PA House Introduces a Resolution: The Election Process Shall Be Declared Improper.

[Ray From Cleveland]

No they must not be removed. They do not change the outcome.

Yes they should be removed because they didn't get there by the end of election day. That's what the PA law states.

 

[The Original Tree]

Why are Republican leaders so afraid to validate and confirm the legitimacy of their state election process?
Is it not in the interests of the public, of the integrity of the voting process, and of the Republicans themselves when it is their opponents that are making the fraud (alledgedly) benefit their candidates?

Why wont republicans hear the evidence from the Trump lawyers?

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

****************************************************************

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4th appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:​

​

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.​

​

Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud occurred to change the election results in several states. That Keshavarz-Nia provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, renders him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather opaque to anyone without an enormous amount of training and experience in his field. This requires many of us to take what he says on faith.​

​

Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter Integrity Project (VIP) approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane fashion. His team analyzed publicly available data on absentee ballots and he explained his findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings involved people who changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee using their prior address. In Arizona, which Biden “won” by 10,457 votes, there were 19,997 questionable votes. In Georgia, which Biden “won” by 12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden “won” by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such votes. As Braynard told the Epoch Times:​

​

This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly questionable.… I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state.… I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast absentee ballots back in Georgia.… I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election.​

​

Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the Voter Integrity Project to Monday’s hearing with members of Arizona’s legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted Friday, “The VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA, MI, WI, and AZ, including declarations we collected.” Sunday, another tweet by Braynard revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may indicate illegal ballots. Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/twnship had 781.91% turnout. How does this happen?”​

​

Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120%. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100% turnout.​

Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Election experts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands.

spectator.org

​

​

The voting anamolies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump​

A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump"​

​

According to the data study:​

​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

I'm surprised to find out that I am only 7/10ths of a person, according to Democrat Fraud Machines used in The 6 states that cheated.

Dr Shiva from MIT just proved Vote Swapping Live on TV at The Arizona Hearing.

130% of Democrats voted for Biden vs. -30% voted for Trump.

If you are a Republican, you are only 7/10ths of a person.

Based on the revelation from MIT Scientist Dr. Shiva, that Dominion Machines swapped votes counting Trump votes at 7/10ths of a vote, and Biden votes as 1.3 votes, here are the actual legal vote totals for the 2020 Election

President Trump 98,028,452 votes
Joe Biden 56,161,000

 

[Daryl Hunt]

More bovine excrement.

Clinton never tried to thwart the will of the Voters of any state by pretending there was wide spread fraud.

The Democrat party did. Russian collusion, phony impeachment, spying on Trump's associates........

Actually, it was the AG. The fact remains that Rump tried to use his office to affect the outcome of the 2020 election by attempting to coerce another Government to do a fake investigation on the only Democrat that had the ability to defeat him in 2020 by claiming to refuse badly needed funds for Ukraines Defense against Russia. Then he tried to cover it up. At least all Nixon was really guilty of was a coverup trying to keep his people out of prison. I list each and every Republican Senator save one as complicant to those crimes.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has every right to interpret the Pennsylvania Constitution. Unless you passed the state Bar examination in Pennsylvania, you have no clue what you are talking about.

Why do you keep bringing up the PA Constitution when it has nothing to do with that?

 

[airplanemechanic]

That's not "evidence presented in court" Einstein

Anyone can say shit on the Internet

We know for an absolute fact that in heavily democrat counties they were allowed to "cure" their ballots. In the major republican strongholds they were NOT allowed to do so. This is factual and indisputable. This is also not fair or legal.

 

[airplanemechanic]

More bovine excrement.

Clinton never tried to thwart the will of the Voters of any state by pretending there was wide spread fraud.

The Democrat party did. Russian collusion, phony impeachment, spying on Trump's associates........

Actually, it was the AG. The fact remains that Rump tried to use his office to affect the outcome of the 2020 election by attempting to coerce another Government to do a fake investigation on the only Democrat that had the ability to defeat him in 2020 by claiming to refuse badly needed funds for Ukraines Defense against Russia. Then he tried to cover it up. At least all Nixon was really guilty of was a coverup trying to keep his people out of prison. I list each and every Republican Senator save one as complicant to those crimes.

Hmm, fake investigation, attempting to affect the outcome of an election, using a foreign gov't to do so......where have I heard that before?

Don't like it when democrat tactics are used against democrats huh?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

There is absolutely no evidence that mail-in voting is subject to fraud. Several states routinely send out mail-in ballots to registered voters who are active. There has been no major fraud. They did check the signatures despite your best5 efforts to smear ordinary people.

Which is why out of the over 250 signed under oath affidavits, we have poll workers who said they were instructed not to verify signatures.

And yet, when push comes to shove, not one is brought forward in the various courts of law. Let's say, for argument sake, they have the proof. If you just say you have the proof and never present it first hand then your Lawyer is an Idiot. Okay, Rudy is an idiot but if the old firms had that proof THEY would have presented it and you wouldn't be making a damned fool of yourself. Sorry, you can't blame this one on Rump or Rudy. It's long since gone past that. You own it.

 

[Faun]

When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.

He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.

Like the one from the USPS who recanted his sworn affidavit the moment it colided with scrutiny? Those affidavits may be evidence but you're not proof.

he didnt recant,,

Liar...

"I didn't specifically overhear the whole story. I just heard a part of it," Hopkins said in the recording. "And I could have missed a lot of it."​

​

"My mind probably added the rest. I understand that," he said at another point, adding: "All it is is hearsay, and that's the worst part."​

​

When an agent asked Hopkins in the recording if he would still swear to the affidavit's claim that the postmaster "was back-dating ballots," he replied: "At this point? No."​

​

​

thanks for your edited version of events,,,

LOL

Those quotes from Richard Hopkins are all in that link I posted. He recanted. He admitted what he heard is hearsay and incomplete and his own mind probably filled in some details. Even worse, when asked if he still swears to the affidavit he signed, he said, "at this point, no."

HE DID NOT RECANT YOU STUPID DING-A-LING


Project Veritas Releases RAW and UNEDITED Audio of 2 Hour Coercive Interrogation of USPS Whistleblower Richard Hopkins by Federal Agents


.

LOLOL

It's not my problem you don't understand English. His affidavit claims, "Weisenbach and Locke discussed how on November 4, 2020, they had back-dated the postmark on all but one of the ballots collected on November 4, 2020 to make it appear as though the ballots had instead been collected on November 3, 2020."

Only in that "raw and unedited audio," he admits all he heard was, "fourth ballots picked up." And then I heard them saying something about the [post]markings being on the third. One was [postmarked] the fourth. That's it.

... he then continues, saying everything else in his affidavit was based on his own assumptions ... I would say the conversation, the fact that I heard that they're, you know, based on my assumption on what I could hear was that they were post-marking them the third that were picked up on the fourth.

He even admits he never heard the word, "back-date," despite claiming in his affidavit that they back-dated ballots...

Strasser: "Did you ever, ever, ever hear the word, back-date?"

Hopkins: "No"​

Then he recants the meat of his affidavit as Strasser reads directly from paragraph 3 from Hopkins affidavit (keep in mind, Hopkins didn't even write the affidavit he signed, Project Veritas wrote it)...

Strasser: "As discussed more fully below, I heard Weisenbach tell a supervisor at my office that Weisenbach was back-dating the postmarks on the ballots to make it appear as though the ballots had been collected on November 3, 2020 despite them in fact being collected on November 4 and possibly later."

Hopkins: "Okay, that's definitely a lot more specific than what I would have"

Strasser: "Would you agree with me that based on what you and I discussed today, that this paragraph, and I haven't read the rest of the affidavit, but this paragraph specifically, number three, has a significant amount of interpretation in it?"

Hopkins: "Yes."

Strasser: "And interpretation is not necessarily fact. Do you agree?"

Hopkins: "Yes."​

In his affidavit, he swore, I overheard Weisenbach tell Locke that they “messed up yesterday.” But in the USPS office of IG, he changed that to, "I do not remember clearly if the words, "messed up," were used.

His 6th paragraph stated, my understanding of Pennsylvania law is that ballots cannot be counted unless they were mailed by 8:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020. Weisenbach’s comments were deeply concerning to me and appeared to me to be an attempt by Weisenbach and/or Locke to improperly backdate ballots received after the legal deadline so these late ballots could be counted – something I understand to be illegal and against Pennsylvania law. Accordingly, I brought Weisenbach’s information to the public through Project Veritas.

He completely removed that entire paragraph from his claims.

Savvy?

He went from saying he heard them discussing how they backdated ballots on the 4th to be postmarked on the 3rd .... to saying he never heard them saying they backdated anything and that he "assumed" that's what they were discussing. And of course, there's...

Hopkins: "It [his affidavit] was written up by the Veritas' lawyer"​

​

Strasser: "That's fair, that's fair."​

​

Klein: "Okay. So, but, just so I'm getting this correct. As we sit here today, you wouldn't swear to that paragraph."​

​

Hopkins: "At this point? No."​

​

​

​

​

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And yet, when push comes to shove, not one is brought forward in the various courts of law. Let's say, for argument sake, they have the proof. If you just say you have the proof and never present it first hand then your Lawyer is an Idiot. Okay, Rudy is an idiot but if the old firms had that proof THEY

You should get a copy of Rudy's presentation in Arizona today and you'd see all the proof they have. It's still going on if you want to catch the end of it on OAN.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

That's not "evidence presented in court" Einstein

Anyone can say shit on the Internet

We know for an absolute fact that in heavily democrat counties they were allowed to "cure" their ballots. In the major republican strongholds they were NOT allowed to do so. This is factual and indisputable. This is also not fair or legal.

According to the latest District Court of Appeals, it certainly IS legal. Okay, maybe not fair but the Republican strongholds can make it fair and even any time this wish by allowing the same rights that the Dem Strongholds allow. The Republicans in Penn created this huge ClusterF**k and now they want to deny the Dems their right to vote.

 

[Faun]

For anybody interested, turn on OAN. They have a software expert testifying in Arizona talking about the smartmatic software and how easily it's manipulated. His claim is they found malware and algorithms that shifted votes. He also claims that the software was connected to the internet.

Dumbfuck, Dominion is not Smartmatic.

 

[AceRothstein]

Trump lost Pennsylvania.

 

[airplanemechanic]

That's not "evidence presented in court" Einstein

Anyone can say shit on the Internet

We know for an absolute fact that in heavily democrat counties they were allowed to "cure" their ballots. In the major republican strongholds they were NOT allowed to do so. This is factual and indisputable. This is also not fair or legal.

According to the latest District Court of Appeals, it certainly IS legal. Okay, maybe not fair but the Republican strongholds can make it fair and even any time this wish by allowing the same rights that the Dem Strongholds allow. The Republicans in Penn created this huge ClusterF**k and now they want to deny the Dems their right to vote.

You can't just say its legal and that makes it so.

It is against PA law to allow ballots to be "fixed." They are supposed to be discarded. The law says so.

View Document - Unofficial Purdon's Pennsylvania Statutes from Westlaw

govt.westlaw.com

“No person observing, attending or participating in a pre-canvass meeting may disclose the results of any portion of any pre-canvass meeting prior to the close of the polls.”

 

[Faun]

Why are Republican leaders so afraid to validate and confirm the legitimacy of their state election process?
Is it not in the interests of the public, of the integrity of the voting process, and of the Republicans themselves when it is their opponents that are making the fraud (alledgedly) benefit their candidates?

Why wont republicans hear the evidence from the Trump lawyers?

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

****************************************************************

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4th appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:​

​

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.​

​

Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud occurred to change the election results in several states. That Keshavarz-Nia provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, renders him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather opaque to anyone without an enormous amount of training and experience in his field. This requires many of us to take what he says on faith.​

​

Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter Integrity Project (VIP) approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane fashion. His team analyzed publicly available data on absentee ballots and he explained his findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings involved people who changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee using their prior address. In Arizona, which Biden “won” by 10,457 votes, there were 19,997 questionable votes. In Georgia, which Biden “won” by 12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden “won” by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such votes. As Braynard told the Epoch Times:​

​

This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly questionable.… I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state.… I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast absentee ballots back in Georgia.… I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election.​

​

Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the Voter Integrity Project to Monday’s hearing with members of Arizona’s legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted Friday, “The VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA, MI, WI, and AZ, including declarations we collected.” Sunday, another tweet by Braynard revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may indicate illegal ballots. Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/twnship had 781.91% turnout. How does this happen?”​

​

Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120%. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100% turnout.​

Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Election experts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands.

spectator.org

​

​

The voting anamolies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump​

A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump"​

​

According to the data study:​

​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

"I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible."

What a pity for Trump that Smartmatic was not used in any one of the battleground states.

 

[The Original Tree]

And yet, when push comes to shove, not one is brought forward in the various courts of law. Let's say, for argument sake, they have the proof. If you just say you have the proof and never present it first hand then your Lawyer is an Idiot. Okay, Rudy is an idiot but if the old firms had that proof THEY

You should get a copy of Rudy's presentation in Arizona today and you'd see all the proof they have. It's still going on if you want to catch the end of it on OAN.

It's disgusting the lengths they went to Sin against Heaven and The 93 Million People who voted for President Trump.

I'm surprised to find out that I am only 7/10ths of a person, according to Democrat Fraud Machines used in The 6 states that cheated.

Dr Shiva from MIT just proved Vote Swapping Live on TV at The Arizona Hearing.

130% of Democrats voted for Biden vs. -30% voted for Trump.

If you are a Republican, you are only 7/10ths of a person.

Based on the revelation from MIT Scientist Dr. Shiva, that Dominion Machines swapped votes counting Trump votes at 7/10ths of a vote, and Biden votes as 1.3 votes, here are the actual legal vote totals for the 2020 Election

President Trump 98,028,452 votes
Joe Biden 56,161,000

 

[Faun]

Why are Republican leaders so afraid to validate and confirm the legitimacy of their state election process?
Is it not in the interests of the public, of the integrity of the voting process, and of the Republicans themselves when it is their opponents that are making the fraud (alledgedly) benefit their candidates?

Why wont republicans hear the evidence from the Trump lawyers?

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

****************************************************************

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4th appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:​

​

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.​

​

Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud occurred to change the election results in several states. That Keshavarz-Nia provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, renders him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather opaque to anyone without an enormous amount of training and experience in his field. This requires many of us to take what he says on faith.​

​

Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter Integrity Project (VIP) approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane fashion. His team analyzed publicly available data on absentee ballots and he explained his findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings involved people who changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee using their prior address. In Arizona, which Biden “won” by 10,457 votes, there were 19,997 questionable votes. In Georgia, which Biden “won” by 12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden “won” by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such votes. As Braynard told the Epoch Times:​

​

This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly questionable.… I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state.… I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast absentee ballots back in Georgia.… I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election.​

​

Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the Voter Integrity Project to Monday’s hearing with members of Arizona’s legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted Friday, “The VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA, MI, WI, and AZ, including declarations we collected.” Sunday, another tweet by Braynard revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may indicate illegal ballots. Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/twnship had 781.91% turnout. How does this happen?”​

​

Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120%. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100% turnout.​

Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Election experts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands.

spectator.org

​

​

The voting anamolies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump​

A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump"​

​

According to the data study:​

​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

I'm surprised to find out that I am only 7/10ths of a person, according to Democrat Fraud Machines used in The 6 states that cheated.

Dr Shiva from MIT just proved Vote Swapping Live on TV at The Arizona Hearing.

130% of Democrats voted for Biden vs. -30% voted for Trump.

If you are a Republican, you are only 7/10ths of a person.

Based on the revelation from MIT Scientist Dr. Shiva, that Dominion Machines swapped votes counting Trump votes at 7/10ths of a vote, and Biden votes as 1.3 votes, here are the actual legal vote totals for the 2020 Election

President Trump 98,028,452 votes
Joe Biden 56,161,000

LOL

Yay! Trump wins!

 

[Toro]

You can't just say its legal and that makes it so.

It is against PA law to allow ballots to be "fixed." They are supposed to be discarded. The law says so.

View Document - Unofficial Purdon's Pennsylvania Statutes from Westlaw

govt.westlaw.com

“No person observing, attending or participating in a pre-canvass meeting may disclose the results of any portion of any pre-canvass meeting prior to the close of the polls.”

The PA SC disagrees

They addressed this in their ruling.

Which, BTW, is made up of three Republican appointees. And the writer of the opinion was appointed by Trump.

 

[Faun]

There is absolutely no evidence that mail-in voting is subject to fraud. Several states routinely send out mail-in ballots to registered voters who are active. There has been no major fraud. They did check the signatures despite your best5 efforts to smear ordinary people.

Which is why out of the over 250 signed under oath affidavits, we have poll workers who said they were instructed not to verify signatures.

How do you know there are "over 250 signed under oath affidavits?" You haven't seen them. No court has seen them.

 

[Faun]

No they must not be removed. They do not change the outcome.

Yes they should be removed because they didn't get there by the end of election day. That's what the PA law states.

You're still lying.

In Pennsylvania, no votes that came in after 8PM on election day were counted.

 

[Toro]

No they must not be removed. They do not change the outcome.

Yes they should be removed because they didn't get there by the end of election day. That's what the PA law states.

The number of votes that arrived after the polls closed was less than 10,000, so it wouldn't have mattered.

But the PA SC addressed this.

They ruled that PA law allows flexibility in handling and processing ballots, and that the three-day extension was deemed to be reasonable.