, because Mr Nasralny isn't dangerous, his voters ( almost all are below twenties ) are tiny minority, between 0,5 and 1 % of all voters
In 2013 Moscow mayoral election Navalniy got 27% of the vote.
en.m.wikipedia.org
the
Economist :
It doesn't matter who will be the Russian tsar. How cant you get this?
I know it always wrote, but did you see the
Economist ´s analysis of the situation ? I guess you did not, it will not be a new czar
, Putin is the last one. With cost of “black gold” at 15-
23 dollars per barrel, the USSR economy collapsed, and the sovok itself collapsed, and the "golden" horde ("russia") budget can only be fulfilled only with oil price at $
42.4 and higher
The video from the Economist isn't analysis, it just describes some events.
I am curious. So, Russia collapses. Without it, there will be several states with outdated industry which will be poor, because they cant rely on oil revenue once again. What is next?
" be poor, because they cant rely on oil revenue once again" you are
wrong from the start
you´d begin with this
The natural resources are 'bad' for developed countries. It is a different story for the poor ones.
So, why cant Russia get an impulse in its development without the oil, as a single one? Let me guess. Because of the bad tsar?
"The natural resources are 'bad' for developed countries. It is a
different story for the poor ones." tell it to Congo , Venezuela, USSR , Nigeria, rf, etc.
Russia and the “Resource Curse”: When the Kremlin's Policy ...
carnegie.ru › 2017/04/24 › russia-and-resource-curse-whe...
Apr 24, 2017 - How can
Russia overcome
the “resource curse”? What countries should be an example for Moscow? What consequences can the
Russian ...
I will make it shore, the different countries will have different from of governments - economies- GDP per capita. as I see it today, Tatarstan , Sakha will be do ok,
Ingrians and Tyumen will do even better ,
"
Tyumen Oblast with its two autonomous okrugs has the most abundant resources in Russia. It provides 2/3 of all Russian oil and over 90% of natural gas (Gazprom is nothing without it). Deprived of its minerals, the rest of Russia would automatically turn into a huge importer of natural gas and would hardly be able to export oil or oil products, but would most likely have to import those as well. The population of Tyumen Oblast was a mere 3.55 million at the beginning of 2014, with just 2.15 million in the autonomous okrugs that extract oil and gas. This makes the region comparable to Kuwait in terms of oil extraction per capita (Kuwait’s population is 2.7 million people). The only difference is that Tyumen Oblast extracts 3.5 times more oil and over 150 more gas than Kuwait does.
Moscow is currently taking all rent from these riches, channeling it into confrontation with the outer world and support of depressed regions inside Russia, including a toll to North Caucasus republics. Thus, even though ethnic Russians make up an absolute majority in Tyumen Oblast, they have sufficient socio-economic motivation to get independence. Remote as it is
from China, it faces minimum Chinese threat. The scale of its integration with European economy opens vast possibilities for entering the protectorate of the EU and NATO. That option would be much cheaper for the region compared to the funding of all Russia and its growing spending on the military industry and external expansion.
"
but again, its up to the Locals what states they will build , one for sure without Moscow they have chances
Separatism in Russia
View attachment 390874
View attachment 390875
