Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She just admitted this was nothing but a political hit against Trump. She is a liar and they will target any organization or individual they deem a threat to them.
Does Anyone Believe This?... New York Governor Tells Businesses "They Have Nothing to Fear" After Democrat State Leaders Fleece Donald Trump of $355 Million | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
New York Governor Kathy Hochul attempted to reassure business owners in New York that they have nothing to fear after the state’s Attorney General fleeced $355 million from President Trump for running a business in the state.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Broke a "law" that Governor Hochul declared wouldn't be used against anyone else, Slade? My point was that when she admitted that (trying desperately to stem the tide of wealthy people heading for the exits from New York State!) she was admitting that what James just pulled off with her pet judge was blatant selective prosecution! Of course a biased judge means an unjust ruling! We just witnessed it! That's not me muddying anything...that's just me pointing out the obvious!She got a win because she proved he broke the law. Plain and simple. Biased judge does not mean unjust ruling. I know yall like to muddy the water there, but that’s a fact.
I didn’t hear say that. Maybe I missed it. Can you point to her quote?Broke a "law" that Governor Hochul declared wouldn't be used against anyone else, Slade?
Of course not… DT demonized that judge and public ally talked shit about his aid from the start. It’s impossible not to be biased after that. Doesn’t mean his rulings won’t follow the law and stay within his powers.Of course a biased judge means an unjust ruling!
If a judge can't be impartial then he or she has no business presiding over a trial. If you're claiming that this judge WAS impartial but became biased because of Trump's behavior that I don't think you followed the trial, Slade! Engeron was biased against Trump before the trial started and displayed that bias throughout the trial.Of course not… DT demonized that judge and public ally talked shit about his aid from the start. It’s impossible not to be biased after that. Doesn’t mean his rulings won’t follow the law and stay within his powers.
Frankly the fact the Donny provoked so hard just shows how disturbed of a person he is. That’s what happens when you antagonize law enforcement.
So in your world it was fine for Letetia James to hold forth outside the courtroom each day about the wrong doings of Donald Trump but not OK for him to respond to what was going on in the courtroom?Of course not… DT demonized that judge and public ally talked shit about his aid from the start. It’s impossible not to be biased after that. Doesn’t mean his rulings won’t follow the law and stay within his powers.
Frankly the fact the Donny provoked so hard just shows how disturbed of a person he is. That’s what happens when you antagonize law enforcement.
Now you’re changing words. Biased is a different word than impartial. I’m making the argument that one can be biased, dislike somebody, yet still be impartial and uphold their oath to uphold the law . You’re saying that’s not possible but you are wrongIf a judge can't be impartial then he or she has no business presiding over a trial. If you're claiming that this judge WAS impartial but became biased because of Trump's behavior that I don't think you followed the trial, Slade! Engeron was biased against Trump before the trial started and displayed that bias throughout the trial.
I thought we were talking about the judge… now we are talking about James?!So in your world it was fine for Letetia James to hold forth outside the courtroom each day about the wrong doings of Donald Trump but not OK for him to respond to what was going on in the courtroom?
So James could "talk shit" and no gag order was imposed by the judge while Trump was not allowed to speak? That's not "discretion"...that's a show trial.I thought we were talking about the judge… now we are talking about James?!
I never said it wasn’t ok for Trump to talk shit. He can say whatever he wants. He did cross the line and endanger the aid so the gag order was just… but in general he can say what he wants.
I’m saying he was a moron to choose to talk shit and provoke a judge. He was asking for the hammer to get dropped. The judge had discretion. Trump make sure he would get the worst of it by the way he acted.
Self inflicted wound
Now you’re changing words. Biased is a different word than impartial. I’m making the argument that one can be biased, dislike somebody, yet still be impartial and uphold their oath to uphold the law . You’re saying that’s not possible but you are wrong.
Trump wasn’t allowed to speak because he was putting a woman in danger by what he was saying. If James broke any rules by what she was saying then Trump can sue. But I don’t think she didSo James could "talk shit" and no gag order was imposed by the judge while Trump was not allowed to speak? That's not "discretion"...that's a show trial.
Yeah, I didn’t see anything done that fell outside the law or his scope of power. His verdict was explained and justified and based on the lawAre you really claiming that Engeron was impartial?
Based on the law? More like "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime!" This entire farce is like something out of a Soviet show trial, Slade! You've got a charge that nobody else has ever been charged with and if we're to believe Governor Hochul...nobody else ever WILL be charged with! Why is that? Why was this a civil case and not a criminal case? You know THAT answer as well as I do...because there was no "crime"!Yeah, I didn’t see anything done that fell outside the law or his scope of power. His verdict was explained and justified and based on the law
Oh don’t eat up those pathetic talking points. Nothing Russian about this. Trump put himself in the spotlight, his choice. He entered the political ring and sought power. He used the power and position to talk shit, demean and troll anybody who stood in his way. Instead of forging good relationships he divided and he made himself a target. So if the big shining spotlight get more attention than the common man then that’s how it works.Based on the law? More like "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime!" This entire farce is like something out of a Soviet show trial, Slade! You've got a charge that nobody else has ever been charged with and if we're to believe Governor Hochul...nobody else ever WILL be charged with! Why is that? Why was this a civil case and not a criminal case? You know THAT answer as well as I do...because there was no "crime"!
You're literally explaining trumps whoas… he pissed off 80 million Americans and is facing blowback.You can't piss off over 80 million Americans and not have blowback.... that's the libs problem... they think everyone thinks like them... but they are the minority and they will find this out in November...
If the judge ruled more harshly because of simple rhetoric then I would hardly say he’s impartial.I thought we were talking about the judge… now we are talking about James?!
I never said it wasn’t ok for Trump to talk shit. He can say whatever he wants. He did cross the line and endanger the aid so the gag order was just… but in general he can say what he wants.
I’m saying he was a moron to choose to talk shit and provoke a judge. He was asking for the hammer to get dropped. The judge had discretion. Trump make sure he would get the worst of it by the way he acted.
Self inflicted wound
