Democrats cheated in states that were battleground states. They planned it out for many months. Trump heard it would happen and predicted it. Trump was correct.
I do not recall the particulars but Eric defied Congress and he and Navarro qualified as members of the president's cabinet.
| Personal details | |
|---|---|
| Director of the National Trade Council | |
| Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy | |
| Peter Navarro | |
 Navarro in 2018 | |
| Imprisoned | |
| In office April 29, 2017 – January 20, 2021 | |
| President | Donald Trump |
| Preceded by | Position established |
| Succeeded by | Position abolished |
| In office January 20, 2017 – April 29, 2017 | |
| President | Donald Trump |
| Preceded by | Position established |
| Succeeded by | Position abolished |
| Born | Peter Kent Navarro July 15, 1949 (age 74) Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. |
| Political party | Republican (1989–1991, 2018–present) |
| Other political affiliations | Democratic (before 1986, 1994–2018) Independent (1986–1989, 1991–1994) |
| Spouse | Leslie Lebon (m. 2001; div. 2020) |
| Education | Tufts University (BA) Harvard University (MPA, PhD) |
I don’t see any of Navarro’s positions as being in the cabinet or at cabinet level.I do not recall the particulars but Eric defied Congress and he and Navarro qualified as members of the president's cabinet.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Peter Navarre or Pedro Navarro.
Peter Kent Navarro (born July 15, 1949) is an American economist who served in the Trump administration, first as Deputy Assistant to the President and director of the short-lived White House National Trade Council, then as Assistant to the President, Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy in the new Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy; he was also named the national Defense Production Act policy coordinator.[1][2] He is a professor emeritus of economics and public policy at the Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, and the author of Death by China, among other publications.
Peter Navarro Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Director of the National Trade Council Personal details
Navarro in 2018Imprisoned In office
April 29, 2017 – January 20, 2021President Donald Trump Preceded by Position established Succeeded by Position abolished In office
January 20, 2017 – April 29, 2017President Donald Trump Preceded by Position established Succeeded by Position abolished Born Peter Kent Navarro
July 15, 1949 (age 74)
Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.Political party Republican (1989–1991, 2018–present) Other political
affiliationsDemocratic (before 1986, 1994–2018)
Independent (1986–1989, 1991–1994)Spouse Leslie Lebon
(m. 2001; div. 2020)Education Tufts University (BA)
Harvard University (MPA, PhD)
I posted proof that Navarro served Trump.I don’t see any of Navarro’s positions as being in the cabinet or at cabinet level.
Cabinet of Donald Trump - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
More to the point, Navarro was not protected by executive privilege. Holder was.
That’s the main difference.
Compare the crowds that showed up for Biden vs those for Trump.
Do you know what executive privilege is? You seem to keep ignoring this very vital issue.
The press constantly calls Navarro a Trump aide. Justice has fled the USA thanks to Biden.
He was a Trump aid, but not in his cabinet.
More will be going to jail too. They're dumbasses. He doesn't give 2 shits about them.
You mean because there was a republican majority that let him off the hook.
There was a Democrat majority in the House and all they did was try to convict Trump. And failed enormously.
I doubt you are the forum expert on this topic.
All I know is that Holder had a claim of executive privilege and Navarro didn’t.
That is not what Roberts said.
This is a technical decision about appealing the decision.
Roberts was clear his decision was not related to the Navarro claim of executive privilege.
Navarro made the argument in court and the court found he did not have a legitimate claim.
Executive privilege generally allows the president and his close advisers to refuse to produce documents or testimony to the judicial or legislative branches under some circumstances. The exact parameters of the privilege are still very much in doubt because the overwhelming majority of executive privilege claims have been resolved by negotiation rather than court order. This is not surprising, given that most privilege claims are intensely political, and courts have created a doctrine to avoid ruling on intensely political questions.
