ummm..... I DID watch the entire debate 2X. First on the radio THEN I located it on cspan video library archive.
Needless to say, Krugman mopped the floor w/ his Randian adversaries.
Wonder if Ryan (R) came out & told the truth that he indeed DOES worship the philandering atheist- Ayn Rand since he threw her under the bus in the election?
That would be your opinion. And you know how much thinking people value your opinion.
Oh so you watched it but didn't understand a thing that was said...
You know that is the scariest part, you think he so smart but you cannot comprehend a thing that was said, no wonder you keep drinking the Kool Aid...
That would be your opinion. And you know how much thinking people value your opinion.
Oh so you watched it but didn't understand a thing that was said...
You know that is the scariest part, you think he so smart but you cannot comprehend a thing that was said, no wonder you keep drinking the Kool Aid...
Here. Read these. They help to explain your malady:That would be your opinion. And you know how much thinking people value your opinion.
Oh so you watched it but didn't understand a thing that was said...
You know that is the scariest part, you think he so smart but you cannot comprehend a thing that was said, no wonder you keep drinking the Kool Aid...
Well since your not a thinking person who cares what you think?
That question is an oxymoron. Accusing someone of responding with the written equivalent of muscle memory i. e. unthinkingly, how could you dismiss his non-existent thinking? While given that he responded without pointing out that logical fallacy does lend credence to your first statement the second half of your question should be either "I need to contact someone who is to answer that last statement." or "you are not among those who know."That would be your opinion. And you know how much thinking people value your opinion.
Oh so you watched it but didn't understand a thing that was said...
You know that is the scariest part, you think he so smart but you cannot comprehend a thing that was said, no wonder you keep drinking the Kool Aid...
Well since your not a thinking person who cares what you think?
I knew it, ed. I predicted you would prove that you do not have a clue what demand, in an economic sense, is. And you came through. Good job.
Yup. Problem that the cons have with all of the studies shoing that they are less than brilliant includes that they hate science, and that they can not find counterbalancing studies saying that they are smart. All of the studies end up with very similar findings. But what is REALLY funny is that when you try to help them out by pointing out the obvious, they get all out of sorts. Stumble all over themselves.
that would explain the low IQ, EdwardBaiamonte's of the interwebz
BTW- cons are also suffer from epistemic closure
No, ed. Your same try as always. You bring up a book by a known right wing nut case. Not a book, dipshit. A study. If necessary, I can explain the difference. But you could try to google it. But thanks again for showing that there are no studies out there showing that cons are smarter than liberals. You always seem to be able to help.
Let me translate your drivel for those trying to understand it. Someone (in this case, me) tried to help GWV, and it has him all out of source. And since GWV can find no studies saying that cons like him are smarter than liberals. So it makes him nuts. And he starts with the juvinile attacks. Poor guy can not help himself. He is a con. Not his fault. Just plain bad luck.
