Parents & Teachers Need To Tell Kids That Gays & SCOTUS Are Wrong

[protectionist]

This is no time for parents, teachers, clergy, counselers, sports coaches and any adults who children look to for guidance, to be silent. This is NOT the time for people to try to be uninvolved. The gay disease and its supporters in half of the Supreme Court must be denounced loud and clear, for the foolish and mistaken notion that homosexuality has any validity at all. Kids, age 13 and older, should be carefully counseled to stop this plague of false thought from infecting their young minds.

With a Supreme Court ruling in favor of same sex marriage, it is now much easier for pervert gays to spread their sickness to children by using the Supreme Court decision as a tool to denormalize kids, much the same way that Muslim propagandists use freedom of speech to spread their hateful and destructive message of Islam, spread by Muslim Brotherhood groups.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Parents & Teachers Need To Tell Kids That Gays & SCOTUS Are Wrong

Only, most don't believe that, just morons like you do. Well, morons like you and those four others on the SC who acted like children in this case, literally.

 

[G.T.]

My children will be taught to treat gay people the same as they want to be treated themselves, and you cannot do shit about it bigot.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Time to get over gays being your equals old man, since they are and by law almost are. Your world here has ended, and all you can do is cry your bitter tears and rant...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Our children knew it was wrong before the SCOTUS ruling.

 

[Mac1958]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

 

[martybegan]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

 

[Mac1958]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

Huh?

Straw man much?

.

 

[martybegan]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

Huh?

Straw man much?

.

Answer the question.

 

[Mac1958]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

Huh?

Straw man much?

.

Answer the question.

Sure, no.

Now answer mine. Straw man much?

.

 

[G.T.]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

 

[martybegan]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I'll just tell them that the SC has made mistakes before, dred scott, jim crow, prohibition, abortion, gay marriage and so on and....... will continue to make mistakes.. No big deal.

 

[G.T.]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

The will of the people is meaningless when it comes to rights. Tyranny of the majority doesnt win.

B: theres no "my side." That's a rude and uncouth insinuation on your part.

 

[Mac1958]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

Who appoints the supes?

Elected officials.

.

 

[martybegan]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

The will of the people is meaningless when it comes to rights. Tyranny of the majority doesnt win.

B: theres no "my side." That's a rude and uncouth insinuation on your part.

Tyranny of the federal government won in this case.

I guess I have to decide I have the right to bop people in the head with a foam pillow. ITS A RIGHT DAMMIT

Your side, as seen on this board is the side of tyranny and force.

 

[reconmark]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

This is the same tired old bullshit Conservatives have been spouting via the 200 tears between slavery and equal rights for Black people and minorities.
"A little more time" is simply Conservatives way of saying 'not in your lifetime."

 

[martybegan]

Maybe instead tell the kids that elections matter, that if they really want to change things they have to convince others too, and that if they keep losing at the ballot box perhaps they're in the minority on the issues. Sometimes self-reflection is a good thing. Humility is generally a positive.

So minority protections are only for minorities you support and agree with?

Good to know.

This is a non sequitur.

It's not at all. Evidently things your side like are either protected eternally by the courts, or easily achieved via voting for it with the majority, or by courts who decide something is what they like, so they make up stuff to justify it.

Gay marriage could have been made legal via legislative lobbying and time, as it was done in several states. The court in this case actually overrode the will of the people in several states, so Mac's statement on convincing others is on its, face bullhockey.

Who appoints the supes?

Elected officials.

.

At the federal level, and that separates them so far the people that it basically removes any responsibility to the people from them.

We are one more justice away from losing any rights those not of a progressive bent hold dear. Revolutions have been built on less.

 

[G.T.]

Old curmudgeons see these changes to our Country - gay rights, weed legalization, the push for prostitution and gambling being legalized.......

As some destructive path - whereas, in reality, it's such things as those that enhance freedom.

Yourself, your children etc. In the end posess the power of whether or not you will partake in these new freedoms and - ironically, youll no longer be able to use the law to stop others from doing so.

America won. Old people with chips on their shoulders living a life of selfish cynacism lost. Good.

 

[Moonglow]

The OP does not understand that even kids can see second class citizen positions forced on certain members of society..