Palestinian aggression continues: Israeli child BURNED ALIVE in Samaria

[toastman]

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Now quote the part of resolution 181 where it said land would be "transferred" to the Jews ?

Oh, and again, I already proved to you that Resolution 181 was used by the Palestinians to declare independence.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Now quote the part of resolution 181 where it said land would be "transferred" to the Jews ?

Oh, and again, I already proved to you that Resolution 181 was used by the Palestinians to declare independence.

Deep thinking is not your forte, is it. The plan was to divide Palestine into two states. Land would have to be transferred to the state that was not Palestine.

You don't need a PhD.

Again, land transfer is a completely different issue.
Also, you ducked my question again.

 

[Billo_Really]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty.

It sure the hell does!

Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

Better than you do. And I'm not some kiss-ass *****, either.

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides.

Holding onto land seized in a war, was illegal.

The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan.

You cannot say people living on land for the last 2000 years, was not their land.

If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land.

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Conquer by conquest was outlawed since the end of WWII.

 

[toastman]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty.

It sure the hell does!

Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

Better than you do. And I'm not some kiss-ass *****, either.

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides.

Holding onto land seized in a war, was illegal.

The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan.

You cannot say people living on land for the last 2000 years, was not their land.

If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land.

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Conquer by conquest was outlawed since the end of WWII.

"Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land"

Wow, you're beyond stupid. The land I'm talking about is part of Israel. It's in the green line. Show me where it says that the land we are talking about is not recognized , you deluded Palestinian ass kisser.

Oh, and here you go:

This should get the taste of Palestinian ass from you mouth

 

[pbel]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty.

It sure the hell does!

Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

Better than you do. And I'm not some kiss-ass *****, either.

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides.

Holding onto land seized in a war, was illegal.

The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan.

You cannot say people living on land for the last 2000 years, was not their land.

If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land.

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Conquer by conquest was outlawed since the end of WWII.

"Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land"

Wow, you're beyond stupid. The land I'm talking about is part of Israel. It's in the green line. Show me where it says that the land we are talking about is not recognized , you deluded Palestinian ass kisser.

Oh, and here you go:

This should get the taste of Palestinian ass from you mouth

We all know that Israel is the Mighty Mouse of the ME and can easily defend its borders, but what's important is that Israel's enemies do not recognize the Jewish State and see it as simple Imperialist Colonial yoke of the Western Powers who created her in the UN as a political fiat.

That why radical Islam and the Arab Spring were born as a reaction of Western Colonialism of which Israel is a part...

With hundreds of millions of people surrounding an unwanted state created by the west the conclusion for the future is self-evident...

 

[P F Tinmore]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty.

It sure the hell does!

Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

Better than you do. And I'm not some kiss-ass *****, either.

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides.

Holding onto land seized in a war, was illegal.

The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan.

You cannot say people living on land for the last 2000 years, was not their land.

If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land.

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Conquer by conquest was outlawed since the end of WWII.

"Like I told you *****, they don't recognize Israel's right to that land"

Wow, you're beyond stupid. The land I'm talking about is part of Israel. It's in the green line. Show me where it says that the land we are talking about is not recognized , you deluded Palestinian ass kisser.

Oh, and here you go:

This should get the taste of Palestinian ass from you mouth

The green line is specifically not to be a political or territorial border.

It doesn't mean shit.

 

[theliq]

A young Israeli girl and her father were wounded Thursday after the car in which they were traveling in the West Bank was hit by a firebomb.

The girl is in serious condition after suffering massive third degree burns after flames engulfed the car, which was traveling near the settlement of El Matan in the Shomron. The father, 40, was also wounded, suffering from light burn injuries; both were taken to a hospital in central Israel.

At around 6:30 pm IDF forces, MDA paramedics, firefighters and the police received a call about a burning car, which the report said was hit by a Molotov cocktail thrown by Palestinians.

The arriving forces discovered a young girl with third degree burns to over 50% of her body, mostly to her face and upper torso.

Young girl seriously wounded by firebomb in West Bank terror attack - Israel News Ynetnews

Terrible that this is....but you forgot to mention this is typical Israeli modus-operandi........You are such an Arse Hole

 

[theliq]

Name of the child: Ayala (daughter of Ruth) Shapira

Terrible Shame.......but it is the Israelis/Jews that burn alive innocent children TO DEATH...Arse Hole

 

[Phoenall]

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

NOPE it did nothing of the sort, what it did was to illegally transfer Jewish land to arab muslims contrary to INTERNATIONAL LAW as set down in the Mandate for Palestine. The land had already been apportioned to the arab muslims leaving the rest for the Jews. 181 had no authority to split the land and split it as it did, and the UN knows this which is why it later amended the UN charter to give Israel greater rights to the land of palestine.

Could you prove what you said?

Treaty after Treaty signed by the LoN in the years after the end of WW1. I have shown the maps of resulting from those treaties that very clearly say the land was for THE RESURECTED NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS. These entered into CUSTOMNARY INTERNATIONAL LAW at the time and still stand to this day. Try reading the treaties in full and see what they say about the arab muslims claims to palestine. Then see what they say about who the land was given too and why.

 

[Phoenall]

Aww poor Nazi Joe, did I get under your skin by exposing your leis again ?

But thanks for once again showing us how you favor genocide

Meh, when you put yourself in the position to be slaughtered, it's more like mass suicide.

They were told that the Arabs would kill them if they stayed. Eventually they will.

Very doubtful if the arab world wants to survive for longer than 30 seconds afterward, as that is the time it would take for the first ICBM to hit mecca. Closely followed by ones targetting the other ISLAMONAZI cities that had taken up arms illegally against Israel.
Read the UN charter and what it says about "all out war"

 

[Phoenall]

So all the land and property that the arab muslims had stolen from the Jews over the last 1400 years means nothing ?

Nope. 1400 years ago, there were no Jews living in Palestine. The Romans had chased most of them out. The arabs invited some of them to come back.

There has been Jews in palestine for the last 4500 years uninterupted, the arab muslims can barely muster 50 years of control until 1875 when they migrated illegally on the promise of work. It was the Ottomans that invited the European Jews to come back and join forces with their fellow Jews who lived in palestine and work the land.

 

[Phoenall]

So all the land and property that the arab muslims had stolen from the Jews over the last 1400 years means nothing ?

Nope. 1400 years ago, there were no Jews living in Palestine. The Romans had chased most of them out. The arabs invited some of them to come back.

Doesn't compute.

Only because you're kind of stupid. Here's the reality. Up until World War II, it was probably a better deal to be a Jew in the Muslim World than in the Christian World, with it's holocausts and pogroms and inquisitions and the occasional bought of "Hey, we've got a plague, the Jews must be poisoning the wells!"

The Europe got the neat idea to just dump all their Jews into Palestine, and the Arabs were all like, "Hey, wait a minute!"

BULLSHIT

 

[P F Tinmore]

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

NOPE it did nothing of the sort, what it did was to illegally transfer Jewish land to arab muslims contrary to INTERNATIONAL LAW as set down in the Mandate for Palestine. The land had already been apportioned to the arab muslims leaving the rest for the Jews. 181 had no authority to split the land and split it as it did, and the UN knows this which is why it later amended the UN charter to give Israel greater rights to the land of palestine.

Could you prove what you said?

Treaty after Treaty signed by the LoN in the years after the end of WW1. I have shown the maps of resulting from those treaties that very clearly say the land was for THE RESURECTED NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS. These entered into CUSTOMNARY INTERNATIONAL LAW at the time and still stand to this day. Try reading the treaties in full and see what they say about the arab muslims claims to palestine. Then see what they say about who the land was given too and why.

Could you show where in those documents that land was given to Israel or a Jewish state for their exclusive use?

 

[JoeB131]

Excellent Nazi mentality Joe!

Now go cry yourself to sleep because Israel exists and you cannot handle it.

BTW, we' e been hearing threats like yours for the last 7 decades, and none of them have come true. You and your Nazi ilk will be driven to hell (hopefully soon) before anything happens to Israel.

Yeah, Toasty, but you got a problem. More people are trying to get out of the Zionist Entity than are trying to get in. and the problem WILL only get worse with time.

Meanwhile, the Palestinians are reproducing faster than you are.

 

[JoeB131]

Very doubtful if the arab world wants to survive for longer than 30 seconds afterward, as that is the time it would take for the first ICBM to hit mecca. Closely followed by ones targetting the other ISLAMONAZI cities that had taken up arms illegally against Israel.
Read the UN charter and what it says about "all out war"

Yup, that's it. the Zionists are going to threaten the whole world if they don't get their way.

And you wonder why people hate you.

 

[Phoenall]

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

NOPE it did nothing of the sort, what it did was to illegally transfer Jewish land to arab muslims contrary to INTERNATIONAL LAW as set down in the Mandate for Palestine. The land had already been apportioned to the arab muslims leaving the rest for the Jews. 181 had no authority to split the land and split it as it did, and the UN knows this which is why it later amended the UN charter to give Israel greater rights to the land of palestine.

Could you prove what you said?

Treaty after Treaty signed by the LoN in the years after the end of WW1. I have shown the maps of resulting from those treaties that very clearly say the land was for THE RESURECTED NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS. These entered into CUSTOMNARY INTERNATIONAL LAW at the time and still stand to this day. Try reading the treaties in full and see what they say about the arab muslims claims to palestine. Then see what they say about who the land was given too and why.

Could you show where in those documents that land was given to Israel or a Jewish state for their exclusive use?

Map from the treaty in 1920

Map from the treaty in 1921

And I never said that the land was given to the Jews for their exclusive use, just that the land was given as the RESURECTED HOMELAND OF THE JEWS. The other inhabitants would be given the choice of staying as full citizens or relocating to a country of their choice .

 

[Phoenall]

Excellent Nazi mentality Joe!

Now go cry yourself to sleep because Israel exists and you cannot handle it.

BTW, we' e been hearing threats like yours for the last 7 decades, and none of them have come true. You and your Nazi ilk will be driven to hell (hopefully soon) before anything happens to Israel.

Yeah, Toasty, but you got a problem. More people are trying to get out of the Zionist Entity than are trying to get in. and the problem WILL only get worse with time.

Meanwhile, the Palestinians are reproducing faster than you are.

And they will still bo on the outside looking in, and seeing the far greater firepower that opposes them. They have tried and failed 6 times to date in gaining control of Israel, without a suicide wish they have no chance of ever winning.

 

[toastman]

Excellent Nazi mentality Joe!

Now go cry yourself to sleep because Israel exists and you cannot handle it.

BTW, we' e been hearing threats like yours for the last 7 decades, and none of them have come true. You and your Nazi ilk will be driven to hell (hopefully soon) before anything happens to Israel.

Yeah, Toasty, but you got a problem. More people are trying to get out of the Zionist Entity than are trying to get in. and the problem WILL only get worse with time.

Meanwhile, the Palestinians are reproducing faster than you are.

Can you prove that Joe ?

 

[Phoenall]

Very doubtful if the arab world wants to survive for longer than 30 seconds afterward, as that is the time it would take for the first ICBM to hit mecca. Closely followed by ones targetting the other ISLAMONAZI cities that had taken up arms illegally against Israel.
Read the UN charter and what it says about "all out war"

Yup, that's it. the Zionists are going to threaten the whole world if they don't get their way.

And you wonder why people hate you.

The zionists will treaten no one, but the people of the free world will turn on islam and we will see many muslim deaths and deportaions if nuclear weapons are used against Israel. Then the free world will target the islamic world with non nuclear weapons and not a zionist in sight. How much support do you think you will have if one nuke is unleashed on Israel ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

NOPE it did nothing of the sort, what it did was to illegally transfer Jewish land to arab muslims contrary to INTERNATIONAL LAW as set down in the Mandate for Palestine. The land had already been apportioned to the arab muslims leaving the rest for the Jews. 181 had no authority to split the land and split it as it did, and the UN knows this which is why it later amended the UN charter to give Israel greater rights to the land of palestine.

Could you prove what you said?

Treaty after Treaty signed by the LoN in the years after the end of WW1. I have shown the maps of resulting from those treaties that very clearly say the land was for THE RESURECTED NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS. These entered into CUSTOMNARY INTERNATIONAL LAW at the time and still stand to this day. Try reading the treaties in full and see what they say about the arab muslims claims to palestine. Then see what they say about who the land was given too and why.

Could you show where in those documents that land was given to Israel or a Jewish state for their exclusive use?

Map from the treaty in 1920

Map from the treaty in 1921

And I never said that the land was given to the Jews for their exclusive use, just that the land was given as the RESURECTED HOMELAND OF THE JEWS. The other inhabitants would be given the choice of staying as full citizens or relocating to a country of their choice .

Full citizens of what?

 

[teddyearp]

You are such an Arse Hole

And you're not? NO. You're not. You're a cull.