Pelosi inadvertantly admits she was part of the Coup

[HaShev]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*

 

[Hellokitty]

LOL, Barr has the democrats spinning. If they try and politicize the Mueller report as planned they know they can expect the backhand of TRUMP.

 

[Rambunctious]

I would love to be a fly on her and Obama's wall tonight....
Maybe we should spy on them....

 

[HaShev]

10 people minimum should be worried, 2 of which are untouchables which is why they knew they could do what they wanted.
They didn't care about ruining the lives of the other puppets who are not immune. The boomerang they threw is coming back now that it missed their target. People are already squeeling on each other.

 

[HaShev]

I would love to be a fly on her and Obama's wall tonight....
Maybe we should spy on them....

Feinstein's China connected assistant beat you to it. *L*

 

[Care4all]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

 

[Rambunctious]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

If Barr thought there was legitimate reasons for the spying on the Trump campaign (something you libs said never happened by the way)...he would have used the word surveillance....he said spying...and I'm guessing that has Obama shaking in his boots tonight....why didn't the "spies" tell Trump?....

 

[HaShev]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

Even with The illegal (abused)Fisa warrant you are not allowed to spy on U.S. civilians that are not the target of the warrant (Flynn was a civilian). In this case there were people set up, so as to spy on a campaign apponent during a campaign, weaponizing the Fisa to cheat /manipulate an election.
THIS IS THE VERY THING THAT WORRIED THE PUBLIC about it's potential abuses, and that's exactly what they did.

 

[Care4all]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

If Barr thought there was legitimate reasons for the spying on the Trump campaign (something you libs said never happened by the way)...he would have used the word surveillance....he said spying...and I'm guessing that has Obama shaking in his boots tonight....why didn't the "spies" tell Trump?....

spying, if you are saying it means surveillance outside of the law, DID NOT HAPPEN.

Surveillance, authorized by a FISA court of law judge, occurred on Carter Page AFTER he had left the Trump campaign, and also occurred on Manafort BEFORE he ever went to work for the Trump campaign, NEITHER HAPPENED while they worked for the campaign.

 

[Ambivalent1]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

If Barr thought there was legitimate reasons for the spying on the Trump campaign (something you libs said never happened by the way)...he would have used the word surveillance....he said spying...and I'm guessing that has Obama shaking in his boots tonight....why didn't the "spies" tell Trump?....

spying, if you are saying it means surveillance outside of the law, DID NOT HAPPEN.

Surveillance, authorized by a FISA court of law judge, occurred on Carter Page AFTER he had left the Trump campaign, and also occurred on Manafort BEFORE he ever went to work for the Trump campaign, NEITHER HAPPENED while they worked for the campaign.

Prove it or fuck off Prog.

 

[Rambunctious]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

If Barr thought there was legitimate reasons for the spying on the Trump campaign (something you libs said never happened by the way)...he would have used the word surveillance....he said spying...and I'm guessing that has Obama shaking in his boots tonight....why didn't the "spies" tell Trump?....

spying, if you are saying it means surveillance outside of the law, DID NOT HAPPEN.

Surveillance, authorized by a FISA court of law judge, occurred on Carter Page AFTER he had left the Trump campaign, and also occurred on Manafort BEFORE he ever went to work for the Trump campaign, NEITHER HAPPENED while they worked for the campaign.

They never told Trump...if they had told him they were there...you may have better standing with your point...they were spying on the opposition campaign...this is worse than WaterGate....

 

[DGS49]

What Democrat, watching her speak in front of the cameras, doesn't cringe? She is an idiot. Her lack of self-awareness is astounding, but for the fact that she undoubted has lived the majority of her adult life in a Leftist Echo Chamber.

Watching these Democrats question our esteemed A.G. is like watching a group of teenagers try to outsmart their professor. If it is a battle of wits, they are lacking ammunition. It is pathetic.

 

[Care4all]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

Even with The illegal (abused)Fisa warrant you are not allowed to spy on U.S. civilians that are not the target of the warrant (Flynn was a civilian). In this case there were people set up, so as to spy on a campaign apponent during a campaign, weaponizing the Fisa to cheat /manipulate an election.
THIS IS THE VERY THING THAT WORRIED THE PUBLIC about it's potential abuses, and that's exactly what they did.

hello? the surveillance on the Russian Ambassador operative, HAS BEEN GOING ON since the day he showed up years ago... as it should have been.... the surveillance was not on Flynn?

Coming from Military intelligence, even Flynn had to know that there was surveillance on the Russian operative Ambassador....

 

[HenryBHough]

I would love to be a fly on her and Obama's wall tonight....
Maybe we should spy on them....

Get in line behind The FBI, The KGB, China's Wun Hung Lo (chief spy) and several Brits who will invent whatever you want - for a price.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

10 people minimum should be worried, 2 of which are untouchables which is why they knew they could do what they wanted.
They didn't care about ruining the lives of the other puppets who are not immune. The boomerang they threw is coming back now that it missed their target. People are already squeeling on each other.

Nobody except Trump is worried.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

If Barr thought there was legitimate reasons for the spying on the Trump campaign (something you libs said never happened by the way)...he would have used the word surveillance....he said spying...and I'm guessing that has Obama shaking in his boots tonight....why didn't the "spies" tell Trump?....

He said he was not suggesting any impropriety, dope.

You dopes can't even keep up with current events on the same day they occur. LOL

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

Even with The illegal (abused)Fisa warrant you are not allowed to spy on U.S. civilians that are not the target of the warrant (Flynn was a civilian). In this case there were people set up, so as to spy on a campaign apponent during a campaign, weaponizing the Fisa to cheat /manipulate an election.
THIS IS THE VERY THING THAT WORRIED THE PUBLIC about it's potential abuses, and that's exactly what they did.

Flynn was caught on a warrant for the Russian he was talking to, dope.

Read up. Then explain to us when and where in the 702 process Flynn was illegally targeted.

Ample Safeguards of Civil Liberties Warrant FISA Section 702’s Reauthorization By Congress

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

If Barr thought there was legitimate reasons for the spying on the Trump campaign (something you libs said never happened by the way)...he would have used the word surveillance....he said spying...and I'm guessing that has Obama shaking in his boots tonight....why didn't the "spies" tell Trump?....

spying, if you are saying it means surveillance outside of the law, DID NOT HAPPEN.

Surveillance, authorized by a FISA court of law judge, occurred on Carter Page AFTER he had left the Trump campaign, and also occurred on Manafort BEFORE he ever went to work for the Trump campaign, NEITHER HAPPENED while they worked for the campaign.

Prove it or fuck off Prog.

Prove it did, dope.
There are many layers of safeguards, each with documentation. Show us.

 

[HaShev]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

Even with The illegal (abused)Fisa warrant you are not allowed to spy on U.S. civilians that are not the target of the warrant (Flynn was a civilian). In this case there were people set up, so as to spy on a campaign apponent during a campaign, weaponizing the Fisa to cheat /manipulate an election.
THIS IS THE VERY THING THAT WORRIED THE PUBLIC about it's potential abuses, and that's exactly what they did.

hello? the surveillance on the Russian Ambassador operative, HAS BEEN GOING ON since the day he showed up years ago... as it should have been.... the surveillance was not on Flynn?

Coming from Military intelligence, even Flynn had to know that there was surveillance on the Russian operative Ambassador....

MSM never tells the public it was Obama who sent Sessions to speak with the Russian Ambassador as part of his job, and they also leave out that the Ambassador is in the WH logs visiting the WH 22 times. If he was a threat would they allow that and ask yourself did they spy on Obama while tagging the Russian?
Ironically since the Russian set up the banker meeting that Kusher didn't bite on, The ones colluding with the Russians were the left who it appears used the ambassador as a double agent or st least use him to do their whim. Ask him if he was ever threatened deportation if he didn't play their game, oh yeah you can't, cause they sent him away hidden from questioning. HE HOLDS ONE OF THE KEYS TO EXPOSING OBAMAS INVOLVEMENT.

 

[easyt65]

Today when doing her best
Katharine Hepburn Tremor imitation, speaker Pelosi dared to rant and rave & question Barr's impartial & non partisan position as AG.
However, in doing so she inadvertantly exposed a standard that she and her collegues most violated and were violating in obstructing Barr from doing his job "FOR THE UNITED STATES" IN THE U.S. BEST INTEREST BEYOND ANY PARTY.
SHE ranted that Barr must do the job for the US as AG of the US not AG of Donald Trump, however if she mirrored that sentiment back she must admit that she and her collegues are to do the job for the US not their Party, and thus are the congress of the U.S. not the congress of Anti Trump and anti U.S. interests. Adam Schiff was heading the investigative committee for the US not the Resistance, he was far from non partisan unbiased as required and never recused himself for leaks and media slip ups.
Furthermore today they lied by saying there was no evidence of spying, when Obama and his official have admitted it under oath. According to U.S. law that spying was illegal when it spied on civilians and there was evidence of foul play in obtaining warrants and evidence of abuses of power warranting investigations.
What the Dems are doing is obstruction of justice especially in trying to oust Barr like they tried with Trump and everyone who helped him embarass them. If Pelosi had nothing to hide she would not care, and would not get so nervous to make such a blatant display of guilt while performing more evidence for prosecuters.
And Hey Pelosi, you also wacked yourself with your other boomerang thrown at the working conditions of immigrants in their native nations.
1) You are insulting those countries and those people, which does not help in diplomacy.
2)You have some nerve talking about working conditions when your slave farm labor at your vineyard is deplorable.
This is a picture of what your farm labor car pool would look something like. *L*
View attachment 255185

what's the definition of ''spying''? Is spying legal, like FISA warrants for surveillance, approved by a FISA court judge?

Or is so called ''spying'' something illegal, done outside of the framing of the law?

Even with The illegal (abused)Fisa warrant you are not allowed to spy on U.S. civilians that are not the target of the warrant (Flynn was a civilian). In this case there were people set up, so as to spy on a campaign apponent during a campaign, weaponizing the Fisa to cheat /manipulate an election.
THIS IS THE VERY THING THAT WORRIED THE PUBLIC about it's potential abuses, and that's exactly what they did.

They have spied in civilians, even ones not under investigation. The FBI admitted that when FBI Director MUELLER was hauled before a Secret FISA Court in 2014...