Pelosi, Waters, Nadler and Schiff still sitting on the USMCA Trade Deal

[The Original Tree]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

 

[wamose]

As usual, Democrats come up against the American worker and economy again. Democrats are doing everything they can to derail our economy so they can blame Trump. It's pretty obvious that the Democrats interest in ruling doesn't include anything that will benefit the people but a lot that will benefit their party. The Democrats philosophy of keeping Americans poor, pissed off and dependent on government means the American worker will pay a big price if Democrats get any majority or the Presidency. .

 

[Rambunctious]

They hate Trump way more than they love America...do not ever vote for them again or you will be voting for an anti American.....

 

[The Original Tree]

Still waiting on The Do Nothing Dems to do what they were paid to do, WORK for AMERICA

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

comprehensive renegotiation????

A few minor tweaks and a pretty new name. The name change was the biggest change in the whole damn thing

 

[TheGreatSatan]

They hate Trump way more than they love America...do not ever vote for them again or you will be voting for an anti American.....

People who want to take something and fundamentally transform it into something completely different, probably don't like the original thing much.

 

[The Original Tree]

So Now The President Reached an agreement with Japan on a Spectacular Trade agreement to implement the first phase of it, and Nancy Pelosi is not only going to sit on The USMCA, she is going to sit on The Japan Trade agreement too.

 

[The Original Tree]

You can read the full story at the below link.

Trump says US and Japan have reached an initial trade agreement

KEY POINTS

• President Donald Trump says the U.S. and Japan have taken initial steps in reaching a trade agreement.

• The first stage of the deal will open markets up to $7 billion in U.S. products, he says.

• Trump says the document the leaders signed outlined “the significant steps we’re taking toward a fair and reciprocal trade agreement.”

The United States and Japan outlined initial details of a trade deal Wednesday as they to iron out a broader agreement.

The first stage of the accord will open markets up to about $7 billion in U.S. agricultural products, President Donald Trump said at a signing ceremony with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the United Nations. Japan will also reduce tariffs on products such as beef and pork, and eliminate tariffs on goods such as almonds, blueberries and broccoli.

Trump added that the two nations made commitments for $40 billion worth of digital trade. It would bar customs duties on products such as videos, music and e-books, among other provisions.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So Now The President Reached an agreement with Japan on a Spectacular Trade agreement to implement the first phase of it, and Nancy Pelosi is not only going to sit on The USMCA, she is going to sit on The Japan Trade agreement too.

Trump is bypassing Congress and making the deal with Japan an agreement and not a treaty...thus no approval needed.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You can read the full story at the below link.

Trump says US and Japan have reached an initial trade agreement

KEY POINTS

• 
  
  
  • President Donald Trump says the U.S. and Japan have taken initial steps in reaching a trade agreement.

• 
  
  
  • The first stage of the deal will open markets up to $7 billion in U.S. products, he says.

• 
  
  
  • Trump says the document the leaders signed outlined “the significant steps we’re taking toward a fair and reciprocal trade agreement.”

The United States and Japan outlined initial details of a trade deal Wednesday as they to iron out a broader agreement.

The first stage of the accord will open markets up to about $7 billion in U.S. agricultural products, President Donald Trump said at a signing ceremony with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the United Nations. Japan will also reduce tariffs on products such as beef and pork, and eliminate tariffs on goods such as almonds, blueberries and broccoli.

Trump added that the two nations made commitments for $40 billion worth of digital trade. It would bar customs duties on products such as videos, music and e-books, among other provisions.

Great news for my industry. Not so much for manufacturing

 

[edward37]

As usual, Democrats come up against the American worker and economy again. Democrats are doing everything they can to derail our economy so they can blame Trump. It's pretty obvious that the Democrats interest in ruling doesn't include anything that will benefit the people but a lot that will benefit their party. The Democrats philosophy of keeping Americans poor, pissed off and dependent on government means the American worker will pay a big price if Democrats get any majority or the Presidency. .

Yeah Skip right over the 150% rise in our DOW over Obama's 8 years republican traitor, supporting the worst pos ever to enter our WH

 

[edward37]

And skip right over 70+ months of 6 digit employment gains All you republicans are liars just like the orange pos is in our WH

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

comprehensive renegotiation????

A few minor tweaks and a pretty new name. The name change was the biggest change in the whole damn thing

Well, then why are the Dems sitting on it? do they have a better proposal or something?

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

comprehensive renegotiation????

A few minor tweaks and a pretty new name. The name change was the biggest change in the whole damn thing

Well, then why are the Dems sitting on it? do they have a better proposal or something?

.

They do not want to give Trump a PR win this close to the election

 

[Brain357]

The house has passed a lot that the senate refuses to vote on. I would assume they aren’t passing repub stuff till some deal is made to pass dem stuff.

And the new deal hardly changed anything, so it hardly matters.

 

[edward37]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

comprehensive renegotiation????

A few minor tweaks and a pretty new name. The name change was the biggest change in the whole damn thing

Well, then why are the Dems sitting on it? do they have a better proposal or something?

.

How many bills passed by the house that morons in the senate refuse to vote on ?? 100??

 

[jillian]

As usual, Democrats come up against the American worker and economy again. Democrats are doing everything they can to derail our economy so they can blame Trump. It's pretty obvious that the Democrats interest in ruling doesn't include anything that will benefit the people but a lot that will benefit their party. The Democrats philosophy of keeping Americans poor, pissed off and dependent on government means the American worker will pay a lbig price if Democrats get any majority or the Presidency. .

Stupid criminal trumpscum

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

comprehensive renegotiation????

A few minor tweaks and a pretty new name. The name change was the biggest change in the whole damn thing

Well, then why are the Dems sitting on it? do they have a better proposal or something?

.

How many bills passed by the house that morons in the senate refuse to vote on ?? 100??

It is a stupid, childish job that both parties play.

Personally though I see less bills becoming law a good thing

 

[Third Party]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

Well, the Democrats were right. They said if they got the House back, they would investigate Trump and ruin the country.

 

[edward37]

And you wonder why people think that The Current Dem Lead Congress is the worst this country has ever had.

Still nothing done on immigration reform.

Still nothing done on the USMCA trade deal.

Trump asked for The Dems to help make it possible for people to purchase Health Insurance across State lines to increase competition and lower costs, and The Dems ignored him.

Exactly what are they sucking up oxygen for and getting paid for?

Andy Puzder: NAFTA desperately needs to be replaced. So why is Democratic leadership standing in the way?

The leaders of the United States, Mexico and Canada have already signed the most important trade deal in a generation. Mexico and Canada, not China, are currently our two largest trading partners. For the sake of America’s economy and workers, this deal needs to get done.

The only obstacle is political obstruction by congressional Democrats more intent on depriving President Trump of a win than bestowing one on the American people.

This is politics at its worst, and that’s saying something.

The United States stands to make immense economic gains from this comprehensive renegotiation of the deeply flawed 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The importance of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is widely recognized on both sides of the political aisle, yet more than nine months after the signing ceremony, it lingers in Congress, unratified, undebated and uncertain.

As a “non-self-executing treaty,” both Houses of Congress have to pass the USMCA before it can take effect. Like all treaties of this magnitude, the deal deserves careful debate. But, given its broad popularity, the process should be much further along by now.

The question isn’t whether the deal is worth making, but rather why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is preventing debate. Various Democratic lawmakers have suggested that they might wish to tweak certain aspects of the agreement, but so far they’ve largely avoided even learning about the details.

The reasons for ratifying the USMCA as quickly as possible are readily apparent. NAFTA was poorly negotiated, typical of an era of very bad trade dealings by American leaders that hurt the people they should protect the most.

Full story at the link provided

comprehensive renegotiation????

A few minor tweaks and a pretty new name. The name change was the biggest change in the whole damn thing

Well, then why are the Dems sitting on it? do they have a better proposal or something?

.

How many bills passed by the house that morons in the senate refuse to vote on ?? 100??

It is a stupid, childish job that both parties play.

Personally though I see less bills becoming law a good thing

Infrastructure ,gun safety cleaner water purer air etc etc