Planned Parenthood clinics did 327,653 abortions in its fiscal year 2014

[Carla_Danger]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

so to keep them from being killed or abused your solution is to kill them?.........

I don't believe removing a fetus is murder, neither does the Supreme Court.

 

[Newby]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

yeah, it's so much better to kill them before they get here! You people are a vicious bunch, aren't ya?

 

[Carla_Danger]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

yeah, it's so much better to kill them before they get here! You people are a vicious bunch, aren't ya?

Whatever you're doing to help unwanted children, if anything, is not enough.

 

[koshergrl]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

yeah, it's so much better to kill them before they get here! You people are a vicious bunch, aren't ya?

Only towards women and children.

 

[Newby]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

yeah, it's so much better to kill them before they get here! You people are a vicious bunch, aren't ya?

Whatever you're doing to help unwanted children, if anything, is not enough.

Whatever I'm doing is certainly better than killing them!

 

[S.J.]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

 

[Hollie]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

yeah, it's so much better to kill them before they get here! You people are a vicious bunch, aren't ya?

Whatever you're doing to help unwanted children, if anything, is not enough.

Whatever I'm doing is certainly better than killing them!

Thumping your bibles while trying to impose your partisan religious beliefs on others is doing nothing "better".

You out-of-the-madrassah and into-the-womb zealots have no meaningful recourse for unwanted pregnancy and many of you would want to ban abortion even if the pregnancy was a danger to the mothers' health.

Maybe a better solution would be a program of sterilization for men like you.

 

[PostmodernProph]

I don't believe removing a fetus is murder, neither does the Supreme Court.

didn't say murder.....I said kill......you can deny its murder, you can't deny its killing........

 

[PostmodernProph]

c
Thumping your bibles while trying to impose your partisan religious beliefs on others is doing nothing "better".

You out-of-the-madrassah and into-the-womb zealots have no meaningful recourse for unwanted pregnancy and many of you would want to ban abortion even if the pregnancy was a danger to the mothers' health.

Maybe a better solution would be a program of sterilization for men like you.

don't worry Holly.....when you get into high school you will learn a bit more about life and these complicated issues will be easier for you to understand.......

 

[Hollie]

Thumping your bibles while trying to impose your partisan religious beliefs on others is doing nothing "better".

You out-of-the-madrassah and into-the-womb zealots have no meaningful recourse for unwanted pregnancy and many of you would want to ban abortion even if the pregnancy was a danger to the mothers' health.

Maybe a better solution would be a program of sterilization for men like you.

don't worry Holly.....when you get into high school you will learn a bit more about life and these complicated issues will be easier for you to understand.......

It is indeed a complicated issue, which is why simplistic, absolutist views such as by you ignorant, hyper-religious loons are woefully inadequate.

Sorry, thumpie, but your extremist, fundamentalist views and your desire to impose them upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist, and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.

Only the impregnated female in consultation with her doctor has the right to determine her response to the impregnation during the first trimester of pregnancy despite the judgmental presumptions of those who would presume to usurp her inherent right. The State should not be allowed to exert authority to demand or deny abortion.

The fact that there cannot be a perfect solution does not dictate that we mindlessly leap to an absolutist proscription such as by a minority of religious extremists. As with most contested matters of adjudication, we are dealing with conflicting recognized rights: a woman to control her womb, a fetus to develop into an individual. Rowe vs Wade has delineated the specifics of such a compromise, recognizing as a superior matter of privacy the right of a woman to control a pregnancy before that zygote/embryo/fetus has become a viable entity, and granting that fetus a protected status once its development has reached a definitive stage. There is always a nebulous area in between that can be contested, but to legislate either one extremist position or the other is not an equitable approach.

Once again, a reasonable solution might be the sterilization of people like you thus reducing the possibility of unwanted pregnancy.

 

[Carla_Danger]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Thumping your bibles while trying to impose your partisan religious beliefs on others is doing nothing "better".

You out-of-the-madrassah and into-the-womb zealots have no meaningful recourse for unwanted pregnancy and many of you would want to ban abortion even if the pregnancy was a danger to the mothers' health.

Maybe a better solution would be a program of sterilization for men like you.

don't worry Holly.....when you get into high school you will learn a bit more about life and these complicated issues will be easier for you to understand.......

It is indeed a complicated issue, which is why simplistic, absolutist views such as by you ignorant, hyper-religious loons are woefully inadequate.

Sorry, thumpie, but your extremist, fundamentalist views and your desire to impose them upon others via state coercion is not the moral position of most Americans. If and when a fetus achieves a stage of development where it is sentient and viable, it is recognized as a person and entitled to legal protection. Before that stage, a person does not yet exist, and the State must respect the prerogatives of the individual upon whom the developing entity is dependent.

Only the impregnated female in consultation with her doctor has the right to determine her response to the impregnation during the first trimester of pregnancy despite the judgmental presumptions of those who would presume to usurp her inherent right. The State should not be allowed to exert authority to demand or deny abortion.

The fact that there cannot be a perfect solution does not dictate that we mindlessly leap to an absolutist proscription such as by a minority of religious extremists. As with most contested matters of adjudication, we are dealing with conflicting recognized rights: a woman to control her womb, a fetus to develop into an individual. Rowe vs Wade has delineated the specifics of such a compromise, recognizing as a superior matter of privacy the right of a woman to control a pregnancy before that zygote/embryo/fetus has become a viable entity, and granting that fetus a protected status once its development has reached a definitive stage. There is always a nebulous area in between that can be contested, but to legislate either one extremist position or the other is not an equitable approach.

Once again, a reasonable solution might be the sterilization of people like you thus reducing the possibility of unwanted pregnancy.

The authoritarianism and extremism, along with contempt for the privacy rights of others is typical among religious nutters. They can't seem to keep their noses out of other peoples crotches.

 

[S.J.]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

 

[Carla_Danger]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

There's no God, no heaven, no tooth fairy, and Bigfoot doesn't exist. When we die, we're like shit being flushed down a toilet. That's it. You better make the most of what you've got.

 

[S.J.]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

There's no God, no heaven, no tooth fairy, and Bigfoot doesn't exist. When we die, we're like shit being flushed down a toilet. That's it. You better make the most of what you've got.

That certainly would explain your calloused attitude toward the disposal of unwanted children. I'm glad you include yourself in that assessment because I sort of feel that way about you too.

 

[Carla_Danger]

What happens when 327,653 more children are born in homes that don't want them, can't afford to feed them, have serious drug problems, and have to rely on welfare? Also, many unwanted children end up being abused and even killed.



Authorities Girl 5 dead after being thrown off bridge by father

(Based on the hospitalization figures, Wachman and other researchers estimated that more than 1,300 Massachusetts babies — or about 17.5 per 1,000 hospital births— were born with narcotics in their system in 2013.)

Massachusetts infants born with opiates in system at three times national rate analysis finds - Nation - The Boston Globe

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

There's no God, no heaven, no tooth fairy, and Bigfoot doesn't exist. When we die, we're like shit being flushed down a toilet. That's it. You better make the most of what you've got.

That certainly would explain your calloused attitude toward the disposal of unwanted children. I'm glad you include yourself in that assessment because I sort of feel that way about you too.

I just prefer to keep my nose out of other peoples crotches. What goes on between a woman and her doctor is none of my business.

 

[S.J.]

The old "better off dead" argument, eh? And you're telling other people they're not going to heaven. Perfect.

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

There's no God, no heaven, no tooth fairy, and Bigfoot doesn't exist. When we die, we're like shit being flushed down a toilet. That's it. You better make the most of what you've got.

That certainly would explain your calloused attitude toward the disposal of unwanted children. I'm glad you include yourself in that assessment because I sort of feel that way about you too.

I just prefer to keep my nose out of other peoples crotches. What goes on between a woman and her doctor is none of my business.

Deflection and deception. You think killing is ok, then try to make it out to be a matter of privacy or crotches. No one is fooled by that bullshit.

 

[Votto]

And now to lighten the mood, how about some abortion jokes?

--------------------------------------------------------

Knock, knock.

Whose there?

You'll never know.


---------------------------------------------------------


Why did the unborn fetus cross the road?


They moved the dumpster across the road..

--------------------------------------------------------

A woman just had an abortion and was beginning to feel a little guilty for having one. To ease her guilt the doctor assured her that she had done the right thing by adding, "When we sucked the brain out there was hardly anything in there. The last thing we needed was another welfare case."

--------------------------------------------------------

Why do some women prefer abortion over contraception?

Abortions are free.

-----------------------------------------------------------

So this white upper middle class couple comes in for consultation for an abortion. However, upon ultrasound the doctor objected and told them that they are not allowed to have an abortion by law. Outraged the husband spoke up and demanded to know why they could not do an abortion. The doctor simply replied, "Dude, I don't know how to tell you this but that baby is not yours, he is Hispanic. You are not a bigot are you?"

 

[Carla_Danger]

Even if there were a heaven, you wouldn't be going.

I know of a young woman who had 4 children by the time she was 21. She's now 27 and has recently lost custody, and each of those children now belong to the court. More than likely, they will be shuffled through foster care until they reach 18. Never mind what they went through and saw during their first years of life with their mother and her drug problems.

The odds are against these children to ever have a normal life.

Then there was a (R) State Sen. Bruce Caswell who proposed a law to require foster kids only buy second-hand clothing. Might as well kick them when they're down, right? Well, that's not the half of it. RWingers also want to cut their SNAP benefits, so they'll have to go hungry.

I have an aunt and uncle who are foster parents and some of the kids they've fostered will never have a chance at a normal life.

I think that bringing children into that type of environment is more cruel than terminating a pregnancy.

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

There's no God, no heaven, no tooth fairy, and Bigfoot doesn't exist. When we die, we're like shit being flushed down a toilet. That's it. You better make the most of what you've got.

That certainly would explain your calloused attitude toward the disposal of unwanted children. I'm glad you include yourself in that assessment because I sort of feel that way about you too.

I just prefer to keep my nose out of other peoples crotches. What goes on between a woman and her doctor is none of my business.

Deflection and deception. You think killing is ok, then try to make it out to be a matter of privacy or crotches. No one is fooled by that bullshit.

You don't have the right to stomp on a woman's civil rights or force women to give birth against their will, thank goodness. You might as well get used to it, because that's the way it's going to stay.

 

[S.J.]

So, when did God put you in charge of deciding who goes to heaven and who doesn't. You've now told several people with whom you disagree that they're NOT going to heaven, as you advocate the killing of defenseless human beings (for their own good, of course). What arrogance.

There's no God, no heaven, no tooth fairy, and Bigfoot doesn't exist. When we die, we're like shit being flushed down a toilet. That's it. You better make the most of what you've got.

That certainly would explain your calloused attitude toward the disposal of unwanted children. I'm glad you include yourself in that assessment because I sort of feel that way about you too.

I just prefer to keep my nose out of other peoples crotches. What goes on between a woman and her doctor is none of my business.

Deflection and deception. You think killing is ok, then try to make it out to be a matter of privacy or crotches. No one is fooled by that bullshit.

You don't have the right to stomp on a woman's civil rights or force women to give birth against their will, thank goodness. You might as well get used to it, because that's the way it's going to stay.

Fine. I'm not the one who has to answer to a higher authority, you are.