RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Just another Anti-Israeli Human Rights Report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
WOW!
Be careful what you wish for in the drama...
.
Like I've said before, I can give you a citation (Binding or Law) for every fact I argue. Whereas you make these comments with nothing in support and, like many of the anti-Israeli and pro-Palestinians, expect it to hold some credibility.
There is really no such thing as a forfeiture rule unless it is specifically cited by law.
While I agree that the Arab Palestinians have the entire complement of rights, including the right to self-determination, the Israelis are NOT required to surrender any territory to the Arab Palestinian.
AND! Just like in mathematics, there are cases of BAD Notation, in international politics, there is much the same thing... Calling the West Bank and Jerusalem "Occupied Palestinian Territory is technically wrong. IN 1988, the West Bank and Jerusalem were Jordanian Territories Under Israeli Occupation. And those territories today are more properly defined as "former" Jordanian Territories Under Israeli Occupation.
Up and until December 2012, nearly a quarter century later, and well after claims made by the Hostile Arab Palestinians, the status of the "former" Jordanian Territories Under Israeli Occupation was noted to be this by the UN Legal Affairs Office.
• Excerpts from the Memorandum •
There are two, very interesting sentences that you should be able to address:
Most Respectfully,
R
SUBTOPIC: Just another Anti-Israeli Human Rights Report
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
WOW!
Be careful what you wish for in the drama...
and intentionally avoided mentioning that Article 68
(COMMENT)Israel has forfeited those rights by violating virtually all of the rules of occupation.
.
Like I've said before, I can give you a citation (Binding or Law) for every fact I argue. Whereas you make these comments with nothing in support and, like many of the anti-Israeli and pro-Palestinians, expect it to hold some credibility.
There is really no such thing as a forfeiture rule unless it is specifically cited by law.
While I agree that the Arab Palestinians have the entire complement of rights, including the right to self-determination, the Israelis are NOT required to surrender any territory to the Arab Palestinian.
AND! Just like in mathematics, there are cases of BAD Notation, in international politics, there is much the same thing... Calling the West Bank and Jerusalem "Occupied Palestinian Territory is technically wrong. IN 1988, the West Bank and Jerusalem were Jordanian Territories Under Israeli Occupation. And those territories today are more properly defined as "former" Jordanian Territories Under Israeli Occupation.
Up and until December 2012, nearly a quarter century later, and well after claims made by the Hostile Arab Palestinians, the status of the "former" Jordanian Territories Under Israeli Occupation was noted to be this by the UN Legal Affairs Office.
• Excerpts from the Memorandum •
There are two, very interesting sentences that you should be able to address:
- "Palestine was not identified as a State or Country"
- "nor could its authorities be identified as a government"
Most Respectfully,
R