RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Liberation
⁜→ P F Tinmore, rylah, et al,
BLUF: Any Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) can fight a "war of liberation." Any HoAP can copy the words and phrases from other conflicts and twist them to fit the situation in Palestine. But in the theft of the terminology, do they understand what message they convey?
.
With so many controversies in the Middle East and North African (MENA) Region, there are multiple facets in addressing the issues. The two most common aspects are the legal/quasi-legal Rule of Law (RoL) and then the Political/Military (POLMIL) approach which is on a foundation that is fraught with outcomes having mand hidden agendas and latent but existing → yet not fully developed or manifest → as a platform and where the complete truth is never really told.
Our friend "rylah" scored a bulls-eye when he uncovered the serious question on the issue of liberation. Since the creation of Committee 24 (C-24)(the Special Committee on Decolonization), nothing in the immediate proximity of the Arab -Israeli Conflict was ever considered "non-Self-Governing (the Non-Self-Governing Territories are defined as "territories whose people have not yet attained a full measure of self-government").
The disputed territories have, at one time or another, been subject to self-governing institutions. It is just that the Arab Palestinian people lost control of it in favor of the various terrorist groups.
Most Respectfully,
R
SUBTOPIC: Liberation
⁜→ P F Tinmore, rylah, et al,
BLUF: Any Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) can fight a "war of liberation." Any HoAP can copy the words and phrases from other conflicts and twist them to fit the situation in Palestine. But in the theft of the terminology, do they understand what message they convey?
Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law said:national liberation movements Movements of liberation attempting to seize control of particular territory have, strictly, no inherent status in international law. However, they may be, and have been, accorded aspects of status. Thus, it is said that there has evolved in practice recognition of liberation movements other than recognition of them as a government. Indeed, it has been said that ‘[w]ith the development of the law relating to non-self-governing territories and the principle of self-determination, some … national liberation movements … may be in the process of acquiring the status of a subject of international Law.
SOURCE: Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law / John P. Grant and J. Craig Barker. -- 3rd ed. Copyright 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016. pp401
Dictionary of Politics said:Various groups were created to try, in their different ways, either through political negotiation or through terrorist tactics, to find a solution. The two most important were the Fatah organization (the Palestine National Liberation Movement), founded in 1957, and the PLO itself, founded in 1964. Fatah, as a militant terrorist organization, insisted on violent means, especially through trying to make alliances with the left-wing Muslim co-religionists in Lebanon against the richer urban Christians.
SOURCE: Routledge Dictionary of Politics 3 ed. by David Robertson, © 2004 Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001. pp 376
Indeed, it is a national liberation struggle.
(COMMENT)How do you liberate something that was never independent?
.
With so many controversies in the Middle East and North African (MENA) Region, there are multiple facets in addressing the issues. The two most common aspects are the legal/quasi-legal Rule of Law (RoL) and then the Political/Military (POLMIL) approach which is on a foundation that is fraught with outcomes having mand hidden agendas and latent but existing → yet not fully developed or manifest → as a platform and where the complete truth is never really told.
Our friend "rylah" scored a bulls-eye when he uncovered the serious question on the issue of liberation. Since the creation of Committee 24 (C-24)(the Special Committee on Decolonization), nothing in the immediate proximity of the Arab -Israeli Conflict was ever considered "non-Self-Governing (the Non-Self-Governing Territories are defined as "territories whose people have not yet attained a full measure of self-government").
The disputed territories have, at one time or another, been subject to self-governing institutions. It is just that the Arab Palestinian people lost control of it in favor of the various terrorist groups.
Most Respectfully,
R