Here is a bowl of delicious m&ms.
Minor problem, one of them is a deadly poison which will kill you.
Now, the Question is, do you gamble and eat a serving?
Trick question: A serving is the whole bowl. If we eat the whole bowl so of US will die.
There is no doubt about that.
If you choose to eat the bowl, you choose to die.
By that logic, we are all M&M's, aren't we?
Hey, we have a million gun owners. But ONE of them is an Adam Lanza. Or a Joker HOlmes. Or a Loughner or a Cho.
Here's the thing about your spurious logic, guy. There's nothing a terrorist can do to end America. Violence is bad, yes, but we have plenty of violence being perpetrated by non-Muslims, every day.
The thing is, you guys say we need to tolerate a certain amount of violence from Gun Nuts - about 33,000 gun deaths a year, 70,000 gun injuries, etc - because we have this Second Amendment and 240 years ago, some guy who shit in a chamber pot couldn't define a militia properly.
But you'd happily throw out the First Amendment because a few members of a religion go nuts when we bomb women and children in other countries who belong to the same religion.
Because trying something as breathtakingly rational as "not bombing other countries that aren't our problem" is just unthinkable. We wouldn't want them to think we are weak or anything, the Zionists and Oil Company whisper in your ear.