Country. good luck with that.

There is no such "country". Belarusian Poles must be released. The Litvins who occupied them and stole their culture will be considered in court.