Pelosi won't rule out launching new impeachment inquiry to block Trump SCOTUS nominee

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,479
Reaction score
13,350
Points
2,290
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
The Republicans are the ultimate power hungry animals because they can't win elections without cheating. They've held the House for all but 6 years of the last 20, while losing the popular vote in every Congressional election, through voter suppression and gerrymandering. The Republican Party is a ruling minority party who has done what the Founders never intended - found a way to legal maintain power by thwarting the electoral process and the will of the people.

Ronald Reagan created the Republican coalition of evangelical Christians, dissaffected Southern racists, and political conservatives because it was the only way for Republicans to win elections. Who is going to vote for a party which crashes the economy every 10 years, to enrich their wealthy base? Because that's what Republicans are doing.

Donald Trump commits impeachable offences daily. Obstruction of justice is an ongoing item here. Plus there's the emoluments he continues to collect - paying for hotels rooms on Trump properties which are closed.
You are such a SAP Dragon. Let me fill you in on why you've been so brainwashed:

For decades, the commies have been telling us that the Republicans are a thing of the past; rich old white men dying off; that Americans are going progressive, which is short for Socialism and Communism.

So when Republicans fairly win elections, they can't tell their sheep the truth, that yes, there are a lot of Americans who respect the Constitution, who believe in tradition, who have a love for God, who support capitalism. Now if they were to be honest with their sheep, it would knock the wind out of their sails. They may give up on voting feeling defeated.

So how do we keep these suckers coming to the polls? I know! We will tell them they really won, it's just that the Republicans once again found a way to cheat them out of their win.

George W Bush first election: The supreme court, hanging chads, brother of the Governor.
GW's reelection: Diebold machines.
Republicans taking over the House in 2010: Gerrymandering, voter suppression.
Republicans taking over the Senate: Voter-ID, voter suppression, long lines at the polls.
Trump election: Russian collusion, FBI reporting newly found emails.

The problem is not Republicans cheating, the problem is you people can't think for yourself. Even a fourth grader can see an obvious pattern here.

So now the fun is going to be what kind of nonsense are they going to feed you to continue this Republican cheating lie. They are running out of excuses you know. And I'll bet my dollar to your dime, they will once again make claim Republicans somehow cheated. Why would I make this bet? Because I can see the obvious pattern. I know of the man behind the curtain.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
16,921
Reaction score
12,312
Points
2,415
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
The Republicans are the ultimate power hungry animals because they can't win elections without cheating. They've held the House for all but 6 years of the last 20, while losing the popular vote in every Congressional election, through voter suppression and gerrymandering. The Republican Party is a ruling minority party who has done what the Founders never intended - found a way to legal maintain power by thwarting the electoral process and the will of the people.

Ronald Reagan created the Republican coalition of evangelical Christians, dissaffected Southern racists, and political conservatives because it was the only way for Republicans to win elections. Who is going to vote for a party which crashes the economy every 10 years, to enrich their wealthy base? Because that's what Republicans are doing.

Donald Trump commits impeachable offences daily. Obstruction of justice is an ongoing item here. Plus there's the emoluments he continues to collect - paying for hotels rooms on Trump properties which are closed.
Donald Trump commits impeachable offences daily.

I would ask you to list these offences, but we all know you are an unhinged, single digit IQ fuckwit who has nothing better to do than show up on this board and puke lie after lie.

You are a fucking joke.

But by all means, feel free to prove me wrong and list his "daily impeachable offences".

GO!
Dragonlady

Let's see these "daily impeachable offences" you claim Trump commits.

Where are they?

GO!
 
OP
OKTexas

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
49,942
Reaction score
9,228
Points
2,070
Location
Near Magnolia, TX
I'm guessing it's a horribly timed bluff. There is no way they would win on impeachment, they may not even get the votes in the House which they control. It would hurt Biden immensely and encourage more demands for his nomination list.

The differences in the situation are severe, Trump and the senate are simply going forward with their constitutional duty, especially when Hillary is telling Biden "not to concede under any circumstances" and they sent out, without any debate; how many millions of unsolicited voting ballots?

Trump didn't ask RBG to remain a judge until 87. Clearly she hasn't been in any position to make key S.C decisions for some time if she was fighting this deadly disease, so why didn't she retire?

Let's see if Trump and the GOP call out their bluff. I think at this point, if GOP do NOT go forward with a pick, they are going to get trounced. The gloves have been off for too long and GOP supporters want to counter the one-sided pile-on. It is, what seems to be politics today.

maobama asked her to retire so he could replace her, she refused.

.
 
OP
OKTexas

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
49,942
Reaction score
9,228
Points
2,070
Location
Near Magnolia, TX
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty
It's the autumnal equinox and Halloween is coming up. Nancy Pelosi, the instigator of the failed sham impeachment proceedings, is not only threatening but actively planning, facilitating, and coordinating a violent coup d'état to assassinate Donald Trump and totally take over the government with a DEMOCRAT-ONLY junta.

That kind of thinking wouldn't end well for them.

.
 

Claudette

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
37,946
Reaction score
8,134
Points
1,330
How are the two connected? A new investigation would be held in The House. The Confirmation of the next SCJ will be in The Senate.
Yup and I hope it Barrette. She's Constitutionalist Judge and we need more of those folks on the SC. Pelousy can moan, groan and complain but her House can't do a damned thing. LOL
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
20,450
Reaction score
1,180
Points
190
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
16,921
Reaction score
12,312
Points
2,415
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
 

Canon Shooter

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
3,131
Reaction score
3,078
Points
1,918
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
I think that launching fake impeachments should be punished.
Removal from office would be a good start....jail terms would be great.
Absolutely agree...
 

Camp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
27,532
Reaction score
6,803
Points
280
Pelosi doesn't need Ukrain nonsense. Trump should be impeached for COVID-19 malfeasance. It will be a record television rating event.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
20,450
Reaction score
1,180
Points
190
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
16,921
Reaction score
12,312
Points
2,415
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,479
Reaction score
13,350
Points
2,290
Pelosi doesn't need Ukrain nonsense. Trump should be impeached for COVID-19 malfeasance. It will be a record television rating event.
Great, a bunch of people like you who don't understand what impeachment is for.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
20,450
Reaction score
1,180
Points
190
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
Trump would have had him arrested... if what he did was illegal, and wouldn't have had to ask Ukraine for help. Seems pretty obvious to me.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,479
Reaction score
13,350
Points
2,290
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
Trump would have had him arrested... if what he did was illegal, and wouldn't have had to ask Ukraine for help. Seems pretty obvious to me.
How do you arrest somebody with no evidence of wrongdoing and no investigation? Trump asked Zelensky if he could find out what really happened there. He was looking to see if there was any illegal activity taking place and where to look to find it.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
20,450
Reaction score
1,180
Points
190
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
Trump would have had him arrested... if what he did was illegal, and wouldn't have had to ask Ukraine for help. Seems pretty obvious to me.
How do you arrest somebody with no evidence of wrongdoing and no investigation? Trump asked Zelensky if he could find out what really happened there. He was looking to see if there was any illegal activity taking place and where to look to find it.
C'mon brah, you seem pretty intelligent, so we all know what was going on. Spin won't work on this, it's too obvious what Trump was doing.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,479
Reaction score
13,350
Points
2,290
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
Trump would have had him arrested... if what he did was illegal, and wouldn't have had to ask Ukraine for help. Seems pretty obvious to me.
How do you arrest somebody with no evidence of wrongdoing and no investigation? Trump asked Zelensky if he could find out what really happened there. He was looking to see if there was any illegal activity taking place and where to look to find it.
C'mon brah, you seem pretty intelligent, so we all know what was going on. Spin won't work on this, it's too obvious what Trump was doing.
Yes, it is obvious. Trump wanted to know why Biden insisted Shokin be fired immediately, and used a quid pro quo to get it done. Now if his sons company was not involved, that would be a different story. But the company his son worked for was under investigation by Shokin.

Why out of the 1.5 million US attorneys in this country, would a foreign company pick a drugged up loser who was dishonorably discharged from the military, who had zero experience in the energy field for a job with them? It's obvious it wasn't because of his expertise.

They gave him a job because of Creepy Joe. Okay, so what did they want in return? Protection. Yes, that is something our President should have asked about.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
20,450
Reaction score
1,180
Points
190
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
Trump would have had him arrested... if what he did was illegal, and wouldn't have had to ask Ukraine for help. Seems pretty obvious to me.
How do you arrest somebody with no evidence of wrongdoing and no investigation? Trump asked Zelensky if he could find out what really happened there. He was looking to see if there was any illegal activity taking place and where to look to find it.
C'mon brah, you seem pretty intelligent, so we all know what was going on. Spin won't work on this, it's too obvious what Trump was doing.
Yes, it is obvious. Trump wanted to know why Biden insisted Shokin be fired immediately, and used a quid pro quo to get it done. Now if his sons company was not involved, that would be a different story. But the company his son worked for was under investigation by Shokin.

Why out of the 1.5 million US attorneys in this country, would a foreign company pick a drugged up loser who was dishonorably discharged from the military, who had zero experience in the energy field for a job with them? It's obvious it wasn't because of his expertise.

They gave him a job because of Creepy Joe. Okay, so what did they want in return? Protection. Yes, that is something our President should have asked about.
Well, maybe you're not as smart as I thought, because everyone else knows what was going on.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
16,921
Reaction score
12,312
Points
2,415
Unfreaking believable. Pelosi is threatening Trump with impeachment for doing his constitutional duty.

Pelosi, appearing in an interview with ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos, would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings in order to block the Senate from confirming a nominee from President Donald Trump.


Discuss.

.
Both sides do shit like that. Try to block the other side no matter what's at stake, just for the sake of blocking the other side. The GOP did it in the Senate for Trump's un-American activities with Ukraine.

Frivolous doesn't come close to defining what Pelosi is contemplating, so try to stay on topic.

.
She's just doing something that the GOP would also do in a heartbeat if the tables were turned. And you're totally delusional if you don't think that they would.
Oh please, the Republicans are not such power hungry animals like the Democrats are. They would never do anything unethical to stop a justice from being nominated. Fight against it yes, but not to illegally use impeachment.
Trump tried to get Ukraine to help him win re-election. That's much, much worse than what Pelosi is doing.
How did Trump do that when he didn't even know who he'd be running against? And what law is there that a President cannot ask another world leader to look into a matter of impropriety?
I'm not even going there, you know what he did was wrong.
What he did was appropriate.
We did after all have Hiden admit it on national TV.
Asking a foreign country to make up some dirt on his main rival or they get no $$$? Geez, maybe I'm not talking to a sane person.
But Hiden telling them they wont get their billion dollars if they keep investigating Burisma is just fine.
If Biden had done something illegal, Trump would have not needed Ukraine.
What kind of stupid rationel is that?
Hiden was the one who told the Ukraine...no money for you if you dont fire the investigator who is investigating the company my coke head son works for.
If Biden had done something wrong/illegal. Trump could have nailed him on that, instead of asking Ukraine to dummy something up.
Link to Trump telling Ukraine to "dummy something up".

Watch this dodge...............
I get it, you’re too stupid to have figured out what really happened.
The dodge I predicted.

Run along kid, your bullshit was exposed for all to see. :dance:
So basically, Trump fooled you. Or you're not being honest. You choose.
I called out your bullshit. You obviously can't produce what you claim.

Now you think saying Trump fooled me will change that? Get a grip, Moron. :cuckoo:
Naw, It'll be futile to argue about what Trump was trying to do with Ukraine because you already know what happened. Un-patriotic and illegal actions by your guy doesn't matter to you. Says a lot about your side.
Trump would have had him arrested... if what he did was illegal, and wouldn't have had to ask Ukraine for help. Seems pretty obvious to me.
How do you arrest somebody with no evidence of wrongdoing and no investigation? Trump asked Zelensky if he could find out what really happened there. He was looking to see if there was any illegal activity taking place and where to look to find it.
C'mon brah, you seem pretty intelligent, so we all know what was going on. Spin won't work on this, it's too obvious what Trump was doing.
Yes, it is obvious. Trump wanted to know why Biden insisted Shokin be fired immediately, and used a quid pro quo to get it done. Now if his sons company was not involved, that would be a different story. But the company his son worked for was under investigation by Shokin.

Why out of the 1.5 million US attorneys in this country, would a foreign company pick a drugged up loser who was dishonorably discharged from the military, who had zero experience in the energy field for a job with them? It's obvious it wasn't because of his expertise.

They gave him a job because of Creepy Joe. Okay, so what did they want in return? Protection. Yes, that is something our President should have asked about.
Biden extorts a country to stop investigating the corruption his son is involved in............Trump asks that country to look into it.............Dimwingers impeach Trump over asking them to look into corruption.

That's how corrupt Dimwingers are.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top