Planned Parenthood awarded $2M in lawsuit against hidden camera activists . Poor Pro-life Morons!

[martybegan]

it will be overturned on appeal.

You keep telling yourself that... So they piss away millions paying lawyers instead of millions to PP... I'm good with that.

Everyone will know they lied by the time it is done.

Again, the only lying found actionable was how they got the interview, everything else was dropped.

how about some journalist trying to take down a tobacco company or a polluter? would you defend their right to privacy then?

 

[JoeB131]

Again, the only lying found actionable was how they got the interview, everything else was dropped.

how about some journalist trying to take down a tobacco company or a polluter? would you defend their right to privacy then?

Since pollution is illegal, no. Not sure how this would apply to a tobacco company.

Again, these guys lied about who they were, to get people to say stuff on camera they could take out of context to slander abortion providers...

Abortion is legal. Trespassing is not.

 

[martybegan]

Again, the only lying found actionable was how they got the interview, everything else was dropped.

how about some journalist trying to take down a tobacco company or a polluter? would you defend their right to privacy then?

Since pollution is illegal, no. Not sure how this would apply to a tobacco company.

Again, these guys lied about who they were, to get people to say stuff on camera they could take out of context to slander abortion providers...

Abortion is legal. Trespassing is not.

Nice line dancing there. Lying about who you are is essential to undercover reporting. So you are saying undercover reporting should be illegal.

and again, no actionable items were found with regards to the content of the exposes.

 

[JoeB131]

Nice line dancing there. Lying about who you are is essential to undercover reporting. So you are saying undercover reporting should be illegal.

and again, no actionable items were found with regards to the content of the exposes.

1) these guys weren't reporters.
2) Lying is never necessary to journalism...

 

[martybegan]

Nice line dancing there. Lying about who you are is essential to undercover reporting. So you are saying undercover reporting should be illegal.

and again, no actionable items were found with regards to the content of the exposes.

1) these guys weren't reporters.
2) Lying is never necessary to journalism...

1) they were investigating.
2) for undercover journalism it is.

 

[JoeB131]

1) they were investigating.
2) for undercover journalism it is.

Nope. Because they LIED about what happened. Lying isn't journalism.

 

[martybegan]

1) they were investigating.
2) for undercover journalism it is.

Nope. Because they LIED about what happened. Lying isn't journalism.

No, they didn't. That part of the case was dropped because editing isn't lying.

 

[Flash]

Only a confused world class Libtard asshole would refer to the movement to save the lives of a million American children each year as being moronic.

The baby killers hated to have their murderous operation exposed.

This is like if a reporter had been able to get into a Nazi concentration camp and take pictures of the genocide and a German court awarding damages to Hitler.