If I showed my family the same kind of love I'd be in jail.
I'll stand by it until I see evidence to the contrary. That is how we differ, you'll stand on your faith and ignore all evidence to the contrary.
Oh my
. I think you just said if you showed the same kind of love as God, then you'd be in jail. That's a quote for an atheist lifetime.
I gave you plenty of hard evidence to the contrary. I don't think you'll believe even when the evidence pops up of humans living with dinosaurs.
Here is what the atheist scientists said about it again for those who missed it --
Dawkins has gone cuckoo, cuckoo as he has further added:
'Wasn’t it faintly depressing for a scientist in the 21st century to find himself arguing the case for evolution? “There’s an aspect of that,” he says. “But I don’t want to put that in a too depressing, negative way. It’s a challenge — a cheerful sort of challenge because it’s so thrilling and exciting.” When he wrote The God Delusion his stated aim was to convert everybody who read it to atheism. With the new book it is to shake some sense into creationists: “I suppose anybody who reads it should no longer be capable of thinking evolution isn’t a fact,” he says, perhaps rather optimistically, I think. “I’d like to think there’s got to be something wrong with people who finish the book and don’t think that.”
I’m afraid he’s destined to be disappointed, as down deep he himself knows. There’s an hilarious transcript in Chapter 7 of a televised conversation he once had with someone called Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women of America (in his Waspy, amusing way he points out that Wright’s “opinion that ‘The morning-after Pill is a paedophile’s best friend’ gives a fair idea of her powers of reasoning”). Anyway, Wright is asking Dawkins to “show me the evidence of the in-between stages from one species to another”, and Dawkins is telling her over and over again to visit any natural history museum and look at the fossils. But Wright is having none of it: “If evolution has had the actual evidence then it would be displayed in museums, not just illustrations,” she says.
It’s hopeless. And Dawkins concedes that, “[Wright] certainly wouldn’t read the book and even if she did read it, it wouldn’t make any difference. Nothing is going to change the mind of somebody who is so doggedly certain ... I think you have to make a real distinction between people who are religious in the sense that your vicar or bishop is religious but accept that evolution as scientific and people like Wendy Wright, who think the world is 6,000 years old, which is flat contradictory to every scrap of evidence we’ve got. That does drive me to despair because nothing’s going to shift those people.” Nevertheless, he’s optimistic that, “many people just don’t know what the facts are. They are simply uneducated. And that’s a fault of us as scientists for not going out there and communicating with them.”'
Richard Dawkins wants to provel that humans did not walk with dinosaurs
news.jornal.us
If Dawkins is dead now, he will be screaming his arse off and
knowing he was wrong.
.
. The word “heaven” is found 276 times in the New Testament alone. I won't describe it for you as the Bible states you will be able to view it from where you end up. Would you like to know how it will be for you? It's in the smileys here to name a few... 
