O'Reilly's Progressive Democrat Dictionary

[Tax Man]

Yet you couldn't articulate what your problem with any part of the post.

One is left to conclude that you are the idiot....

....bet you hear that a lot.

The absurdity of the entire post is so obvious there is no need articulate any part as the whole thing is nescient.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The absurdity of the entire post is so obvious there is no need articulate any part as the whole thing is nescient.

Meaning, it seems.....you can't.


Somehow your sort has been trained to ignore the eye-rolling that follows your every post.


But, on the bright side, you do have that styrofoam cup for when you walk up and down the train every afternoon.
Count your blessings.

 

[White 6]

I would say that you've nailed it in one long sentence. I would only add that the per capita rate of incarceration is the important distinction that negates the large country/ large population factor. But that isn't being argued in any case.

It's indeed all the considerations, wrapped up into one sentence!

Yes, I know and that was the point I made with Chicy.
If you're trying to make some point that she didn't make, what the hell is it?
You're just stepping in the same dog shit she's treading in, and so my same comments apply.

She was not posting on the justice system in particular, but on what Bill O'Reilly describes as his definition of some of the enlightened? words pitched around in the enlightened? society. I read her posts, mostly. We disagree relatively often and occasionally piss each other off. When we don't disagree, I let her know that too.
Treading in the same "dog shit"? Hardly this time or at least up to now. She observes the words used popularly in rhetoric of activism in media and politics. She says she misses Bill on TV and posted one of his articles to highlight another take on these words and phrase. Except for her thread title and the first line used to introduce Bill's post, the rest of the thread post was pure Bill. Sometimes, she tries to force her opinions down people's throats, but to her, this was meant as a "think piece". I used it that way and took it somewhere else. My direction is my own, this time. Not hers, nor Bills. Thank you very much. I don't miss Bill. He can be tiring. She can be tiring. I tire of you fairly quickly also.

 

[Donald H]

She was not posting on the justice system in particular, but on what Bill O'Reilly describes as his definition of some of the enlightened? words pitched around in the enlightened? society. I read her posts, mostly. We disagree relatively often and occasionally piss each other off. When we don't disagree, I let her know that too.
Treading in the same "dog shit"? Hardly this time or at least up to now. She observes the words used popularly in rhetoric of activism in media and politics. She says she misses Bill on TV and posted one of his articles to highlight another take on these words and phrase. Except for her thread title and the first line used to introduce Bill's post, the rest of the thread post was pure Bill. Sometimes, she tries to force her opinions down people's throats, but to her, this was meant as a "think piece". I used it that way and took it somewhere else. My direction is my own, this time. Not hers, nor Bills. Thank you very much. I don't miss Bill. He can be tiring. She can be tiring. I tire of you fairly quickly also.

She got caught with her pants down on the issue I raised with her and so did you. Stop whining about the water under the bridge that you two can't have back.

Make yourself useful and expand the conversation for her. She's too busy trying to turn it into some other topic that can bail her ass out of the facts her and you brought to everybody's attention.

You don't get a free ride with her White, because you're better than that. And you can't help yourself by trying to help her out with her on her bad hair helmet days.

 

[g5000]

I sure miss this guy on TV, but he does post some of his insight.....like this:

"....many Americans still don't understand the progressive language, so I am here to help. That's just the kind of guy I am.

Behold, the lexicon.

Social Justice. The big one. The tent under which most minority grievances are displayed.

Equity. The solution to social injustice. The government and private enterprise favoring minority groups and sometimes women.

Restorative Justice. The movement not to punish criminals with incarceration. This, of course, has led to thousands of murdered Americans, most of them minorities.

Climate Justice. The destruction of the fossil fuel industry and the allocation of massive government funds to support mostly speculative alternative energy plans.

Economic Justice. Guaranteed jobs and salaries.

Income Inequality. Another big progressive tenet. This is the justification for socialism whereby the federal government controls the money flow to Americans - taking from the "haves," giving to the "have nots" with no work requirements or substance testing for the folks receiving other people's money.

Inclusion. Preference for certain social categories, i.e., gay, trans.

Food Insecurity. Free food for the poor.

Housing Insecurity. Free or heavily subsidized shelter for the poor.

Reproductive Rights. Abortion on demand at any time, for any reason, funded with taxpayer dollars. No rights for the unborn or their fathers.

There are other far-left codes, but those are the headlines. Progressives have now reached the apex of their power, with the ill-informed having no idea about what is actually happening."

How to Speak Progressive - Bill's Weekly Column - Bill O'Reilly

If you are bewitched, bothered, or bewildered by how the far left communicates, then this column will be a safe space for you. Way back in 2006, I wrote a book called 'Culture Warrior,' which quickly became a number one bestseller. In that book, I put forth the goals of the progressive movement...

www.billoreilly.com

View attachment 601702

Loofah. A "falafel thing" used to soap a woman's pussy.

 

[White 6]

She got caught with her pants down on the issue I raised with her and so did you. Stop whining about the water under the bridge that you two can't have back.

Make yourself useful and expand the conversation for her. She's too busy trying to turn it into some other topic that can bail her ass out of the facts her and you brought to everybody's attention.

You don't get a free ride with her White, because you're better than that. And you can't help yourself by trying to help her out with her on her bad hair helmet days.

See? There you go, being tiring again.

 

[Donald H]

See? There you go, being tiring again.

even if there are no more than three posters who are intelligent enough to pay attention to White, I have to say that you're one of them.

And even though Chicy is a hardened extremist who is over the top most of the time, she does contribute with material worth rebuttal at least sometimes. Her quoting of Bill on the issue that came back on her ass was a slamdunk.

then you went and made it even worse. At least you don't step in it very often!

 

[Tax Man]

Meaning, it seems.....you can't.


Somehow your sort has been trained to ignore the eye-rolling that follows your every post.


But, on the bright side, you do have that styrofoam cup for when you walk up and down the train every afternoon.
Count your blessings.

YOU are the one who won't! YOU are the one who gets eye rolls for your incompetent ideas.

 

[White 6]

even if there are no more than three posters who are intelligent enough to pay attention to White, I have to say that you're one of them.

And even though Chicy is a hardened extremist who is over the top most of the time, she does contribute with material worth rebuttal at least sometimes. Her quoting of Bill on the issue that came back on her ass was a slamdunk.

then you went and made it even worse. At least you don't step in it very often!

Well, thank you for the kind remark, BUT I haven't stepped in anything today. Certainly not on PolChic's O'Reilly thread. You will know whenever I might, as you won't be the only one that takes issue, and you certainly are this time.
I never really spoke to the point of her post, and frankly surprised she didn't call me on it, as I took it a different direction, something usually frowned on, though she did kick this on out to provoke thought and reaction, not even a partisan attack. As to her thread's real point, I too am not too thrilled with the actual meanings of rhetorical names/phrases used in popular social media, news media and by our political leaders and movements. In many cases disingenuous at best or a complete misstatement of organizational goals and agenda, at worst, such as the innocuous sounding BLM as an organization that supports black lives, when they really just support black thugs, (more often than not), not even weighing in of the issues that are taking and ruining black lives through black on black crime, and gang violence in the underprivileged black neighborhoods. That is just my example, but the thrust of her thread was largely undirected and no attack on anything but hypocrisy we are bombarded with from the left, the right and also people without a consistent message on a daily basis. This was not an example of an extreme post thread, by her or me. If it makes you feel better, she would disagree with you on my intelligence.

 

[Donald H]

Well, thank you for the kind remark, BUT I haven't stepped in anything today. Certainly not on PolChic's O'Reilly thread. You will know whenever I might, as you won't be the only one that takes issue, and you certainly are this time.
I never really spoke to the point of her post, and frankly surprised she didn't call me on it, as I took it a different direction, something usually frowned on, though she did kick this on out to provoke thought and reaction, not even a partisan attack. As to her thread's real point, I too am not too thrilled with the actual meanings of rhetorical names/phrases used in popular social media, news media and by our political leaders and movements. In many cases disingenuous at best or a complete misstatement of organizational goals and agenda, at worst, such as the innocuous sounding BLM as an organization that supports black lives, when they really just support black thugs, (more often than not), not even weighing in of the issues that are taking and ruining black lives through black on black crime, and gang violence in the underprivileged black neighborhoods. That is just my example, but the thrust of her thread was largely undirected and no attack on anything but hypocrisy we are bombarded with from the left, the right and also people without a consistent message on a daily basis. This was not an example of an extreme post thread, by her or me. If it makes you feel better, she would disagree with you on my intelligence.

I didn't accuse anybody of an extreme post. She revealed the sad truth about the fkd up prison system and you seconded it and added a lot more.

She doesn't recognize intelligence in anybody.

 

[Tax Man]

I didn't accuse anybody of an extreme post. She revealed the sad truth about the fkd up prison system and you seconded it and added a lot more.

She doesn't recognize intelligence in anybody.

A true robot

 

[GMCGeneral]

even if there are no more than three posters who are intelligent enough to pay attention to White, I have to say that you're one of them.

And even though Chicy is a hardened extremist who is over the top most of the time, she does contribute with material worth rebuttal at least sometimes. Her quoting of Bill on the issue that came back on her ass was a slamdunk.

then you went and made it even worse. At least you don't step in it very often!

Extremist? Look who's talking Canuck. You and your ilk want to coddle criminals at the expense of their victims and the cops sworn to protect the good and punish evil.