- Thread starter
- #121
Who'd you vote for?That makes them largely no different than MAGA GOPers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who'd you vote for?That makes them largely no different than MAGA GOPers.
That is an unbelievably naive UNAMERICAN response.
As shown by the investigative reporter , the MOSSAD/CIA provided President Trump a FALSE ADULTERATED IAEA REPORT which he used to arbitrarily bomb Iran and which was subsequently diavowed by the IAEA.
Furthermore , a Fox News 4 part series televised on 12/2001 showed that the Mossad refused to share its 09/11 intel and then CELEBRATED AFTER WE WERE HIT
How then can you state that the Mossad is on the side of America - UNBELIEVABLE - that was an asinine response
It sure put you in your place, huh?Prove that you're not lying by re-posting an old post of you praising any Democrat in office.
Did you take note of the recent election?You refuse to live in reality. He didn't get 50% in any of the 3 elections. But Joe Biden did!![]()
No vulgarity even when I destroy your bias.HUH?
What the fucketh
NO LAW MANDATES PARTICIPATION IN THE NPT - IRAN IS A >>>>>>VOLUNTARY<<<<<MEMBER AND I HOPE THEY DISCONTINUE ITS MEMBERSHIP/PARTICIPATION
Why are you incapable of addressing a post honestly? All you do is deflect through spamming.Do you not know that the richest have always been Democrat supporters?
You don't read, do you.
The Democrat Party is the party of the rich.
“Democratic Party Won't Admit It's Become the Party of Wealth Democratic Party Won't Admit It's Become the Party of Wealth
Democrats Are the Party of Corporate Oligarchs
The average American is being crushed by leftist Big Government and Big Business.
![]()
The average American is being crushed by leftist Big Government and Big Business.
patriotpost.us
“The two parties are switching class constituents. Some 65% of the Americans making more than $500,000 a year are Democrats, and 74% of those who earn less than $100,000 a year are Republicans, according to IRS statistics. Gone are the days of working people automatically voting Democratic, or Republicans being caricatured as a party of stockbrokers on golf courses.
By 2018, Democratic representatives were in control of all 20 of the wealthiest congressional districts. In the recent presidential primaries and general election, 17 of the 20 wealthiest ZIP codes gave more money to Democratic candidates than to Republicans.” Democrats Are Now the Party of Wealthy, Woke Elitists
“The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin
Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.
- In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
- And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
- And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
- “They're for the powerful, we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
- This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
- As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! [p. 8]
- Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).
Bradley Foundation, $623 million.
Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.
- Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.
Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.
The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.
Top Ten Donors, 2016 Campaign:
- With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
- “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions… The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/scaifemain050299.htm
Fahr LLC, Renaissance Technologies, Paloma Partners, Newsweb Corp., NextGen Climate, Priorities USA, Soros …..to the Democrats: $311 million
Los Vegas Sands, Adelson Clinic, Elliott Management, Renaissance Technologies….to Republicans: $110 million
Organization Profiles
![]()
- Soros money supported and catalyzed theMcCain-Feingold Act, which banned ‘soft money,’ stripping the two major parties of their financial base. This allowed Soros to create a “Shadow Party,” designed to funnel massive amounts of capital into organizations that would assume the role that the political parties traditionally played.
- A 527 group is a private, tax-exempt political organization set up under Section 527 of the U.S. tax code. Such groups have been around for years but never took center stage until 2004, when they became major players. That's because McCain-Feingold shut the door on unlimited contributions (so-called "soft money") to political parties, so that many of the big-dollar donations began flowing to 527 groups instead. McCain-Feingold at Rest
How so?It sure put you in your place, huh?
Yes. Trump got less than 50% of the vote.Did you take note of the recent election?
You don't make the rules. You are incapable of honest debate.No vulgarity even when I destroy your bias.
Assuming you mean at the potus level, my last vote was for shrub in 2000. Lying weasel broke me of the habit. Taught me that the lesser of two evils is none the less evil.Who'd you vote for?
I don't see where your inability to understaned an articulate reponse is my prob.Why are you incapable of addressing a post honestly? All you do is deflect through spamming.
Yet wiped the floor with your party.Yes. Trump got less than 50% of the vote.
I'm fine with leaving that determination up to our readers.You don't make the rules. You are incapable of honest debate.
But you are low IQ, which is amusing.
So you haven't had skin in the game for over 20 years?Assuming you mean at the potus level, my last vote was for shrub in 2000. Lying weasel broke me of the habit. Taught me that the lesser of two evils is none the less evil.
Go **** yourselfSo you haven't had skin in the game for over 20 years?
Get lost and stop wasting bytes.
Is that the language with which you were raises?Go **** yourself
HUH?Why does Iran have an intercontinental ballistic missile program???
Shirley you jest .No vulgarity even when I destroy your bias.
Stop tap dancing and answer the question, bigot.HUH?
WTF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Show me where Iran has a ballistic missile with a range exceeding 2000 Kms (1300 mi) , ie, an ICBM .
Now Iran has regular ballistic missiles because they , don't trust anyone - specially their ASS-k-NAZI neighbors.
Are you denying your anti-Semitism?Shirley you jest .
I did not see where you show that I have a bias nor did I see you destroy anything . I saw lots of these:
Stonewalling = a communication style characterized by a refusal to address an issue during a debate or conflict .
Issue avoidance = a coping mechanism where individuals avoid confronting problems, stressful situations, or difficult emotions