Palestinian aggression continues: Israeli child BURNED ALIVE in Samaria

[JoeB131]

You need to re read my post . owning land and having sovereignty over that land are two different things. The Palestinians could have declared independence over that land BEFORE Israel did. But instead, after Israel declared independence, here come the Palestinians claiming it was there country.

You're just another brainwashed moron Joe. There's no hope for you.

Actually, there was an attempt to partition the country the Palestinians didn't agree to.

Sorry, the Zionists are a bunch of theives. It will be a great day when they are pushed into the sea.

 

[toastman]

You need to re read my post . owning land and having sovereignty over that land are two different things. The Palestinians could have declared independence over that land BEFORE Israel did. But instead, after Israel declared independence, here come the Palestinians claiming it was there country.

You're just another brainwashed moron Joe. There's no hope for you.

Actually, there was an attempt to partition the country the Palestinians didn't agree to.

Sorry, the Zionists are a bunch of theives. It will be a great day when they are pushed into the sea.

Aww poor Nazi Joe, did I get under your skin by exposing your leis again ?

But thanks for once again showing us how you favor genocide

 

[Hossfly]

You need to re read my post . owning land and having sovereignty over that land are two different things. The Palestinians could have declared independence over that land BEFORE Israel did. But instead, after Israel declared independence, here come the Palestinians claiming it was there country.

You're just another brainwashed moron Joe. There's no hope for you.

Actually, there was an attempt to partition the country the Palestinians didn't agree to.

Sorry, the Zionists are a bunch of theives. It will be a great day when they are pushed into the sea.

Aww poor Nazi Joe, did I get under your skin by exposing your leis again ?

But thanks for once again showing us how you favor genocide

NASA is talking about colonizing Mars. On the day the Israelis land their contingent on Mars, a herd of Palestinians will come along and say the Jews are stealing their land..........again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Still spreading the same lie I see? The Palestinians used the partition plan in 1988 to declare independence too, the SAME way Israel did so in 1948. We've been through this 100 times , yet you keep bringing up the same lies Tinmore.
Once again, you are wrong. 're wrong about everything.

You cannot make your own rules and history to further your agenda. 'Tinmore' pre requisites for declaring independence do not apply to real life.

So, Palestine's international borders are those proposed by resolution 181?

Palestine has no international borders.

Look up international boundaries in the legend then find them on the map.

The solid lines are proposed borders.

Example:

1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement March 23 1949​

Correct and in both cases they are the international borders of the MANDATE FOR PALESTINE, and as the treaty stated " hereinafter referred to as palestine" IT WAS NEVER A COUNTRY until 1988.

The armistice agreements were almost a year after the mandate left Palestine and Palestine and its international borders were still there.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And then as the British were moving out, Zionist terrorist groups went in and took Palestinian land that wasn't allocated to them in the Partition Plan. Here's what was initially allocated to Israel.



Here's what the UN says happened after...

So yes, they did steal the land.

Not according to UN Resolution 3236!

Whacha gotta say to that, scumbag?

It's not recognized by anyone. Not one country on the planet recognizes Israel's right to that land.

International law, is not propaganda.

Why don't you stop spreading Israeli propaganda, since IHL isn't on your side?

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty. Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides. The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan. If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

 

[Hossfly]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty. Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides. The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan. If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Who lives there now, Tinbone?

 

[Phoenall]

You could if I had no legal right to be in that house, and had stolen it from a black family who owned it 30 years ago.

Well, no, actually, I couldn't. at worst, I could maybe force you to pay them damages.

But here's the thing. If the European Jews had demanded land from Germany, they might have a valid case. The Germans did wrong them.

The Palestinians just had the bad luck of being under the boot of the British Empire.

So all the land and property that the arab muslims had stolen from the Jews over the last 1400 years means nothing ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Who lives there now, Tinbone?

Illegal settlers.

 

[Phoenall]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty. Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides. The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan. If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

NOPE it did nothing of the sort, what it did was to illegally transfer Jewish land to arab muslims contrary to INTERNATIONAL LAW as set down in the Mandate for Palestine. The land had already been apportioned to the arab muslims leaving the rest for the Jews. 181 had no authority to split the land and split it as it did, and the UN knows this which is why it later amended the UN charter to give Israel greater rights to the land of palestine.

 

[Phoenall]

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Who lives there now, Tinbone?

Illegal settlers.

YEP them pesky arab muslims will squatt anywhere wont they.

 

[P F Tinmore]

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

NOPE it did nothing of the sort, what it did was to illegally transfer Jewish land to arab muslims contrary to INTERNATIONAL LAW as set down in the Mandate for Palestine. The land had already been apportioned to the arab muslims leaving the rest for the Jews. 181 had no authority to split the land and split it as it did, and the UN knows this which is why it later amended the UN charter to give Israel greater rights to the land of palestine.

Could you prove what you said?

 

[toastman]

Wow, you're dumber than I though. The RIGHT to sovereignty doesn't mean they have sovereignty. Do you not know how to read you demented moron?

And the land that Israel captured happened AFTER 5 Arab states attacked them from all sides. The land was not under Palestinian sovereignty either, it was land ALLOTTED to the Palestinians in the partition plan. If that land was stolen, then why did many countries, and the U.N of all organizations, recognize Israel with that land, and still do?

Territorial
changes Israel keeps area allotted to it byPartition Plan, captures 50% of area allotted to Arab state

1948 Arab Israeli War - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Now quote the part of resolution 181 where it said land would be "transferred" to the Jews ?

Oh, and again, I already proved to you that Resolution 181 was used by the Palestinians to declare independence.

 

[Hossfly]

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Now quote the part of resolution 181 where it said land would be "transferred" to the Jews ?

Oh, and again, I already proved to you that Resolution 181 was used by the Palestinians to declare independence.

C'mon,Toast, Tinmore is in the beginning stages of Oldtimers disease and knows not what he said before. Have pity on the old codger.

 

[JoeB131]

Aww poor Nazi Joe, did I get under your skin by exposing your leis again ?

But thanks for once again showing us how you favor genocide

Meh, when you put yourself in the position to be slaughtered, it's more like mass suicide.

They were told that the Arabs would kill them if they stayed. Eventually they will.

 

[JoeB131]

So all the land and property that the arab muslims had stolen from the Jews over the last 1400 years means nothing ?

Nope. 1400 years ago, there were no Jews living in Palestine. The Romans had chased most of them out. The arabs invited some of them to come back.

 

[Hossfly]

So all the land and property that the arab muslims had stolen from the Jews over the last 1400 years means nothing ?

Nope. 1400 years ago, there were no Jews living in Palestine. The Romans had chased most of them out. The arabs invited some of them to come back.

Doesn't compute.

 

[JoeB131]

So all the land and property that the arab muslims had stolen from the Jews over the last 1400 years means nothing ?

Nope. 1400 years ago, there were no Jews living in Palestine. The Romans had chased most of them out. The arabs invited some of them to come back.

Doesn't compute.

Only because you're kind of stupid. Here's the reality. Up until World War II, it was probably a better deal to be a Jew in the Muslim World than in the Christian World, with it's holocausts and pogroms and inquisitions and the occasional bought of "Hey, we've got a plague, the Jews must be poisoning the wells!"

The Europe got the neat idea to just dump all their Jews into Palestine, and the Arabs were all like, "Hey, wait a minute!"

 

[P F Tinmore]

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Now quote the part of resolution 181 where it said land would be "transferred" to the Jews ?

Oh, and again, I already proved to you that Resolution 181 was used by the Palestinians to declare independence.

100% correct.

The partition plan was never implemented so Israel never acquired that land. It is illegal to acquire land through the threat or use of force so Israel can't acquire that land either.

Oh, and again, acquiring land is a real estate issue. It has nothing to do with Israel declaring independence and practicing sovereignty, which the Palestinians did the same way

You are incorrect.

Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war...

The Avalon Project United Nations Security Council Resolution 242​

Again!

Not talking about capturing land during war genius. I'm talking about your comment about how Israel could not acquire land from resolution 181 which is a lie. You're wrong again, Tinmore.

Resolution 181 allotted (set aside) land to be transferred to a Jewish when the resolution was implemented. Resolution 181 was never implemented so that land was never transferred.

Now quote the part of resolution 181 where it said land would be "transferred" to the Jews ?

Oh, and again, I already proved to you that Resolution 181 was used by the Palestinians to declare independence.

Deep thinking is not your forte, is it. The plan was to divide Palestine into two states. Land would have to be transferred to the state that was not Palestine.

You don't need a PhD.

 

[teddyearp]

Well, it looks like the victim has stabilized and may get better:

Critically Wounded Firebomb Victim Stabilizes - Inside Israel - News - Arutz Sheva

 

[toastman]

Aww poor Nazi Joe, did I get under your skin by exposing your leis again ?

But thanks for once again showing us how you favor genocide

Meh, when you put yourself in the position to be slaughtered, it's more like mass suicide.

They were told that the Arabs would kill them if they stayed. Eventually they will.

Excellent Nazi mentality Joe!

Now go cry yourself to sleep because Israel exists and you cannot handle it.

BTW, we' e been hearing threats like yours for the last 7 decades, and none of them have come true. You and your Nazi ilk will be driven to hell (hopefully soon) before anything happens to Israel.