PA House Introduces a Resolution: The Election Process Shall Be Declared Improper.

[JimBowie1958]

Your claims are unsubstianted and laughed out of the courts of law.
But but but Russia!
Deflection.

No one expects a set of Dimborcrap court judges to honestly evaluate evidence THAT THEY REFUSE TO ALLOW TO BE PRESENTED.

Huh, how the hell does that work Coyote? You say that they laughed the evidence out of court when they refused to even hear it.

They weren't laughing at the evidence, they were laughing at you stupid Dims for not having the presence of mind to stop allowing voting machines to be hackable and open to the internet, to include China, Russia, the Norks and anydamendbody else.

 

[busybee01]

Yes we do. There is a safe harbor provision that ends any further challenges if the state certifies the results 6 days before electors meet. That is why any further recounting was halted by the Supreme Court in Florida.

That had nothing to do with it. The judge changed Florida law on the bench. That was the problem, just like this judge changed the PA law on the bench.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has every right to interpret the Pennsylvania Constitution. Unless you passed the state Bar examination in Pennsylvania, you have no clue what you are talking about.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Why are Republican leaders so afraid to validate and confirm the legitimacy of their state election process?
Is it not in the interests of the public, of the integrity of the voting process, and of the Republicans themselves when it is their opponents that are making the fraud (alledgedly) benefit their candidates?

Why wont republicans hear the evidence from the Trump lawyers?

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

****************************************************************

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly. It’s unlikely that either publication will be singing his praises for his work pursuant to the recent election. His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4th appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:​

​

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.​

​

Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud occurred to change the election results in several states. That Keshavarz-Nia provides his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, renders him highly credible. Still, his conclusions are rather opaque to anyone without an enormous amount of training and experience in his field. This requires many of us to take what he says on faith.​

​

Bearing this in mind, Matt Braynard of the Voter Integrity Project (VIP) approached the 2020 results in a far less arcane fashion. His team analyzed publicly available data on absentee ballots and he explained his findings in a way that any intelligent voter can understand. VIP looked at suspicious ballot activity in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the most significant VIP findings involved people who changed their state of residence, yet voted absentee using their prior address. In Arizona, which Biden “won” by 10,457 votes, there were 19,997 questionable votes. In Georgia, which Biden “won” by 12,670 votes, VIP found 138,221 such votes. In Wisconsin, which Biden “won” by 20,608 votes, there were 26,673 such votes. As Braynard told the Epoch Times:​

​

This election, it appears to me, has been decided by ballots that are highly questionable.… I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state.… I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast absentee ballots back in Georgia.… I have no confidence that Joe Biden is the deserved winner of this election.​

​

Braynard has been asked to present the findings of the Voter Integrity Project to Monday’s hearing with members of Arizona’s legislature. Moreover, as Braynard tweeted Friday, “The VIP findings have also been included in court filings in PA, GA, MI, WI, and AZ, including declarations we collected.” Sunday, another tweet by Braynard revealed that the FBI has proactively requested VIP findings that may indicate illegal ballots. Meanwhile, no discussion of 2020 election skulduggery is complete without a discussion of the Democrat precincts that record more votes than registered voters. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) tweeted the following on that perennial topic: “According to an affidavit in the MI lawsuit, one Michigan precinct/twnship had 781.91% turnout. How does this happen?”​

​

Good question. No fewer than six precincts listed by Rep. Posey experienced turnout exceeding 120%. Another 10 allegedly enjoyed 100% turnout.​

Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Election experts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands.

spectator.org

​

​

The voting anamolies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump​

A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump​

An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump"​

​

According to the data study:​

​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

 

[busybee01]

That's not what this Colonel is testifying to.

He’s far from the first person to pull this bait and switch.

What bait and switch? You should have watched it. Very interesting. Not easy to follow unless you're into the tech stuff, but I learned a little bit about it.

What he basically said is that the Dominion system can be easily manipulated because it was connected to the internet which it shouldn't have been. How to manipulate the system is even in the owners manual. The voting patterns are very similar to what happened in Venezuela where Chavez had the system rigged for him to win. The system was created for this reason--to provide a desired outcome. Even if there was nothing nefarious about what people in our government might have done, the malware they found gave "whoever" the ability to steal passwords the administrators used.

Bottom line is the Chinese could have gotten passwords to get into the system and rig the election for Biden. What he did find is that the votes in Arizona were uploaded to Germany. While we can get subpoenas to confiscate our machines and software for evaluation, changing the votes in another country and sending them back is harder to prove since we don't have international power to confiscate their technology for examination.

What this expert testified to should be on every MSM channel in the country, but we both know that will never happen. We are using technology that's can (and was in this election) easily manipulated.

Bottom line is that you are proving you are too crazy to vote. There was no conspiracy. you are a crazy right wing fascist.

 

[busybee01]

VERY interesting --- well worth watching. Thanx for that. Dershowitz says the Trump strategy is to move the election to the House on the basis that enough electoral votes are tied up with these various challenges so that Biden does not get 270. And then send it to the House ----- where Trump wins, as each state gets one vote and there are more Republican states.

Could be some surprises still, then. I know it doesn't seem likely, but Dershowitz said something like this happened four times during the 1800s --- I remember a couple cases, but not four. One of the times I remember it was indeed the strategy of the losing party to win ---------- anyway. I don't remember what ended up happening. We may need to do some quick heavy reading on constitutional law.

I don't agree with his politics, but I respect the guy for not sticking next to the Democrat party good or bad. However he was a Democrat back when Democrats had some integrity.

It is Republicans who have no integrity. They have refused to speak out against Trump's attempts to steal the election. They have put up with Trump and allowed him to get away with all his bullshit.

 

[busybee01]

One problem. No votes were counted that came in after the cutoff. This is a losing proposition for you and your partyofthrumpers. Comon, you are a smart guy usually. What gives. Is winning so important that you are willing to look foolish?

Votes were counted until Friday. They were only ordered by a judge to be separated until this all clears up in case the court rules they must be removed from the count.

No they must not be removed. They do not change the outcome.

 

[Circe]

...Trump's attempts to steal the election. They have put up with Trump and allowed him to get away with all his bullshit.

Why not? What are you afraid of? Are you afraid Trump will win the election after all? I can't understand what your big gripe is --- after all, it was the Left that tried to undo the last election. It's just our turn now.

 

[busybee01]

It's still not enough to overturn the election. Let's say that the State Law is overturned (good luck on that one) and the Republican Legislature gets to name the EC, it's still not enough to effect the overall election. All this is just a way to keep throwing dirt on the election to undermine our nation. Will it stop come Dec. 6th when the EC has to cast it's ballots or is it going to go on and on and on.. I vote for it to stop but you are voting for it to go on and on.

The only really successful coups are when the dictator arrests and eliminates his opponent completely. Is that your intention? Coups are rarely bloodless.

No, it will not change the election by itself, but remember there are accusations all over the place. You have claims of workers submitting the same Biden ballots over and over again into the machine, signatures that were never checked or poll workers instructed not to look at them, auto signature machines that were set below 50% sensitivity, twice as many absentee ballots returned than were sent out, just all kinds of problems.

The current count for electoral votes is Biden 306 and Trump 232. If they turn PA, that puts Biden at 286 and Trump at 252. That's just one state. There are irregularities in several of these battleground states. The whole thing is suspicious.

The fact that boring Biden got 10 million more votes than DumBama is telling right there. Yes, there is a lot of hatred for Trump on a personal level, but he's been the best President we've had since Reagan. The total amount of votes this election is 154 million. That's one million more than the amount of registered voters in 2018. Explain how that happened!

Pennsylvania will not be overturned. Accusations do not equate to proof. Again you seek to slander people with no hard evidence.

Trump has been the worst President we have ever had. Ronald Reagan would never be a part of the Trump Republican Party. It is built on hatred of everyone except white males.

 

[busybee01]

Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)

That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.

There is absolutely no evidence that mail-in voting is subject to fraud. Several states routinely send out mail-in ballots to registered voters who are active. There has been no major fraud. They did check the signatures despite your best5 efforts to smear ordinary people.

 

[busybee01]

Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.

Trump knew that mail in voting opens the election up to more fraud. Voting in person, you have to bring an ID with you and prove who you are. Mail in, anybody can send the stupid thing in.

So you say. You have no clue what you are talking about.

 

[busybee01]

even obama knew that mail in was unsafe,,,

I think at this point we need to eliminate mail in voting with the exception for those who cannot physically vote. We also need to eliminate technology at this point. Every place gets hand counted and each ballot needs to be examined by a member from each party. It will take much longer, but it also gives everybody assurance the election was not rigged.

Mail in voting should not be elimiated. They should be a permanent option for all voters. The election are not rigged.

 

[busybee01]

When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.

He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.

He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.

Trump's Legal Team can only file VERIFIED COMPLAINTS

They can not force "judges" to be neutral, impartial and to adhere to legal maxims.

But WE THE PEOPLE know that the Deep State (Brennan, Clapper , Fauci, et al )

concocted the covid19 HOAX in order to tank the economy, cause 40 million Americans to be unemployed and force numerous businesses into bankruptcy hoping that Americans would take out their anger against President Trump.

They also wanted to give the states , which were so inclined , the pretext to use the FRAUDULENT mail in ballots.

Then they forced the media to censor the President and Republicans . The MSM was blaming the President 24/7 for NON EXISTENT - gazillions covid19 deaths and "new" cases.

The pattern used in the US is exactly the same the CIA has used in foreign countries to create "color revolutions".

You can be naive and gullible but you can not force the rest of us to do the same.


.

Trump supporters are the most gullible fools. Trump is making money off of you stupid clowns.

 

[busybee01]

For anybody interested, turn on OAN. They have a software expert testifying in Arizona talking about the smartmatic software and how easily it's manipulated. His claim is they found malware and algorithms that shifted votes. He also claims that the software was connected to the internet.

OAN is fake news.

 

[BlindBoo]

it was the Left that tried to undo the last election. It's just our turn now.

More bovine excrement.

Clinton never tried to thwart the will of the Voters of any state by pretending there was wide spread fraud.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

More bovine excrement.

Clinton never tried to thwart the will of the Voters of any state by pretending there was wide spread fraud.

The Democrat party did. Russian collusion, phony impeachment, spying on Trump's associates........

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

For anybody interested, turn on OAN. They have a software expert testifying in Arizona talking about the smartmatic software and how easily it's manipulated. His claim is they found malware and algorithms that shifted votes. He also claims that the software was connected to the internet.

OAN is fake news.

It has nothing to do with OAN, they are airing the testimony in Arizona of people to substantiate this election was a fraud.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump supporters are the most gullible fools. Trump is making money off of you stupid clowns.

Trump donated every presidential paycheck he received, and lost over a billion dollars of net worth as President.

 

[Toro]

PA house steps in on the fraudulent election process.


In the immediate future, we will be introducing the following resolution:

...

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.

House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

www.legis.state.pa.us

The bill died today.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Mail in voting should not be elimiated. They should be a permanent option for all voters. The election are not rigged.

Of course you feel that way because we both know mail in opens up the door to more fraud which is the only way Democrats can win elections.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There is absolutely no evidence that mail-in voting is subject to fraud. Several states routinely send out mail-in ballots to registered voters who are active. There has been no major fraud. They did check the signatures despite your best5 efforts to smear ordinary people.

Which is why out of the over 250 signed under oath affidavits, we have poll workers who said they were instructed not to verify signatures.