Overpaid CEOs and Greedy Capitalists.. oh my!

[itfitzme]

Poverty in the People's Republic of China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"(poverty being defined as the number of people living on < $1.25/day)."

Kinda setting the bar a bit low.

"Since the start of far-reaching economic reforms in the late 1970s, growth has fueled a remarkable increase in per capita income and a decline in the poverty rate from 85% in 1981 to 13.1% in 2008 (poverty being defined as the number of people living on < $1.25/day).[2] At the same time, however, income disparities have increased. The growing income inequality is illustrated most clearly by the differences in living standards between the urban, coastal areas and the rural, inland regions. There have also been increases in the inequality of health and education outcomes. Exact statistics are disputed, as there have been reports of China's underestimating the poverty rate.[3]"

Live less than $1.25 a day 13.1% (172 million)
Live less than $2 a day
29.8% (394 million)
Live less than $2.5 a day 39.9% (528 million)
Live less than $4 a day 62% (821 million)
Live less than $5 a day
71.6% (948 million)

Now, what to do about that 58.5%, <$5 and >$1.25

 

[itfitzme]

*liberals a sworn and deadly enemy of the people the likes of which the world has never seen before!

Really?

What "liberal" ever said the free-market, capitalism, and competition is entirely without merit?*What was his name...Keynes...that's one of your "liberal" guys, isn't it? Is that what he said, that capitalism is completely evil?

I suspect that you exaggerate things a tad bit.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

*liberals a sworn and deadly enemy of the people the likes of which the world has never seen before!

Really?

What "liberal" ever said the free-market, capitalism, and competition is entirely without merit?*What was his name...Keynes...that's one of your "liberal" guys, isn't it? Is that what he said, that capitalism is completely evil?

I suspect that you exaggerate things a tad bit.

dear, Obama had two communist parents and voted to the left of Bernie Sanders and just socialized 20% of America with Obamacare!!
Where would we be without heroic Republicans speaking the truth in the face of this treason??


Norman Thomas quotes:
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy, Socialism, and Public Education « Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

" Between 1990 and 2010, about 663 million people moved above the absolute poverty level." [worldwide]

Does that number jive with China moving half of the world population out of poverty? (absolute poverty, I assume)

according to Fareed Zakaria GPS world poverty went from 2 billion to 1.2 billion ( 40% of world poverty eliminated) when Republicans introduced capitalism to China in 1980.

Perhaps the worlds greatest miracle!!

 

[itfitzme]

*liberals a sworn and deadly enemy of the people the likes of which the world has never seen before!

Really?

What "liberal" ever said the free-market, capitalism, and competition is entirely without merit?*What was his name...Keynes...that's one of your "liberal" guys, isn't it? *Is that what he said, that capitalism is completely evil?

I suspect that you exaggerate things a tad bit.

dear, Obama had two communist parents and voted to the left of Bernie Sanders and just socialized 20% of America with Obamacare!!
Where would *we be without heroic Republicans speaking the truth in the face of this treason??*


Norman Thomas quotes: *
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
*
*
This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:*
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]*

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy, Socialism, and Public Education « Conservative Colloquium*
*
*
Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

Well there you go... that wasn't my question. *

I aske who did?

Rather, it seems, your answer is that... a conservati e said that it is the "liberal's" secret agenda. *

Wow....

Does the term "paranoid delusional conspiracy theorist" mean anything to you? *(It's a common symptom of alchoholism. You don't happen to drink alchohol daily, do you? Just trying to eliminate potential candidates)

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Well there you go... that wasn't my question. *

I aske who did?

who did what?????????????????????????? you forgot to say????????///

 

[Boss]

*liberals a sworn and deadly enemy of the people the likes of which the world has never seen before!

Really?

What "liberal" ever said the free-market, capitalism, and competition is entirely without merit?*What was his name...Keynes...that's one of your "liberal" guys, isn't it? Is that what he said, that capitalism is completely evil?

I suspect that you exaggerate things a tad bit.

That's basically what every lefty in this thread has said. If anyone mentions "corporations" your eyes glaze over and foam starts to emerge from the corners of your mouth as you growl incessantly. You then reel off an endless barrage of propaganda links from known Socialist entities, and ironically, argue for the exact same system Mao introduced in China.

And no, it's not an exaggeration, go read up on the People's Revolution, and the rhetoric which prompted the overthrow of the Chinese government which installed Mao. It's exactly the same message we hear from the Occutards.... the 1% control all the wealth... the 99% have nothing... something MUST be done!

Well, in China, they installed Mao, who immediately rounded up all the "rich greedy capitalists" and killed them, confiscated all their wealth, and imposed harsh penalties on anyone practicing capitalism. You libtards would have been having orgasms in the streets! But what happened as a result was, 70 million people died. The Chinese economy tanked because... hey, there were no more capitalists who knew how to generate prosperity through capitalism, they were all dead. This Utopian Dream the People thought they were going to get, never transpired. Instead, China plunged deeper into poverty and despair for another 50 years, until Mao finally died, and they could start implementing pro-capitalist policies again. In just a few decades, they are surpassing the US in economic growth.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

*liberals a sworn and deadly enemy of the people the likes of which the world has never seen before!

Really?

What "liberal" ever said the free-market, capitalism, and competition is entirely without merit?*What was his name...Keynes...that's one of your "liberal" guys, isn't it? Is that what he said, that capitalism is completely evil?

I suspect that you exaggerate things a tad bit.

That's basically what every lefty in this thread has said. If anyone mentions "corporations" your eyes glaze over and foam starts to emerge from the corners of your mouth as you growl incessantly. You then reel off an endless barrage of propaganda links from known Socialist entities, and ironically, argue for the exact same system Mao introduced in China.

And no, it's not an exaggeration, go read up on the People's Revolution, and the rhetoric which prompted the overthrow of the Chinese government which installed Mao. It's exactly the same message we hear from the Occutards.... the 1% control all the wealth... the 99% have nothing... something MUST be done!

Well, in China, they installed Mao, who immediately rounded up all the "rich greedy capitalists" and killed them, confiscated all their wealth, and imposed harsh penalties on anyone practicing capitalism. You libtards would have been having orgasms in the streets! But what happened as a result was, 70 million people died. The Chinese economy tanked because... hey, there were no more capitalists who knew how to generate prosperity through capitalism, they were all dead. This Utopian Dream the People thought they were going to get, never transpired. Instead, China plunged deeper into poverty and despair for another 50 years, until Mao finally died, and they could start implementing pro-capitalist policies again. In just a few decades, they are surpassing the US in economic growth.

Great post!! It seems perfectly obvious but still the liberals cant grasp it. They seem to have the intellectual capacity of idiots or children, plus, they have no shame about seeming so deadly slow.
They have been brainwashed to feel they are right, and so are impervious to even elementary reasoning.

 

[OnePercenter]

More resourses lead to inefficiency. Raw materials, labor and money are all resourses. Non profits like the Red Cross have been inefficient when contributions were high. Solyndra was inefficient in their use of funds. The military, the gov't, individuals and even private companies become inefficient with their use of money when it is readily available.

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own. Why do you think solar panel costs dropped 50% in one year?

Better hurry! Sale ends soon!

Google

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own.

dear, the Solyndra failure was a standard soviet failure like all of Obama's green energy failures that were going to rescue the economy with green next generation jobs. Obama had all the confidence and bluster of a Hitler Stalin Mao or Castro.

The liberal press does not see all the soviet Obama failures as a scandal, for some reason??

Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy=

 

[AmazonTania]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own. Why do you think solar panel costs dropped 50% in one year?

Solyndra was subsidised by the US Government as well. Maybe you failed to realise the millions of dollars wasted on it. It failed simply because the market does not believe solar energy is a viable alternative to oil as of yet. Although the price may of dropped, not enough to stimulate any market demand.

You cannot create phony demand simply by spending money on products or throwing money down a bureaucratic rat hole.

There is a reason why no one needs to subsidise the iPhone. It was produced. People seem to like it. That's it.

 

[OnePercenter]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own.

dear, the Solyndra failure was a standard soviet failure like all of Obama's green energy failures that were going to rescue the economy with green next generation jobs. Obama had all the confidence and bluster of a Hitler Stalin Mao or Castro.

The liberal press does not see all the soviet Obama failures as a scandal, for some reason??

Factless blow-V-ating like a true minion.

 

[itfitzme]

*liberals a sworn and deadly enemy of the people the likes of which the world has never seen before!

Really?

What "liberal" ever said the free-market, capitalism, and competition is entirely without merit?*What was his name...Keynes...that's one of your "liberal" guys, isn't it? *Is that what he said, that capitalism is completely evil?

I suspect that you exaggerate things a tad bit.

"your eyes glaze over and foam starts to emerge from the corners of your mouth as you growl incessantly. You then reel off an endless barrage of propaganda links "

Really? Me personally? Growl incessantly?

I asked a simple question that you have yet to answer simply

 

[itfitzme]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own. Why do you think solar panel costs dropped 50% in one year?

Solyndra was subsidised by the US Government as well. Maybe you failed to realise the millions of dollars wasted on it. It failed simply because the market does not believe solar energy is a viable alternative to oil as of yet. Although the price may of dropped, not enough to stimulate any market demand.

You cannot create phony demand simply by spending money on products or throwing money down a bureaucratic rat hole.

There is a reason why no one needs to subsidise the iPhone. It was produced. People seem to like it. That's it.

Japanese companies, some decades past, were bankrolled by the Japanese banks to take the electronics markets, for as long as it took, as long as they showed increasing market share. The smart thing was market share was more relavent then profits. Losses were allowed, as long as they were increasing market share. And it worked.

 

[OnePercenter]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own. Why do you think solar panel costs dropped 50% in one year?

Solyndra was subsidised by the US Government as well. Maybe you failed to realise the millions of dollars wasted on it. It failed simply because the market does not believe solar energy is a viable alternative to oil as of yet. Although the price may of dropped, not enough to stimulate any market demand.

You cannot create phony demand simply by spending money on products or throwing money down a bureaucratic rat hole.

There is a reason why no one needs to subsidise the iPhone. It was produced. People seem to like it. That's it.

If Samsung started giving away their new Galaxy 4's the iPhone WOULD need subsidity. Which makes my point.

 

[OnePercenter]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own. Why do you think solar panel costs dropped 50% in one year?

Solyndra was subsidised by the US Government as well. Maybe you failed to realise the millions of dollars wasted on it. It failed simply because the market does not believe solar energy is a viable alternative to oil as of yet. Although the price may of dropped, not enough to stimulate any market demand.

You cannot create phony demand simply by spending money on products or throwing money down a bureaucratic rat hole.

There is a reason why no one needs to subsidise the iPhone. It was produced. People seem to like it. That's it.

Japanese companies, some decades past, were bankrolled by the Japanese banks to take the electronics markets, for as long as it took, as long as they showed increasing market share. The smart thing was market share was more relavent then profits. Losses were allowed, as long as they were increasing market share. And it worked.

Plus a big shot in the arm when Reagan allowed the Japanese to product dump in the early 80's.

 

[itfitzme]

Plus a big shot in the arm when Reagan allowed the Japanese to product dump in the early 80's.

Interesting...*

Your going to leave me to look it up myself, aren't you...

grrrr...

 

[Boss]

The Solyndra failure as well as all every other solor panel manufacturer failure in the world was due to the Chinese Government subsidizing their own. Why do you think solar panel costs dropped 50% in one year?

Solyndra was subsidised by the US Government as well. Maybe you failed to realise the millions of dollars wasted on it. It failed simply because the market does not believe solar energy is a viable alternative to oil as of yet. Although the price may of dropped, not enough to stimulate any market demand.

You cannot create phony demand simply by spending money on products or throwing money down a bureaucratic rat hole.

There is a reason why no one needs to subsidise the iPhone. It was produced. People seem to like it. That's it.

If Samsung started giving away their new Galaxy 4's the iPhone WOULD need subsidity. Which makes my point.

Certain providers routinely "give away" a particular phone to get your business, and iPhone hasn't needed subsidizing. Your point just failed.

 

[OnePercenter]

Plus a big shot in the arm when Reagan allowed the Japanese to product dump in the early 80's.

Interesting...*

Your going to leave me to look it up myself, aren't you...

grrrr...

Reagan Commerce Department snoozing abit.

1/86 US FINDS JAPANESE DUMPING--AUTOMOBILE TELEPHONES, OIL RIGS & TYPEWRITER RIBBONS.

In October 1985, the US Commerce Department found Japanese makers of Automobile telephones, excluding Toshiba, guilty of dumping their products in the US. The International Trade Commission was given 45 days to determine whether US makers had been damaged by the dumping. If it finds such conditions, antidumping duties will be imposed. The Department of Commerce recommended that antidumping duties of 106.6% be imposed on the makes of Matsushita Communications Industrial, 95.57% for the makes of NEC, 87.5% for Mitsubishi Electric, 9.7% for Oki Electric and 2.9% for Hitachi. The suit had been filed in November, 1984 by Motorola.

In November 1985 the US Commerce Department ruled that Nippon Steel and Hitachi Zozen had been dumping oil rig equipment in the US. An antidumping tariff of 56.7% was imposed on the products of Nippon Steel and a 9.71% duty for Hitachi Zozen. The International Trade Commission must now rule whether US makers were damaged by the dumping. In this relation, a California Congressman has filed a bill requiring that all oil rig equipment used on the US continental shelf be American made.

In November 1985 the US Commerce Department ruled that two Japanese makers of ribbons for typewriter ribbons and computer printer ribbons were dumping their products in the US. Antidumping duties of 5.48% and 0.08% were imposed. A final decision will be made in February, 1986.

A dumping case against Japanese makers of screws has been dropped. The case was originally filed in 1980. The Japanese makers in May 1985 however filed with the court that the case be dropped against them as their market share in the US was dropping anyway, due to increased imports from Korea, Taiwan and China. No one opposed the petition and the case was dropped.

JAPAN LAWLETTER. January 1986. By Roderick Seeman

 

[OnePercenter]

Solyndra was subsidised by the US Government as well. Maybe you failed to realise the millions of dollars wasted on it. It failed simply because the market does not believe solar energy is a viable alternative to oil as of yet. Although the price may of dropped, not enough to stimulate any market demand.

You cannot create phony demand simply by spending money on products or throwing money down a bureaucratic rat hole.

There is a reason why no one needs to subsidise the iPhone. It was produced. People seem to like it. That's it.

If Samsung started giving away their new Galaxy 4's the iPhone WOULD need subsidity. Which makes my point.

Certain providers routinely "give away" a particular phone to get your business, and iPhone hasn't needed subsidizing. Your point just failed.

Not a phone making iPhone users envious.