Palestinians Reject Two State Solution

[P F Tinmore]

By citizen of palestine the LoN meant citizen of the mandate of palestine

Link?

Read the mandate of palestine and the order in council, they have both been supplied quite a lot of times

I have and they do not say what you think. And you always duck out when I ask you to quote the passage.

 

[Phoenall]

So the topic is they refuse to have their own land generously offered by Israel?

WRONG they refused to have 78% of palestine generously offered by the LoN, and instead decided they wanted it all or would die trying

You are just eager to elevate this baseless opinion piece to the truth. In reality, it is Israel that rejects a two state solution and want it all. We see you guys screaming there is already a Palestine, Jordan while Israel builds more settlements.

It is not an opinion piece it is the truth based on evidence freely available and often posted on this board. The LoN partitioned palestine giving 78% to the arab muslims. They demanded it all and threatened violence if they did not get it, which they made good on. You are correct in your assumption that there is already a " palestine" and the "palestinians" tried to take control by force. The King of Jordan ordered punitive punishments that resulted in as many as 50,000 refugees being killed, then cut them adrift with no support.

You have never produced a valid link to Israel denying a two state solution, while there are tens of thousands of valid links to the arab muslims refusing a two state solution

There is massive evidence. When Israel demanded to be recognized in order to start two-states talk, Hamas recognized Israel. The Israel started the 2006 war in order to not to have two-state talks. Quite simple.

LINKS ? as this is only found on the hate sites and is not supported by any evidence.

What war did Israel start in 2006 then, as the arab muslims were firing illegal weapons instead of talking peace as they agreed in 1999

 

[Phoenall]

By citizen of palestine the LoN meant citizen of the mandate of palestine

Link?

Read the mandate of palestine and the order in council, they have both been supplied quite a lot of times

I have and they do not say what you think. And you always duck out when I ask you to quote the passage.

Here you go, once again I am proving that you are a liar



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Article 21: Definitions

For the purpose of this Order:

1. The expression “Palestine” includes the territories to which the mandate for Palestine applies, except such parts of the territories comprised in Palestine to the east of Jordan and the Dead Sea as were defined by Order of the High Commissioner dated the first of September 1922.





LOSER

 

[P F Tinmore]

By citizen of palestine the LoN meant citizen of the mandate of palestine

Link?

Read the mandate of palestine and the order in council, they have both been supplied quite a lot of times

I have and they do not say what you think. And you always duck out when I ask you to quote the passage.

Here you go, once again I am proving that you are a liar



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Article 21: Definitions

For the purpose of this Order:

1. The expression “Palestine” includes the territories to which the mandate for Palestine applies, except such parts of the territories comprised in Palestine to the east of Jordan and the Dead Sea as were defined by Order of the High Commissioner dated the first of September 1922.





LOSER

It was the Palestine Mandate.

Of course it would be in Palestine.

 

[Challenger]

By citizen of palestine the LoN meant citizen of the mandate of palestine

Link?

Read the mandate of palestine and the order in council, they have both been supplied quite a lot of times

I have and they do not say what you think. And you always duck out when I ask you to quote the passage.

Here you go, once again I am proving that you are a liar



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Article 21: Definitions

For the purpose of this Order:

1. The expression “Palestine” includes the territories to which the mandate for Palestine applies, except such parts of the territories comprised in Palestine to the east of Jordan and the Dead Sea as were defined by Order of the High Commissioner dated the first of September 1922.





LOSER

It was the Palestine Mandate.

Of course it would be in Palestine.

PF, you really should put that Phuckwit on ignore; he never posts anything worth responding to or taking seriously...unless of course you enjoy pulling his chain...in which case, enjoy yourself!

 

[Challenger]

And here again, is an example of trying to play the victim.

Correct! Poor Zionist Israel, no matter what we do, our collective intellect has found it impossible to come up with a solution to the problem that we colonised another people's lands, slaughtered and drove them out, and now they're angry with us, boo hoo. Maybe we should have accepted the peace offer from Syria after 1948? You know, the one that offered to absorb the Palestinian refugees in exchange for bits of territory we'd conquered. Nah, Zionists bleat about peace to the gullible west while continuing to steal Palestinian land...oh, here's a good one; lets accuse the Palestinians of trying to ethnically cleanse our "settlers" from their state...

Another rambling response from RoccoR that avoids the problem and distorts history in pursuit of his agenda. Wonder how the "West" would have fared had Ogedei lived another few years?

 

[Hollie]

By citizen of palestine the LoN meant citizen of the mandate of palestine

Link?

Read the mandate of palestine and the order in council, they have both been supplied quite a lot of times

I have and they do not say what you think. And you always duck out when I ask you to quote the passage.

Here you go, once again I am proving that you are a liar



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Article 21: Definitions

For the purpose of this Order:

1. The expression “Palestine” includes the territories to which the mandate for Palestine applies, except such parts of the territories comprised in Palestine to the east of Jordan and the Dead Sea as were defined by Order of the High Commissioner dated the first of September 1922.





LOSER

It was the Palestine Mandate.

Of course it would be in Palestine.

In the geographic region called Pal'istan. Not your invented, mythical "country of Disney.... I mean 'Pal'istan"

 

[Hollie]

And here again, is an example of trying to play the victim.

Correct! Poor Zionist Israel, no matter what we do, our collective intellect has found it impossible to come up with a solution to the problem that we colonised another people's lands, slaughtered and drove them out, and now they're angry with us, boo hoo. Maybe we should have accepted the peace offer from Syria after 1948? You know, the one that offered to absorb the Palestinian refugees in exchange for bits of territory we'd conquered. Nah, Zionists bleat about peace to the gullible west while continuing to steal Palestinian land...oh, here's a good one; lets accuse the Palestinians of trying to ethnically cleanse our "settlers" from their state...

Another rambling response from RoccoR that avoids the problem and distorts history in pursuit of his agenda. Wonder how the "West" would have fared had Ogedei lived another few years?

Yet another feverish, saliva-slinging tirade. It's always worth a chuckle when the knuckleheads launch into the "stolen lands™ canards without understanding that the absentee land owners who controlled large tracts of land sold large portions of the property to The Zionist Entity™

Still, I do miss the high pitch screeching about The Genocide of the Poor, Oppressed Pal'istanians™.

 

[montelatici]

And here again, is an example of trying to play the victim.

Correct! Poor Zionist Israel, no matter what we do, our collective intellect has found it impossible to come up with a solution to the problem that we colonised another people's lands, slaughtered and drove them out, and now they're angry with us, boo hoo. Maybe we should have accepted the peace offer from Syria after 1948? You know, the one that offered to absorb the Palestinian refugees in exchange for bits of territory we'd conquered. Nah, Zionists bleat about peace to the gullible west while continuing to steal Palestinian land...oh, here's a good one; lets accuse the Palestinians of trying to ethnically cleanse our "settlers" from their state...

Another rambling response from RoccoR that avoids the problem and distorts history in pursuit of his agenda. Wonder how the "West" would have fared had Ogedei lived another few years?

Yet another feverish, saliva-slinging tirade. It's always worth a chuckle when the knuckleheads launch into the "stolen lands™ canards without understanding that the absentee land owners who controlled large tracts of land sold large portions of the property to The Zionist Entity™

Still, I do miss the high pitch screeching about The Genocide of the Poor, Oppressed Pal'istanians™.

The Zionists managed to buy less than 7% of the land by 1947, the rest was owned by Palestinian Muslims and Christians in 1947, as the UN commissioned, "Survey of Palestine" stated. You keep barking propaganda through your snout, no one believes it.

 

[Phoenall]

By citizen of palestine the LoN meant citizen of the mandate of palestine

Link?

Read the mandate of palestine and the order in council, they have both been supplied quite a lot of times

I have and they do not say what you think. And you always duck out when I ask you to quote the passage.

Here you go, once again I am proving that you are a liar



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Article 21: Definitions

For the purpose of this Order:

1. The expression “Palestine” includes the territories to which the mandate for Palestine applies, except such parts of the territories comprised in Palestine to the east of Jordan and the Dead Sea as were defined by Order of the High Commissioner dated the first of September 1922.





LOSER

It was the Palestine Mandate.

Of course it would be in Palestine.

So you admit that you were wrong again

 

[Phoenall]

And here again, is an example of trying to play the victim.

Correct! Poor Zionist Israel, no matter what we do, our collective intellect has found it impossible to come up with a solution to the problem that we colonised another people's lands, slaughtered and drove them out, and now they're angry with us, boo hoo. Maybe we should have accepted the peace offer from Syria after 1948? You know, the one that offered to absorb the Palestinian refugees in exchange for bits of territory we'd conquered. Nah, Zionists bleat about peace to the gullible west while continuing to steal Palestinian land...oh, here's a good one; lets accuse the Palestinians of trying to ethnically cleanse our "settlers" from their state...

Another rambling response from RoccoR that avoids the problem and distorts history in pursuit of his agenda. Wonder how the "West" would have fared had Ogedei lived another few years?

Yet another feverish, saliva-slinging tirade. It's always worth a chuckle when the knuckleheads launch into the "stolen lands™ canards without understanding that the absentee land owners who controlled large tracts of land sold large portions of the property to The Zionist Entity™

Still, I do miss the high pitch screeching about The Genocide of the Poor, Oppressed Pal'istanians™.

The Zionists managed to buy less than 7% of the land by 1947, the rest was owned by Palestinian Muslims and Christians in 1947, as the UN commissioned, "Survey of Palestine" stated. You keep barking propaganda through your snout, no one believes it.

WRONG it was owned by absentee Ottoman landlords

And nice of you to present the arab muslim name for the land FILASTIN

 

[MJB12741]

And here again, is an example of trying to play the victim.

Correct! Poor Zionist Israel, no matter what we do, our collective intellect has found it impossible to come up with a solution to the problem that we colonised another people's lands, slaughtered and drove them out, and now they're angry with us, boo hoo. Maybe we should have accepted the peace offer from Syria after 1948? You know, the one that offered to absorb the Palestinian refugees in exchange for bits of territory we'd conquered. Nah, Zionists bleat about peace to the gullible west while continuing to steal Palestinian land...oh, here's a good one; lets accuse the Palestinians of trying to ethnically cleanse our "settlers" from their state...

Another rambling response from RoccoR that avoids the problem and distorts history in pursuit of his agenda. Wonder how the "West" would have fared had Ogedei lived another few years?

Yet another feverish, saliva-slinging tirade. It's always worth a chuckle when the knuckleheads launch into the "stolen lands™ canards without understanding that the absentee land owners who controlled large tracts of land sold large portions of the property to The Zionist Entity™

Still, I do miss the high pitch screeching about The Genocide of the Poor, Oppressed Pal'istanians™.

The Zionists managed to buy less than 7% of the land by 1947, the rest was owned by Palestinian Muslims and Christians in 1947, as the UN commissioned, "Survey of Palestine" stated. You keep barking propaganda through your snout, no one believes it.

Now this is an official documentation of "the Zionist crocodile to Palestinian Arabs." Must be that Muslim archbishop who Monte got it from.

 

[montelatici]

It's from 1936, printed in a Palestinian newspaper while you people say the Palestinians did not exist. LOL

 

[Hollie]

It's from 1936, printed in a Palestinian newspaper while you people say the Palestinians did not exist. LOL

You have convinced yourself that a mythical "country of Pal'istan" once existed. That's fine sweetie. Just don't expect others to share your delusions. LOL.

There is something called the "Bible Belt Newspaper"
This Bible Belt paper just discovered some interesting folks -- they're called 'evangelicals'


It must be published in the "country of the Bible Belt". LOL

 

[RoccoR]

montelatici, et al,

You do not listen very well. One more time.

It's from 1936, printed in a Palestinian newspaper while you people say the Palestinians did not exist. LOL

(COMMENT)

In the 1936, the place called "Palestine" referred to the territory to which the Mandate for Palestine applied. You will find this in Paragraph 1 Part I, Palestine Order In Council.

You have to remember, Palestine was within such boundaries as may be fixed by the Allied Powers; NOT by the Arabs of the territory. You will find this in the San Remo Convention and the Mandate for Palestine.

Don't confuse the "Palestine" that you try to imply as some sort of self-governing institution or special entity, country or state, under the sovereignty of the Arab Palestinians. It certainly is not. It is a territorial name.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[montelatici]

montelatici, et al,

You do not listen very well. One more time.

It's from 1936, printed in a Palestinian newspaper while you people say the Palestinians did not exist. LOL

(COMMENT)

In the 1936, the place called "Palestine" referred to the territory to which the Mandate for Palestine applied. You will find this in Paragraph 1 Part I, Palestine Order In Council.

You have to remember, Palestine was within such boundaries as may be fixed by the Allied Powers; NOT by the Arabs of the territory. You will find this in the San Remo Convention and the Mandate for Palestine.

Don't confuse the "Palestine" that you try to imply as some sort of self-governing institution or special entity, country or state, under the sovereignty of the Arab Palestinians. It certainly is not. It is a territorial name.

Most Respectfully,
R

You don't understand very well. And, I don't listen to morons. The Palestinians considered themselves Palestinians even though the British refused to allow them exercise self-government, because they (the British) were intent on flooding the land with enough European Jews to be able to subjugate and expropriate the native Palestinian Muslims and Christians.

Just as Kurds consider themselves Kurds, who have never had a state under the sovereignty of Kurds.

 

[Hollie]

montelatici, et al,

You do not listen very well. One more time.

It's from 1936, printed in a Palestinian newspaper while you people say the Palestinians did not exist. LOL

(COMMENT)

In the 1936, the place called "Palestine" referred to the territory to which the Mandate for Palestine applied. You will find this in Paragraph 1 Part I, Palestine Order In Council.

You have to remember, Palestine was within such boundaries as may be fixed by the Allied Powers; NOT by the Arabs of the territory. You will find this in the San Remo Convention and the Mandate for Palestine.

Don't confuse the "Palestine" that you try to imply as some sort of self-governing institution or special entity, country or state, under the sovereignty of the Arab Palestinians. It certainly is not. It is a territorial name.

Most Respectfully,
R

You don't understand very well. And, I don't listen to morons. The Palestinians considered themselves Palestinians even though the British refused to allow them exercise self-government, because they (the British) were intent on flooding the land with enough European Jews to be able to subjugate and expropriate the native Palestinian Muslims and Christians.

Just as Kurds consider themselves Kurds, who have never had a state under the sovereignty of Kurds.

Monty's "country of Disney'istan". It's getting repetitious. Your really odd notions of history and your need to invent entire nations and nationalities which never existed is a hoot.

Can I suggest a subscription to the Bible Belt News? You might be interested to keep abreast of the National and international events affecting the "country of the Bible Belt".

 

[montelatici]

Why do you address me, instead of the facts? I don't understand what you think you gain by ignoring the facts and addressing the poster the presents the facts to you. I don't mind, it seems you are attracted to me as you respond to every fact I present. Don't you have a significant other you can flirt with. I just don't like you, so quit flirting.

 

[Shusha]

Just as Kurds consider themselves Kurds, who have never had a state under the sovereignty of Kurds.

I would agree that this is an accurate analogy. The Kurds are Kurds, but have never had sovereignty of territory. The Arab Palestinians are Palestinians but have never had sovereignty of territory.

 

[montelatici]

But European Zionists never had sovereignty either, until Partition. At least in pre-history the native Muslim and Christian Palestinians could claim that their ancestors had sovereignty of Canaan, Judea, Samara, Philistia etc.