Pelosi Attack 'Over', The Truth Dies With DOJ / FBI Taking over the Case

[OldFlame]

You clearly don’t understand anything being discussed here.

There are many, many federal officials.

There are many times more family members of federal officials.

The families of federal officials are all covered under 18 USC 115.

That’s too many people for the secret service to protect.

I don’t know that I can make it any easier for you to understand.

Yet you haven't shown this at all. It didn't influence anything, it didn't impede anything, and there's no proof there was any intent of retaliation either. So it does not fall under this at all.

'Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official'​

by threatening or injuring a family member.​

It is your position that there was no security at all at the Pelosi mansion the night he was 'attacked', no security cameras in use, no footage?

 

[Marener]

Yet you haven't shown this at all. It didn't influence anything, it didn't impede anything, and there's no proof there was any intent of retaliation either. So it does not fall under this at all.

'Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official'​

by threatening or injuring a family member.​

It is your position that there was no security at all at the Pelosi mansion the night he was 'attacked', no security cameras in use, no footage?

Nancy Pelosi was the target and the attacker wanted to affect her function as a government official. The attack on Paul was a part of that intent.

I have no idea what security was present or what footage exists or the attack.

 

[OldFlame]

Nancy Pelosi was the target and the attacker wanted to affect her function as a government official. The attack on Paul was a part of that intent.

I have no idea what security was present or what footage exists or the attack.

She was the target, but there was no SS or security there at all? Which is it? lol

You'd have to believe that there was no security there for this guy to get in and attack anyone. Why would there be no security at the speaker's residence?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Man Charged with Assault and Attempted Kidnapping Following Breaking and Entering of Pelosi Residence

A California man was charged today with assault and attempted kidnapping in violation of federal law in connection with the break-in at the residence of Nancy and Paul Pelosi in San Francisco on Friday.

www.justice.gov

Your argument is that there are no security cameras on the Pelosi property pointing at this HUGE BANK OF GLASS DOORS?

GTFO. You are being so disingenuous.

 

[Marener]

She was the target, but there was no SS or security there at all? Which is it? lol

You'd have to believe that there was no security there for this guy to get in and attack anyone. Why would there be no security at the speaker's residence?

I have no idea what security existed at the house.

 

[Marener]

Your argument is that there are no security cameras on the Pelosi property pointing at this HUGE BANK OF GLASS DOORS?

I didn’t make an argument. I just asked a question.

You’re making assumptions. That’s it.

 

[OldFlame]

I have no idea what security existed at the house.

The Speaker, 3rd in line to the presidency, and no SS or any other security of any kind? Can you say gullible?

 

[Marener]

The Speaker, 3rd in line to the presidency, and no SS or any other security of any kind? Can you say gullible?

Did my statement confuse you? I said I don’t know what security is at the house.

As has been pointed out, Paul Pelosi is not a government official and Nancy Pelosi was not there.

 

[OldFlame]

Did my statement confuse you? I said I don’t know what security is at the house.

As has been pointed out, Paul Pelosi is not a government official and Nancy Pelosi was not there.

Yet it was a 'federal' crime... I rest my case.

 

[Marener]

Yet it was a 'federal' crime... I rest my case.

Yes. According to the statute.

 

[OldFlame]

Yes. According to the statute.

No, it wasn't, I've already addressed that, you had no answer, you had no proof.

 

[Marener]

No, it wasn't, I've already addressed that, you had no answer, you had no proof.

You didn’t address it. You just made some unrelated comment about secret service that is totally irrelevant.

 

[DudleySmith]

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1548106/download

You have nothing.

You have far less. But you Touched Me Last!!! lol

 

[bripat9643]

The Secret Service do not protect Paul Pelosi.

Frequently Asked Questions About Us

The United States Secret Service, one of the nation's oldest federal investigative law enforcement agencies, was founded in 1865 as a branch of the U.S. Treasury Department.

www.secretservice.gov

I saw a news program that said the SS watches the Pelosi house

 

[Marener]

I saw a news program that said the SS watches the Pelosi house

Sure.

 

[lantern2814]

I never claimed anything of the such.

You said that post was fantasy. Now you say it isn’t. Make up your mind.

 

[lantern2814]

You are a complete moron.

No, you are the moron. As always. Paul Pelosi is not a federal official and Nancy wasn’t there. Meaning your drivel is pointless.

 

[lantern2814]

Then where is the confusion?

Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official by threatening or injuring a family member​

Paul Pelosi is a family member of a federal official.

Your conveniently left off the part about while performing official duties. That means this can NOT be a federal case.

 

[Marener]

Your conveniently left off the part about while performing official duties. That means this can NOT be a federal case.

That’s part B. Go back and read part A.

(A)
assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder a member of the immediate family of a United States official, aUnited States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under section 1114 of this title;

Section B may be applicable because it also contains this:
or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

You’re a moron. Don’t start. It’ll go badly.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Stinks to high heavens. Activists in the FBI/DOJ could very well be trying to cover something up, especially given their activist track record.