Pelosi Attack 'Over', The Truth Dies With DOJ / FBI Taking over the Case

[Blaster]

You are an intellectual coward that talks shit and doesn’t back it up.

Nobody here agrees with you.

 

[Marener]

Projection again.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1548106/download

You have nothing.

 

[Marener]

Nobody here agrees with you.

Because you’re all intellectual cowards who can’t think for yourselves.

You’re just a bunch of morons being led by your masters.

 

[bripat9643]

You have the Gateway Pundit. I have the DoJ.

There’s no comparison.

True The Gateway Pundit is far more credible than the DOJ.

 

[Blaster]

Because you’re all intellectual cowards who can’t think for yourselves.

You’re just a bunch of morons being led by your masters.

You are just angry because everyone here has made you look foolish.

 

[OldFlame]

Read the goddamn statute you morons.

Where was the secret service? You're insinuating that the 3rd person from the presidency wasn't protected by the SS. Guess they just had the night off? lol

 

[Marener]

You are just angry because everyone here has made you look foolish.

It’s impossible for you morons to make anyone look foolish.

 

[Marener]

Where was the secret service? You're insinuating that the 3rd person from the presidency wasn't protected by the SS. Guess they just had the night off? lol

The Secret Service do not protect Paul Pelosi.

Frequently Asked Questions About Us

The United States Secret Service, one of the nation's oldest federal investigative law enforcement agencies, was founded in 1865 as a branch of the U.S. Treasury Department.

www.secretservice.gov

 

[OldFlame]

Because you’re all intellectual cowards who can’t think for yourselves.

You’re just a bunch of morons being led by your masters.

And you're a left wing lunatic shill, most likely being paid by the post.

 

[OldFlame]

The Secret Service do not protect Paul Pelosi.

Frequently Asked Questions About Us

The United States Secret Service, one of the nation's oldest federal investigative law enforcement agencies, was founded in 1865 as a branch of the U.S. Treasury Department.

www.secretservice.gov

Why not?

 

[Marener]

And you're a left wing lunatic shill, most likely being paid by the post.

You’re paranoid and lazy.

Do some reading before you post. You’ll look less idiotic.

 

[Marener]

Why not?

Not authorized by statute. Read the link you lazy moron.

 

[Blaster]

Do some reading before you post. You’ll look less idiotic.

You always look idiotic.

 

[OldFlame]

Not authorized by statute. Read the link you lazy moron.

Why is it not authorized by the statute?

 

[Marener]

Why is it not authorized by the statute?

Why would it be?

 

[OldFlame]

Why would it be?

You apparently think he's covered under the statute that you've linked to ad nauseam this entire thread, so why is he covered under yours, but not the one regarding the SS?

 

[Marener]

You apparently think he's covered under the statute that you've linked to ad nauseam this entire thread, so why is he covered under yours, but not the one regarding the SS?

Because 18 USC 115 covers a massive number of people, far more than the secret service would ever be able to provide security for.

 

[OldFlame]

Because 18 USC 115 covers a massive number of people, far more than the secret service would ever be able to provide security for.

Wow, I was wondering what bullshit reply you would come up with, it took you a while. So you're implying that someone who isn't a federal official is covered under your statute that cites 'federal officials' specifically, but suddenly he's 'one of a massive number of people' that the SS doesn't protect, regardless that you think he's important enough as a spouse of the Speaker to be covered under the statute you quoted? Talk about taking 'logic' to the pretzel level in order to justify your bullshit conclusions. You really need to get a different job, you're not so good at this one.

 

[Moonglow]

So you’re claiming Nancy was there you idiotic troll? And that a federal agent was there too? Seems you’re the one pushing fantasies.

I never claimed anything of the such.

 

[Marener]

Wow, I was wondering what bullshit reply you would come up with, it took you a while. So you're implying that someone who isn't a federal official is covered under your statute that cites 'federal officials' specifically, but suddenly he's 'one of a massive number of people' that the SS doesn't protect, regardless that you think he's important enough as a spouse of the Speaker to be covered under the statute you quoted? Talk about taking 'logic' to the pretzel level in order to justify your bullshit conclusions. You really need to get a different job, you're not so good at this one.

You clearly don’t understand anything being discussed here.

There are many, many federal officials.

There are many times more family members of federal officials.

The families of federal officials are all covered under 18 USC 115.

That’s too many people for the secret service to protect.

I don’t know that I can make it any easier for you to understand.