bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,371
- 2,180
You don't invite the guy known to shit in the punch bowl, to the party.
You're only admitting that it's a kangaroo court, not an impartial inquiry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't invite the guy known to shit in the punch bowl, to the party.
MCarthy would never nominate her, so that's a no-op.You mean if McCarthy nominated Liz Cheney, that Nancy Pelosi would have said no?
Tell me more.
You mean Pisslosi should be questioned under oath?Why? You don’t want to understand who the players were that made this happen?
"whataboutism" is how Dims announce that they are proud to be hypocrites.That’s not a serious question because it’s not real. It’s counterfactual, counterinsurgent whadaboutism.
Wrong. The members of the Democrat Reich are the fascists.That's why the Neo-GOP are Fascist ideologues.
Let's try this again..... PARTISANSHIP is practiced by all Politicians. Don't pretend she is as pure as you are, she isn't. Nancy is one of the worst ever.
Nancy Pelosi will ‘cut your head off and you won’t even know you’re bleeding,’ daughter Alexandra Pelosi says
if the Dems didn't cheat to beat Trump, there would have been no need for the "riot"...the blood is on the Dems' hands!
/thread
We aren't responsible for the delusions of progs.
Yep! Of Course!! Everyone could see that coming! (From the grand old party of irresponsibility)![]()
MCarthy would never nominate her, so that's a no-op.
Nancy Pelosi will ‘cut your head off and you won’t even know you’re bleeding,’ daughter Alexandra Pelosi says
The above comment is an asset, learned and earned by any mother birthing and rearing 5 children ...not a detriment!![]()
Before they said, if Iraq didn't attack us on 9-11, there would have been no need for the Iraq war.if the Dems didn't cheat to beat Trump, there would have been no need for the "riot"...the blood is on the Dems' hands!
He would never nominate a lying RINO. That proves nothing other than his common sense.That says a lot, that McCarthy wouldn't nominate people who want to investigate january 6th.
Speaking of lying rhino. What did Jim Jordan said about his role in the Ohio State scandal? That the dozen students didn't come to him?He would never nominate a lying RINO. That proves nothing other than his common sense.
Deflection. That narrative was debunked long ago.Speaking of lying rhino. What did Jim Jordan said about his role in the Ohio State scandal? That the dozen students didn't come to him?
What is the validation you have that Jordan and others were not planning to tell the truth? That’s your opinion. Given that the Capitol Police and Security of the Capitol stops with Pelosi. I could say the same thing you said about Jordan. In either case, they are both opinions. Not fact.As ardent supporters of the Trumpybears BIGLIE, aka Jan. 6th movement, they were not planning on participating in any truth of fact finding investigation anyway and everyone knows it. So no loss of credibility, in fact they gained points by dumping that POS Jordan.
Accountability is not a serious question? You people want Republicans to participate while you determine who gets to sit on the Commission? Then this is not a serious exercise. Purely partisan on the part of Democrats.That’s not a serious question because it’s not real. It’s counterfactual, counterinsurgent whadaboutism.
Yea… that shit in the punch bowl will be counter arguments that Democrats can’t handle. Pelosi looks weak and childish banning Jordan.You don't invite the guy known to shit in the punch bowl, to the party.
The purpose of the group is to investigate January 6th.Yea… that shit in the punch bowl will be counter arguments that Democrats can’t handle. Pelosi looks weak and childish banning Jordan.