Dr. Robert R. Owens’ great piece titled When the Have Nots Become the Haves opens with this:
Substitute the words producers and parasites for the words “Haves” and “Have-Nots” and you’ll see that Alinsky conned everyone into believing that parasites would magically morph into producers after they seized power with Alinsky lies, doublespeak, misdirection, intimidation, violence and threats of violence.
Far from being the political genius Hillary Clinton swoons over, Alinsky did nothing more than write an instruction book for implementing Socialism/Communism. Following Alinsky’s instructions to a tee, the final stage of 19th century Socialism/Communism is being codified by Barack Taqiyya & Company.
Forget Alinsky for a minute. Socialism/Communism itself is so easily discredited I’m astonished at how far Socialists have come. Bear with me as I reach back in time to make my case.
Admittedly, attributing the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire to lead poisoning is only a theory:
Interpreting the decline and fall of the Roman Empire most often depended upon who was doing the interpreting. Priesthoods blamed it on a loss of morality. Military minds said that hiring mercenaries was responsible for the fall. Philosophical interpretations of anything always send up warning flares.
NOTE: American Socialists want our military to fight and die in foreign lands for philosophical reasons.
I place no faith in philosophical autopsies performed on long dead empires, but I am partial to lead poison explaining the decline and fall of the Roman Empire because it is a legitimate scientific inquiry searching for proof.
Except for the Roman Empire, empires in the ancient world usually disappeared because they were conquered. To me, the critical factor is that the Roman Empire was not conquered, but it did decline very rapidly because of lead poisoning.
The impoverished could not afford expensive lead-laden wines and food. Those Romans who governed the empire died off too quickly for the materially disadvantaged to govern a complex society, let alone hold onto a far-reaching empire. Put that in perspective by evaluating today’s Democrats and their contribution to America’s shrinking worldwide political empire. Democrats are the ones who wailed that America was losing respect in the world under Bush, yet philosophical “respect” pales in comparison to the real losses America’s foreign policy is causing under Socialism.
Also, I recall reading that the lead poisoning theory was strengthened by examining the skeletal remains of those Romans who died before, during, and after the Empire’s period of rapid decline. The graves of those Romans who were solvent on the day they checked out yielded an extraordinary number of skeletons whose original owners had died from lead poisoning during the time period in question. The bones exhumed from the graves of those Romans who were less than fortunate in life did not show signs of lead poisoning.
Whether or not the lead poison theory is provable is irrelevant. The result of the Roman Empire’s decline and fall is indisputable. Parasites do not become producers any more than did those ancient Romans who inherited political power by accident.
Rapid decline
Perhaps accelerated decline is more apt to America than rapid decline in the case of the Roman Empire. America has been declining since the day Socialism took root in this country in the late 19th century. The decline proceeded at a slow pace after 1913 due, in large part, to Socialist-strategists being satisfied with small steps.
The major difference between Socialism and Communism is that 19th century Socialists set out to acquire political power incrementally, while Communists always preferred violent revolution. I believe that Socialists preferred incrementalism because it gave them time to teach parasites how to govern.
Parenthetically, in 1994, the Clintons tried and failed to take a big step with HillaryCare. When Hillary ran for office she whitewashed the evils inherent in socialized medicine by scurrying back to the safety of incrementalism as though evil in small doses is good:
Events in the past five years tell me that today’s Socialist-strategists believe that parasites are prepared to govern. Or perhaps signs of a violent counterrevolution makes incrementalism’s time table too risky. Pelosi, Reid, Taqiyya, and the rest of them took so many big steps toward totalitarian in five years America’s decline accelerated to warp speed. That brings me back to Alinsky via Joe Wilson:
Read Kline’s article for a list of the most egregious lies:
Finally, parasites feasting at the public larder had more to do with bringing down every civilization, every empire, every country, every culture, than did any other factor. America will be no different.
Substitute the words producers and parasites for the words “Haves” and “Have-Nots” and you’ll see that Alinsky conned everyone into believing that parasites would magically morph into producers after they seized power with Alinsky lies, doublespeak, misdirection, intimidation, violence and threats of violence.
Far from being the political genius Hillary Clinton swoons over, Alinsky did nothing more than write an instruction book for implementing Socialism/Communism. Following Alinsky’s instructions to a tee, the final stage of 19th century Socialism/Communism is being codified by Barack Taqiyya & Company.
Forget Alinsky for a minute. Socialism/Communism itself is so easily discredited I’m astonished at how far Socialists have come. Bear with me as I reach back in time to make my case.
Admittedly, attributing the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire to lead poisoning is only a theory:
Interpreting the decline and fall of the Roman Empire most often depended upon who was doing the interpreting. Priesthoods blamed it on a loss of morality. Military minds said that hiring mercenaries was responsible for the fall. Philosophical interpretations of anything always send up warning flares.
NOTE: American Socialists want our military to fight and die in foreign lands for philosophical reasons.
I place no faith in philosophical autopsies performed on long dead empires, but I am partial to lead poison explaining the decline and fall of the Roman Empire because it is a legitimate scientific inquiry searching for proof.
Except for the Roman Empire, empires in the ancient world usually disappeared because they were conquered. To me, the critical factor is that the Roman Empire was not conquered, but it did decline very rapidly because of lead poisoning.
The impoverished could not afford expensive lead-laden wines and food. Those Romans who governed the empire died off too quickly for the materially disadvantaged to govern a complex society, let alone hold onto a far-reaching empire. Put that in perspective by evaluating today’s Democrats and their contribution to America’s shrinking worldwide political empire. Democrats are the ones who wailed that America was losing respect in the world under Bush, yet philosophical “respect” pales in comparison to the real losses America’s foreign policy is causing under Socialism.
Also, I recall reading that the lead poisoning theory was strengthened by examining the skeletal remains of those Romans who died before, during, and after the Empire’s period of rapid decline. The graves of those Romans who were solvent on the day they checked out yielded an extraordinary number of skeletons whose original owners had died from lead poisoning during the time period in question. The bones exhumed from the graves of those Romans who were less than fortunate in life did not show signs of lead poisoning.
Whether or not the lead poison theory is provable is irrelevant. The result of the Roman Empire’s decline and fall is indisputable. Parasites do not become producers any more than did those ancient Romans who inherited political power by accident.
Rapid decline
Perhaps accelerated decline is more apt to America than rapid decline in the case of the Roman Empire. America has been declining since the day Socialism took root in this country in the late 19th century. The decline proceeded at a slow pace after 1913 due, in large part, to Socialist-strategists being satisfied with small steps.
The major difference between Socialism and Communism is that 19th century Socialists set out to acquire political power incrementally, while Communists always preferred violent revolution. I believe that Socialists preferred incrementalism because it gave them time to teach parasites how to govern.
Parenthetically, in 1994, the Clintons tried and failed to take a big step with HillaryCare. When Hillary ran for office she whitewashed the evils inherent in socialized medicine by scurrying back to the safety of incrementalism as though evil in small doses is good:
Events in the past five years tell me that today’s Socialist-strategists believe that parasites are prepared to govern. Or perhaps signs of a violent counterrevolution makes incrementalism’s time table too risky. Pelosi, Reid, Taqiyya, and the rest of them took so many big steps toward totalitarian in five years America’s decline accelerated to warp speed. That brings me back to Alinsky via Joe Wilson:
Read Kline’s article for a list of the most egregious lies:
Finally, parasites feasting at the public larder had more to do with bringing down every civilization, every empire, every country, every culture, than did any other factor. America will be no different.
Last edited:
