Pete Hegseth Will Learn That White Supremacist Armies Always Lose

Prove Jesus existed...

Are you getting the picture now?
While no direct archaeological evidence exists, the historical existence of Jesus is widely accepted by secular and Christian scholars due to multiple, independent, early sources
. Evidence includes letters from Paul (AD 48-64) and mentions by Roman/Jewish historians like Tacitus and Josephus, who confirm Jesus was executed by Pontius Pilate.

Key Historical Evidence for the Existence of Jesus
  • Roman and Jewish Sources: Tacitus (Roman senator) wrote in the Annals (c. AD 116) about Jesus's execution. Josephus, a 1st-century Jewish historian, mentioned Jesus in his work Antiquities of the Jews.
  • Early Christian Writings:Paul the Apostle's letters are contemporary accounts, written within 20–30 years of the crucifixion
    .
    • Independent Sources: Around 14 independent sources (including Christian, Roman, and Jewish) exist within a century of Jesus's life.
    • The "Embarrassment Factor": Historical researchers find that accounts containing unflattering details—such as Jesus being crucified (a humiliating punishment)—support the idea that it was a real person, not an invented story.
 
The Muslims will never peacefully coexist.
They have been trying to erase Israel for over 70 years.

1775409218907.webp
 
The Confederacy and Nazi Germany started two of the great wars of the last 200 years, and each time the philosophy of exclusion and superiority lost.

“Since the American Civil War, a striking pattern has emerged: every army that marched under the banner of white supremacy has been defeated. The Confederate States of America, forged to preserve slavery, was crushed in 1865. Nazi Germany, built on racial conquest and genocide, collapsed in 1945. Apartheid South Africa, sustained by racist ideology and military power, yielded to liberation movements by the early 1990s.

These defeats are not coincidences of history, but moral reckonings written in blood and consequence. Each of these regimes believed that racial hierarchy was a foundation of order and strength. In practice, it bred arrogance, cruelty, and isolation—the poisons of decay. The armies of such states may rally fanatics, but they cannot sustain legitimacy, cohesion, or the will of the world.

Modern history’s ledger is clear: white supremacist nations lose their wars not only because their enemies are stronger, but because their cause is weaker. No military doctrine or industrial output can redeem an ideology built on human degradation. In the end, the myth of racial supremacy has proven to be not a source of power, but a guarantee of downfall.”


Or ballrooms or golf courses.
Boy, are you and the dailykos in for a rude awakening.
 
Wait what?
Can't you read English?
I thought Iran already publicly committed to no nukes.
It has.
. accomplished through diplomacy. Isn't that the primary Democrat claim? That diplomacy alone works to keep Iran from having nukes? Now we know diplomacy isn't working. That's a major reason for the war.
What if it was willing to reaffirm, destroy its enriched uranium, allow inspectors in to verify and all of the other reasonable things we expect BUT only if Israel did the same?

Would you approve? of course you wouldn't, your flummoxed.
 
While no direct archaeological evidence exists, the historical existence of Jesus is widely accepted by secular and Christian scholars due to multiple, independent, early sources
. Evidence includes letters from Paul (AD 48-64) and mentions by Roman/Jewish historians like Tacitus and Josephus, who confirm Jesus was executed by Pontius Pilate.

Key Historical Evidence for the Existence of Jesus
  • Roman and Jewish Sources: Tacitus (Roman senator) wrote in the Annals (c. AD 116) about Jesus's execution. Josephus, a 1st-century Jewish historian, mentioned Jesus in his work Antiquities of the Jews.
  • Early Christian Writings:Paul the Apostle's letters are contemporary accounts, written within 20–30 years of the crucifixion
    .
    • Independent Sources: Around 14 independent sources (including Christian, Roman, and Jewish) exist within a century of Jesus's life.
    • The "Embarrassment Factor": Historical researchers find that accounts containing unflattering details—such as Jesus being crucified (a humiliating punishment)—support the idea that it was a real person, not an invented story.
So no proof (like in mathamtics) only material facts that are consistent with Jesus having actually lived, indirect evidence that one can interpret as sufficient reason to choose to believe he did exist.

Is that what you mean by proof then?
 
Can't you read English?

It has.

What if it was willing to reaffirm, destroy its enriched uranium, allow inspectors in to verify and all of the other reasonable things we expect BUT only if Israel did the same?

Would you approve? of course you wouldn't, your flummoxed.
Do you think Iran has proven to be truthful?
 
So no proof (like in mathamtics) only material facts that are consistent with Jesus having actually lived, indirect evidence that one can interpret as sufficient reason to choose to believe he did exist.

Is that what you mean by proof then?
What’s your proof he didn’t?
 
What if it was willing to reaffirm, destroy its enriched uranium, allow inspectors in to verify and all of the other reasonable things we expect BUT only if Israel did the same?
So Israel can't have nukes.. for the same reason Iran can't have them? Is Israel an international threat to peace and security the way Iran is? Just apply "gun control" logic to the situation. Criminals can't have guns. Outlaw nations can't have nukes.
 
What’s your proof he didn’t?
I never made such a propostion so I certainly wouldn't claim to be able to prove it.

We were discussing Israel's nuclear weapons, you asked me for "proof" so I asked you to clarify what you actually meant by "proof" and you did that.

Even a cursory review of the copious documentation will show that the evidence for Israel having nuclear weapons is far less controversail than the evidence that Jesus lived and was resurrected after being dead three days, so yes Israel does have hundreds of nuclear weapons, do som basic research, read intelligence reports etc.
 
Won’t answer that one eh? Level playing field my ass.
Its meaningless because asking "Do you think COUNTRY-X has proven to be truthful?" is meaningless. Every country has done things that their leaders have denied.

You think Israel has a RIGHT to have nuclear wapons and Iran does not, that's your view, prejudice and cowardice, deferrrece to the Zionist regime because you've convinced yourself that your salvation depends on idolozing the Zionist monstrosity.
 
For the record, Israel isn't hiding the fact that they have a nuclear arsenal so arguing otherwise is kind of dumb.
 
For the record, Israel isn't hiding the fact that they have a nuclear arsenal so arguing otherwise is kind of dumb.
There is trucklods of data too, the US caught Israeli spies even, stealing US nuclear secrets, only a fool would ask for proof or an antipatriot like so many of the Israel supporters here.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Its meaningless because asking "Do you think COUNTRY-X has proven to be truthful?" is meaningless. Every country has done things that their leaders have denied.

You think Israel has a RIGHT to have nuclear wapons and Iran does not, that's your view, prejudice and cowardice, deferrrece to the Zionist regime because you've convinced yourself that your salvation depends on idolozing the Zionist monstrosity.
Oh Jesus H Christ on a cracker....All of this to find out you're just a run of the mill Jew hater....I'm done with this....Go join the others and moan about the existence of Israel....
 
Oh Jesus H Christ on a cracker....All of this to find out you're just a run of the mill Jew hater....I'm done with this....Go join the others and moan about the existence of Israel....
I'm suggesting a level playing field for nuclear weaopons, you are the one resisting the idea, you are a Persian Hater obviously.

How is suggesting Israel and Iran should both be compelled to abandon nuclear weapons, hating Jews?
 
I'm suggesting a level playing field for nuclear weaopons, you are the one resisting the idea, you are a Persian Hater obviously.

How is suggesting Israel and Iran should both be compelled to abandon nuclear weapons, hating Jews?
Iran has vowed to wipe out Israel, and America...So, yes, I don't want them having the technology to do so....Wow, I'm a terrible person....GTFOH.
 
Back
Top Bottom