O'Reilly Ratings Soar

Not really. I dont care what some cable pundit says as his opinion wont effect my life in any way.
When the leader of the free world is a pathological liar I take notice for obvious reasons.
ODS symptom: inability to talk about any subject without bringing up Obama.

I'd say lying and obama go together like cookies and milk.
He's stuck on repeat, folks. Somebody get him to the shock therapy room STAT

I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
 
ODS symptom: inability to talk about any subject without bringing up Obama.

I'd say lying and obama go together like cookies and milk.
He's stuck on repeat, folks. Somebody get him to the shock therapy room STAT

I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?
 
So, Fox fans aka conservatives are hypocrites who support liars. No surprises there. NBC did the right thing by suspending Williams; Fox will renew O'Reilly's contract.

That's the difference between a newsreader and an opinionated pundit. A newsreader has to generate confidence in his/her audience to be valuable. A pundit, not so much. That's why no one pays any attention to PMSNBC, for example.
 
I'd say lying and obama go together like cookies and milk.
He's stuck on repeat, folks. Somebody get him to the shock therapy room STAT

I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?

The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
 
Not really. I dont care what some cable pundit says as his opinion wont effect my life in any way.
When the leader of the free world is a pathological liar I take notice for obvious reasons.
ODS symptom: inability to talk about any subject without bringing up Obama.

I'd say lying and obama go together like cookies and milk.
He's stuck on repeat, folks. Somebody get him to the shock therapy room STAT

I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

Or he's ignored, as most conservatives do to him.
 
He's stuck on repeat, folks. Somebody get him to the shock therapy room STAT

I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?

The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
That's funny coming from a guy whose rebuttal amounts to "oh yeah, well Obama did it too"

Sit down, boy. Go watch some Big Brother aka Fox News propaganda and suck your thumb
 
I'd say lying and obama go together like cookies and milk.
He's stuck on repeat, folks. Somebody get him to the shock therapy room STAT

I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?


All they've got is their desperate attempts to derail the thread.

That's easier than facing up to their own hypocrisy and dishonesty.
 
I cant believe that a cable news pundit has this much power over you.
How weak are you?
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?

The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
That's funny coming from a guy whose rebuttal amounts to "oh yeah, well Obama did it too"

Sit down, boy. Go watch some Big Brother aka Fox News propaganda and suck your thumb

And you continue with your childish responses.
That you place more import to a cable TV pundit than you do the president tells me all I need to know about you.
 
Power? :lol:
I'm just enjoying making fun of the hypocritical right, and laughing at your excuses.

"He's not a real news anchor, so his lies don't count. Heck, we expect him to lie to us"

:lmao: good stuff, good stuff indeed :thup:

But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?

The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
That's funny coming from a guy whose rebuttal amounts to "oh yeah, well Obama did it too"

Sit down, boy. Go watch some Big Brother aka Fox News propaganda and suck your thumb

And you continue with your childish responses.
That you place more import to a cable TV pundit than you do the president tells me all I need to know about you.
Waa Waa waaaa
 
But you're just fine with the liar and chief?
You have strange values. Predictable,but strange.
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?

The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
That's funny coming from a guy whose rebuttal amounts to "oh yeah, well Obama did it too"

Sit down, boy. Go watch some Big Brother aka Fox News propaganda and suck your thumb

And you continue with your childish responses.
That you place more import to a cable TV pundit than you do the president tells me all I need to know about you.
Waa Waa waaaa

I seem to remember you asking if I needed a tissue....yet you're the one crying.
 
Speaking of predictable, there you go again with Obama. I guess you're still pretty butthurt over America electing him not once, but twice. Tissue?

The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
That's funny coming from a guy whose rebuttal amounts to "oh yeah, well Obama did it too"

Sit down, boy. Go watch some Big Brother aka Fox News propaganda and suck your thumb

And you continue with your childish responses.
That you place more import to a cable TV pundit than you do the president tells me all I need to know about you.
Waa Waa waaaa

I seem to remember you asking if I needed a tissue....yet you're the one crying.
That was me mocking you, you butthurt little boy
 
The midterms tell me obama and his socialist agenda isn't sitting well with Americans.
You debate like a five year old by the way.
That's funny coming from a guy whose rebuttal amounts to "oh yeah, well Obama did it too"

Sit down, boy. Go watch some Big Brother aka Fox News propaganda and suck your thumb

And you continue with your childish responses.
That you place more import to a cable TV pundit than you do the president tells me all I need to know about you.
Waa Waa waaaa

I seem to remember you asking if I needed a tissue....yet you're the one crying.
That was me mocking you, you butthurt little boy

Shouldnt you be at work?
 
.

So we're pretending there's no difference between and anchor and a pundit, then.

No difference between a guy who's supposed to be a trusted news source and a guy spouting his opinions.

Okay, sure, why not.

.

So we're pretending that O'Lielly doesn't present himself as "your humble news reporter", then.

Okay, sure, why not.

Bill O'Reilley refers to himself as "your humble correspondent" NEVER as a "humble news reporter".
And you and your ilk have the nerve to call him a liar.
Get a grip, learn honesty and stop being a lying Democrat.
 
.

So we're pretending there's no difference between and anchor and a pundit, then.

No difference between a guy who's supposed to be a trusted news source and a guy spouting his opinions.

Okay, sure, why not.

.

So we're pretending that O'Lielly doesn't present himself as "your humble news reporter", then.

Okay, sure, why not.

Bill O'Reilley refers to himself as "your humble correspondent" NEVER as a "humble news reporter".
And you and your ilk have the nerve to call him a liar.
Get a grip, learn honesty and stop being a lying Democrat.
His comment about being a correspondent is a great stretch and exaggeration of the definition of correspondent, if not an outright lie in and of itself. Perhaps you should look up the definitions given for the term.
 
.

So we're pretending there's no difference between and anchor and a pundit, then.

No difference between a guy who's supposed to be a trusted news source and a guy spouting his opinions.

Okay, sure, why not.

.

So we're pretending that O'Lielly doesn't present himself as "your humble news reporter", then.

Okay, sure, why not.

Bill O'Reilley refers to himself as "your humble correspondent" NEVER as a "humble news reporter".
And you and your ilk have the nerve to call him a liar.
Get a grip, learn honesty and stop being a lying Democrat.
His comment about being a correspondent is a great stretch and exaggeration of the definition of correspondent, if not an outright lie in and of itself. Perhaps you should look up the definitions given for the term.

Regardless of what the definition of "correspondent" is, I only attempted to refute the lie that O'Reilley referred to himself as a "news reporter", which he never did.
 
.

So we're pretending there's no difference between and anchor and a pundit, then.

No difference between a guy who's supposed to be a trusted news source and a guy spouting his opinions.

Okay, sure, why not.

.

So we're pretending that O'Lielly doesn't present himself as "your humble news reporter", then.

Okay, sure, why not.

Bill O'Reilley refers to himself as "your humble correspondent" NEVER as a "humble news reporter".
And you and your ilk have the nerve to call him a liar.
Get a grip, learn honesty and stop being a lying Democrat.
His comment about being a correspondent is a great stretch and exaggeration of the definition of correspondent, if not an outright lie in and of itself. Perhaps you should look up the definitions given for the term.

Regardless of what the definition of "correspondent" is, I only attempted to refute the lie that O'Reilley referred to himself as a "news reporter", which he never did.
A correspondent is a "news reporter". He is using a language game of semantics to escape having to admit what he is and convince his fans he is somehow involved with legitimate commentary or news reporting. He is not. He does not follow any standards of professionalism to political commentary or journalism. He is a hack propagandist that uses lies, embellishments, exaggeration and fraud to promote a political agenda that can not be presented in a legitimate way without being mocked and exposed as obvious support and promotion of kleptocacy.
 
LOL Do you left loons ever get tired of things blowing up in your faces?

The Fox News Channel host last night logged his biggest audience of 2015 to date – 3.3 million viewers. He also averaged 590,000 viewers in the news demo. That’s 166% bigger than the crowd he clocked same night last year, and 100% better in the demo viewers.

Bill O Reilly Scores His Best Ratings Of 2015 Deadline

that no doubt makes the CIA happy since he is a one of their plants.
 
.

So we're pretending there's no difference between and anchor and a pundit, then.

No difference between a guy who's supposed to be a trusted news source and a guy spouting his opinions.

Okay, sure, why not.

.

So we're pretending that O'Lielly doesn't present himself as "your humble news reporter", then.

Okay, sure, why not.

Bill O'Reilley refers to himself as "your humble correspondent" NEVER as a "humble news reporter".
And you and your ilk have the nerve to call him a liar.
Get a grip, learn honesty and stop being a lying Democrat.
His comment about being a correspondent is a great stretch and exaggeration of the definition of correspondent, if not an outright lie in and of itself. Perhaps you should look up the definitions given for the term.

Regardless of what the definition of "correspondent" is, I only attempted to refute the lie that O'Reilley referred to himself as a "news reporter", which he never did.
A correspondent is a "news reporter". He is using a language game of semantics to escape having to admit what he is and convince his fans he is somehow involved with legitimate commentary or news reporting. He is not. He does not follow any standards of professionalism to political commentary or journalism. He is a hack propagandist that uses lies, embellishments, exaggeration and fraud to promote a political agenda that can not be presented in a legitimate way without being mocked and exposed as obvious support and promotion of kleptocacy.

you nailed it.:thup::udaman:
 

Forum List

Back
Top