The situation was deteriorating in Bhengazi....other countries were pulling out their people......the Secretary of State is responsible for embassy security.....repeated requests had been placed with her for more security.....an embassy, or an ambassador in a country in the state of ruin as libya required a full complement of Marines and even more......this embassy had a bare handful of security personel...and requests for more securtiy were denied.....they had embassy security experts tell them that if security was not increased people were going to die.....they did not increase security...
The night of the attack help was requested...and no help was ever sent......
You see, Dick Tiny, you keep calling this an "embassy", but it wasn't an embassy. Benghazi is not the capital of Libya, Tripoli is. What we had in Benghazi was a diplomatic mission, which is not the same thing as an embassy.
Now, why is this important? Because what you had was Ambassador Stevens choosing ot leave his nice, safe Embassy in Tripoli to go to this mission in Benghazi, despite the supposed instability, despite the fact that there riots in the rest of the region over the notorious video (which apparently nobody in Benghazi was actually upset about, no really) despite the fact it was the 11th Anniversary of 9/11.
In short, the guy on the ground felt it was safe to go, but Hillary should have known this was far too dangerous and put a stop to it.
This is your argument, right, Dick Tiny?