i have no idea what they where gonna charge or if they were.Do you have a link? I can't seem to find it. What were the charges going to be against the families?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
i have no idea what they where gonna charge or if they were.Do you have a link? I can't seem to find it. What were the charges going to be against the families?
Yes, there is no audio on the videos.BULLSHIT. I've SEEN the videos, both as shown at the J6 show trial and as they really are. CCTV videos don't have microphones, idiot. Now we know why the democrats hired a Hollywood producer to orchestrate the whole committee of hand-selected people all with an already decided outcome on the results of the findings months before they even started the investigation!
So, why did they dub the police calls of the breach over the images of the riot? Dramatic license?Yes, there is no audio on the videos.
and you can clearly see that the audio of the cops calling in the breach, has no audio on the Windows and doors being smashed and broken. You only hear the cops calling in the breach of the Capitol to headquarters, while viewing the silent video of the rioters breaching.
Yes, you are all correct the video itself, has no sound at the moment of this breach. To me, it could not be more obvious....there is no pounding on the door sounds or glass breaking sounds to go with the breach taking place in the video.
the sound we do hear is the sound of the radio calls of cops calling in to head quarters that the Capitol has been breached by the people we see in the video.
I do not see an issue with this. To me it is a view of what was happening in the video, from the cop's perspective who were viewing the breach live, and how the cops were responding.....at that same precise moment....
the audio of the breach from a cop's angle is real
the video of the rioters breaching the Capitol is real
it didn't make the silent video worse, or anyone think the audio came from the video tape. You can clearly see and hear the audio did not have any glass and door smashing sounds, which in my opinion....would have been worse sounding than hearing what the cops were doing at that time.
The timestamps of the radio call, and the video of the breach, took place at the exact same time period. It showed what was happening at that time from different angles....the breaching and the cops call on the breach to head quarters.... It encapsulated the moment.... Gave us all a clearer view of what was happening at the moment in time recorded on the video, imho.So, why did they dub the police calls of the breach over the images of the riot? Dramatic license?
It was fabricated, Simp.The timestamps of the radio call, and the video of the breach, took place at the exact same time period. It showed what was happening at that time from different angles....the breaching and the cops call on the breach to head quarters.... It encapsulated the moment.... Gave us all a clearer view of what was happening at the moment in time recorded on the video, imho.
I see no harm done in that... it simply makes us better understand what was going on all at once....
obviously you don't even know the definition of fabricated.It was fabricated, Simp.
I think this thread exposes how desperate the republicans are to try and look less bad and less pathetic on Jan 6th.The timestamps of the radio call, and the video of the breach, took place at the exact same time period. It showed what was happening at that time from different angles....the breaching and the cops call on the breach to head quarters.... It encapsulated the moment.... Gave us all a clearer view of what was happening at the moment in time recorded on the video, imho.
I see no harm done in that... it simply makes us better understand what was going on all at once....
Didn't you say this?:i have no idea what they where gonna charge or if they were.
I'm looking for the link that says they did this.when the govt says they won’t go after their families if they plea it protects their families
Your whinefest has nothing to do with the thread topic, Troll.obviously you don't even know the definition of fabricated.
You people need to lie and make shit up because you look so fuckin bad on Jan 6th
Jan 6th is a day that will live forever in infamy, when all the MAGA trash rioted at the Capitol and repeatedly beat cops. You people are so desperate to try and change that narrative, but it happened AND its all on video and we can all watch the 10000+ video proving it happened.
I love watching you people squirm and flail of the the Jan 6th Trump Insurrection, because it exposes the Republicans for the trash that they are.
Maybe i watch all the videos of the MAGA trash rioting and beating cops again.
Do you know if the evidence was altered or not? It seems that is the OP. I didn't see any question regarding court cases. Odd. I see yet again, you have trouble in here following rules.Boy, somebody better tell all those insurrectionists who pleaded guilty!
here's how they do it... agree with our terms or we go after......I'm looking for the link that says they did this.
Your total lies have no factual basis at all.Your whinefest has nothing to do with the thread topic, Troll.
what lie?Your total lies have no factual basis at all.
here's how they do it... agree with our terms or we go after......
Something seems rotten in Flynn’s case — and maybe others, too
What we didn’t know until now about the former national security adviser’s plea agreement hurt justice, possibly for all.thehill.com
To back up her claims, Powell’s submission included exhibits. They are still under court-ordered restrictions and thus heavily redacted. But the glimpses we get are intriguing. Exhibit 1 includes an unredacted snippet of an email between two of Flynn’s C&B lawyers; in it, Robert Kelner states to Stephen Anthony: “We have a lawyers’ unofficial understanding that they [i.e., the prosecutors] are unlikely to charge Junior [Flynn’s son] in light of the Cooperation Agreement” — Flynn’s commitment to provide information and testimony in other prosecutions.
The ask was someone submitting based on threats to other family members. I quoted the threat, has nothing to do with who wrote the document, it is the quoted material that is relevant asshole.An opinion piece.
Allegations by Sidney "release the kraken" Powell.
From your article:
"Obviously, we should reserve final judgment; there are still facts we don’t know. The timing is hard to follow: Flynn pleaded guilty and signed his cooperation agreement on Dec. 1, 2017; yet, the correspondence between the C&B lawyers is dated March 2018. That is, the lawyers appear to be revisiting terms of a plea agreement their client had entered four months earlier, not scrutinizing an agreement he was about to enter."
Have these allegations ever been proven?
Yes, there is no audio on the videos.
And all of us who watched LIVE on Jan 6!Boy, somebody better tell all those insurrectionists who pleaded guilty!
Did you go and help with the FAILED insurrection on Jan 6th? Or did you just cheer from home?