Patricia Smith, mother of Benghazi victim - Republican National Convention

[Faun]

Ok quote me that email where Clinton states that video causing these attacks is a lie.

She told Chelsea it was a PLANNED TERRORIST attack. Then she tells us it was a spontaneous protest brought on because of a video. If you don't see the lie, then I cannot help you.

That's not a lie, ya moron.

Information kept changing as it was coming in.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf​

... damn, you people are thick.

Sadly after the report the email came out during her treasonous email scandal. She emailed Chelsea saying it was a terrorist attack, then walked right out and told us it was a protest for over a week. Quit making yourself look ignorant.

What part of, "there was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks," don't you understand?

And the email of which you speak spurred Trey Gowdy to start up the 8th Congressional investigation into Benghazi which concluded earlier this month. Show me where in that report it says Hillary lied....

So the intel didn't change for over a week? That's how long the spewed the movie bullshit, why she told Chelsea it was a terrorist attack on the first night, she didn't change that.

What part of, "the CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, which was after that week you state Hillary spoke of the protest, don't you understand?

 

[jknowgood]

She told Chelsea it was a PLANNED TERRORIST attack. Then she tells us it was a spontaneous protest brought on because of a video. If you don't see the lie, then I cannot help you.

That's not a lie, ya moron.

Information kept changing as it was coming in.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf​

... damn, you people are thick.

Sadly after the report the email came out during her treasonous email scandal. She emailed Chelsea saying it was a terrorist attack, then walked right out and told us it was a protest for over a week. Quit making yourself look ignorant.

What part of, "there was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks," don't you understand?

And the email of which you speak spurred Trey Gowdy to start up the 8th Congressional investigation into Benghazi which concluded earlier this month. Show me where in that report it says Hillary lied....

So the intel didn't change for over a week? That's how long the spewed the movie bullshit, why she told Chelsea it was a terrorist attack on the first night, she didn't change that.

What part of, "the CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, which was after that week you state Hillary spoke of the protest, don't you understand?

They told the lie about the video for over a week. So l ask you as you stated the intel changed multiple times, so why didn't they tell us different? But they told family members and heads of states it was a terrorist attack from the beginning. We found this out after the initial investigation. Quit looking like a fool and admit Hillary and Obama are nothing but liars.

 

[Faun]

That's not a lie, ya moron.

Information kept changing as it was coming in.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf​

... damn, you people are thick.

Sadly after the report the email came out during her treasonous email scandal. She emailed Chelsea saying it was a terrorist attack, then walked right out and told us it was a protest for over a week. Quit making yourself look ignorant.

What part of, "there was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks," don't you understand?

And the email of which you speak spurred Trey Gowdy to start up the 8th Congressional investigation into Benghazi which concluded earlier this month. Show me where in that report it says Hillary lied....

So the intel didn't change for over a week? That's how long the spewed the movie bullshit, why she told Chelsea it was a terrorist attack on the first night, she didn't change that.

What part of, "the CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, which was after that week you state Hillary spoke of the protest, don't you understand?

They told the lie about the video for over a week. So l ask you as you stated the intel changed multiple times, so why didn't they tell us different? But they told family members and heads of states it was a terrorist attack from the beginning. We found this out after the initial investigation. Quit looking like a fool and admit Hillary and Obama are nothing but liars.

This has already been explained multiple times to you. You still don't get it. You're not bright enough to get it. Conflicting reports were coming in the night of the attack. At one point, it was believed to be a pre-planned terrorist attack. With that information, Hillary sends email to Chelsea. At some point shortly after, the belief is that the attack was a protest over a video. I just ******* showed you, "the CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012." I can't help you understand that 9.24.2012 was almost 2 weeks after the attack until the CIA determined it wasn't the video. Hillary, Obama, and Rice were reported what the CIA was telling them. The liar here is you, not Hillary.

And again.... that email to Chelsea spurred the 8th GOP Benghazi investigation. Trey Gowdy was eager to nail Hillary to the wall over it in an election season...... show me where his final report concluded she lied....

You can't. That's why you don't. That's because you're the liar, not Hillary.

 

[jknowgood]

Sadly after the report the email came out during her treasonous email scandal. She emailed Chelsea saying it was a terrorist attack, then walked right out and told us it was a protest for over a week. Quit making yourself look ignorant.

What part of, "there was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks," don't you understand?

And the email of which you speak spurred Trey Gowdy to start up the 8th Congressional investigation into Benghazi which concluded earlier this month. Show me where in that report it says Hillary lied....

So the intel didn't change for over a week? That's how long the spewed the movie bullshit, why she told Chelsea it was a terrorist attack on the first night, she didn't change that.

What part of, "the CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, which was after that week you state Hillary spoke of the protest, don't you understand?

They told the lie about the video for over a week. So l ask you as you stated the intel changed multiple times, so why didn't they tell us different? But they told family members and heads of states it was a terrorist attack from the beginning. We found this out after the initial investigation. Quit looking like a fool and admit Hillary and Obama are nothing but liars.

This has already been explained multiple times to you. You still don't get it. You're not bright enough to get it. Conflicting reports were coming in the night of the attack. At one point, it was believed to be a pre-planned terrorist attack. With that information, Hillary sends email to Chelsea. At some point shortly after, the belief is that the attack was a protest over a video. I just ******* showed you, "the CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012." I can't help you understand that 9.24.2012 was almost 2 weeks after the attack until the CIA determined it wasn't the video. Hillary, Obama, and Rice were reported what the CIA was telling them. The liar here is you, not Hillary.

And again.... that email to Chelsea spurred the 8th GOP Benghazi investigation. Trey Gowdy was eager to nail Hillary to the wall over it in an election season...... show me where his final report concluded she lied....

You can't. That's why you don't. That's because you're the liar, not Hillary.

Okay you proved you point saying Hillary isn't a liar. Also since when did you start believing the cia?

 

[BlindBoo]

Yeah right except there was no video lie.

It was a lie, on the night of the attack, Hillary emailed Chelsea and said so. She lied while people died.

Quote the lie then. There was a militia with some kind of ties to al Qaeda that claimed responsibility that night. Nobody died because of what Sec. Clinton said after the attack. Nothing like the previous administration's lying to get the public behind the invasion of Iraq, where the lies really did cost many lives and other casualties. Leave it to Republican Rubes to get behind the obvious lies about Sec. Clinton.

The lie came the day after the attack, when they said it was a movie that caused the attack. Hillary was also saying the same as Bush, you know the former first lady?

I don't recall anyone saying that. That certainly isn't in any official transcript or statement. They did speculate that it was a group of extremist who took advantage of a protest that they thought was going on, similar to the ones erupting all across the region, like the Muslim cartoon riots a few years before. There were riots all over the Muslim world over that stupid video clip. So they were wrong about the protest. They admitted that years ago. The whole phony scandal has been a farce from day one. But the poutrage machine has been finely turned and Americans are more divided than ever.

Just think, if they both didn't lie to begin with. There would be no scandal. Being democrats, that is impossible though.

As reported by the AP and Fox News.

TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) — A Libyan Interior Ministry official says armed men have stormed the US consulate in east Libya's Benghazi and set it ablaze after a protest against a video deemed insulting to Islam's prophet, Muhammad, which was reportedly produced in America

Libyans angry over film set fire to US consulate

 

[thanatos144]

POWERFUL!

Is she a registered idiot or just a freelancer?

We all know you are a REGISTERED IDIOT....You will vote for this murderer!

And Yet Trump fully supported her even after a BLACK man became president.

 

[BlindBoo]

Sadly, you remain incredibly rightarded ... again ... for the benefit of the hard of learning ... I believed the GOP's 8 investigations. They concluded the story about the video came from our intelligence community.

I knew it was a terrorist attack from the start. I am smarter than all of Obama's guys. Imagine that.

That's not evidenced by your posts.

Uh everyone knew it was a terrorist attack including obama....Noone is that stupid....you really believed a youtube video caused it...seriously?if

Tell the CIA they are that stupid. They were the ones to say it was the video.

They also said Iraq had wmd's, right?

Nope. It was never their conclusion.

On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq. The information, moreover, was not circulated within the CIA among those agents involved in operations to prove whether Saddam had WMD.

On April 23, 2006, CBS’s “60 Minutes” interviewed Tyler Drumheller, the former CIA chief of clandestine operations for Europe, who disclosed that the agency had received documentary intelligence from Naji Sabri, Saddam’s foreign minister, that Saddam did not have WMD. “We continued to validate him the whole way through,” said Drumheller. “The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy, to justify the policy.”

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction