What planet are you on? Fake charges, when we have already seen the prosecution of the mishandling of classified material by lower ranking officials?
And as Clinton didn't mishandle information like that, you've just shown us another of the double standards that you depend on. And thanks for confirmin your Stalinist nature again, shown by the way you want to prosecute on faked charges.
If your going to make the accusation they were fake charges, you have to FIRST have the ability to back that claim up. I don't believe the Inspector General quickly dismissed those charges as fake. Look at the government standards for handling classified documents below.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust,
or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
(2)
having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone
in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Do you have a proven record of what those deleted emails contained, or can find a justification for Hillary Clinton taken added precaution to thoroughly wipe her private server clean of those suspected deleted emails? Why go through the additional concern and safeguards if they were simply personal email conversations that were removed? You are going to have to provide a lot more than "Fake charges" if you want your BS argument to be at all convincing.
[QUOTE="ShaklesOfBigGov, post: 15526531while the left couldn't keep their big mouth shut through Republicans efforts to impeach Bill Clinton over Monica Lewinsky.
Remind us, when did CLinton brag about having affairs?[/QUOTE]
Bragging? Are you serious, this is your argument? We have an ex president you actually ACTED upon those statements when he was governor, has a trail of accusers going further into his political career to include his actions as president, has a wife that defended such actions by demonizijg the character of his accusers that came forward, and you're concerned over whether or not he bragged about it. Bill Clinton was a predictor of power with a known history of lewd acts against female subordinates, and later that very behavior would be defended by Hillary Clinton. Perhaps you are too young to comprehend what the Clinton's were involved in.
Going after Trump, when Hillary soent a good part of her political life protecting a sexual predator and actually demonizing those victims who came forward, is exactly what liberal hypocrites have done here. Hillary should have allowed the judicial system to play out and do its job if she TRULY believed her husband should be acquitted of the accusations. By simply allowing herself to do that, she could honestly say she stands for and represents the rights of women who face powerful lewd men like Donald Trump. Instead, the only interest she has consistently shown an interest in, is preserving her own self image. She wants to be president, and she will use and defend, or turn and attack, predators that have a personal political benefit to her own powerful interests. Her actions prove she does not give a damn of what male predictors can do to women or the harm they cause. She will keep smiling and waving until she gets what she wants - "who honestly gives a crap" is her attitude.
