g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 131,614
- 75,690
- 2,605
Don't bother. It sucks.I'd like to see Napoleon on the big screen, but it's also close to three hours
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't bother. It sucks.I'd like to see Napoleon on the big screen, but it's also close to three hours
A good reason for not invading their homeland.It sounds counter-intuitive but the dropping of the 2 atomic bombs saved a huge number of lives.
The US military invasion planners estimated that up to one million American soldiers would become casualties before mainland Japan was finally conquered.
Because every Japanese woman, child, and elderly person, was being trained to attack invading American soldiers with knives, garden tools, and even sharpened sticks. Dying for their emperor was a great honor and untold millions of Japanese citizens were prepared to sacrifice their lives.
You must be frenchA good reason for not invading their homeland.
Surrounding, isolating, and starving an enemy is a time-honored military tactic. We used it in the "island hopping" campaign in the Pacific. We just didn't have the patience to do it to the Japanese mainland.You must be french
NaySurrounding, isolating, and starving an enemy is a time-honored military tactic. We used it in the "island hopping" campaign in the Pacific. We just didn't have the patience to do it to the Japanese mainland.
We bypassed and isolated the islands that weren't needed as staging areas for a future invasion of Japan. We only invaded those we needed. By the time we got to Japan we had overwhelming military superiority in all areas.Nay
We saw how downright crazy fanatical they fought for some of those islands that were nothing more than some rocks and hills. Insanely fought. All the way down to the top commander, the only soldier left, who committed suicide as we approached.
We knew, if they fought that hard and dedicated over a worthless island - they would fight down to the last child over their homeland.
No choice.
The tragedy of the Bomb was that it was unnecessary. Japan was already defeated militarily. Conventional bombing and naval bombardment would have brought them to the deck of the Missouri with minimal risk to our military. The Bomb was dropped to satisfy our vengeance upon an enemy that we did consider less than human.
The starving, demoralized public that had long since grown tired of a war they were obviously going to lose? Predominantly comprised of women, children, and the elderly? It's just about 2024 and you are still swallowing WW2 era propaganda meant for another country's civilian population? Ridiculous.It sounds counter-intuitive but the dropping of the 2 atomic bombs saved a huge number of lives.
The US military invasion planners estimated that up to one million American soldiers would become casualties before mainland Japan was finally conquered.
Because every Japanese woman, child, and elderly person, was being trained to attack invading American soldiers with knives, garden tools, and even sharpened sticks. Dying for their emperor was a great honor and untold millions of Japanese citizens were prepared to sacrifice their lives.
There were still around 3.5 million military personal on the Japanese mainland when the atomic bombs were dropped and ended the war.. Comprised of members of the Navy and Air Force that were integrated into the Army to fight to the death in order to repel the American invaders.The starving, demoralized public that had long since grown tired of a war they were obviously going to lose? Predominantly comprised of women, children, and the elderly? It's just about 2024 and you are still swallowing WW2 era propaganda meant for another country's civilian population? Ridiculous.
Crappy god damned movie review.
For anyone who wanted to watch the new movie about the invention of the nuclear bomb.....I would go ahead and watch this one.
If you want to see a leftist view of the origins of the nuclear arms-race.....then anything they put out that is remotely close to the truth is worth watching. I prefer "Fatman & Littleboy" for entertainment value, even though it's not exactly historically accurate either.
View attachment 866507
I expect this movie to be nominated for awards because it sort of reminded me of Oliver Stone's JFK, only less memorable. There appears to be as much realism and adherence to historical fact as Stone's work. It also could be compared to "There Will Be Blood" which I felt was a horrible movie about the fossil-fuel industry, only slightly more entertaining. With an all-star cast, I think most of them are hoping for best actor awards, and so-on, because of the subject matter contained in this film.
Even though he was a Democrat, the director took a few digs at President Truman, painting him as a mindless bigot who felt that the Japanese weren't exactly human-beings.
If your political leanings are to the left, you might like this move. If you're right of center, you may feel this one spends too much time dwelling on the chaos that might have been behind the scenes in the development of the atomic bomb. It spends too much time hashing out the bigotry that existed in government and not focusing on the actual development of such a weapon. The film went downhill when it goes to black & white after the Trinity test to show the Senate investigations of Oppenheimer and his possible ties to communists, as if they wanted to show the lack of appreciation America had for his contributions to the end of WWII and the defeat of the Japanese.
The big finish was of course the director's view of nukes.....and how they will become the end of planet Earth. Rows of silver missiles jetting into the sky leaving smoke trails and ending in the vaporization of the Earth's atmosphere.
Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft.
I suspect that communists wrote the script just to make America look like garbage.
They were Sharpening Bamboo Sticks and hay rakes , digging out Kitchen knives And forming Civilian Militias , it woulda been a Country full of Dead Enders for sureThere were still around 3.5 million military personal on the Japanese mainland when the atomic bombs were dropped and ended the war.. Comprised of members of the Navy and Air Force that were integrated into the Army to fight to the death in order to repel the American invaders.
Also, there were 10's of millions of Japanese civilian women and elderly men willing to die for their Emperor by killing the invaders any way they could.
How gullible can you be?There were still around 3.5 million military personal on the Japanese mainland when the atomic bombs were dropped and ended the war.. Comprised of members of the Navy and Air Force that were integrated into the Army to fight to the death in order to repel the American invaders.
Also, there were 10's of millions of Japanese civilian women and elderly men willing to die for their Emperor by killing the invaders any way they could.
Propaganda from 80 years ago never intended for you, and you are still lapping it up like milk. What a fool.They were Sharpening Bamboo Sticks and hay rakes , digging out Kitchen knives And forming Civilian Militias , it woulda been a Country full of Dead Enders for sure
We won , get over it .Propaganda from 80 years ago never intended for you, and you are still lapping it up like milk. What a fool.
All in vain if we didn't launch a ground invasion. A protracted siege would have eventually brought a surrender. The bombs actually saved Japanese lives however as a long siege would have killed many more Japanese.There were still around 3.5 million military personal on the Japanese mainland when the atomic bombs were dropped and ended the war.. Comprised of members of the Navy and Air Force that were integrated into the Army to fight to the death in order to repel the American invaders.
Also, there were 10's of millions of Japanese civilian women and elderly men willing to die for their Emperor by killing the invaders any way they could.
Those battles ended the Japanese military extension into the Pacific and put the allies on doorstep of Japan. From those newly acquired air bases we could have bombed Japan into surrendering with minimal loss of life on either side.US casualties battle of Leyte: 16,043 soldiers and 7,270 sailors were killed, 11,991 wounded.
Battle of Guadalcanal: 7,100 dead and almost 8,000 wounded. It took SEVEN MONTHS to capture Guadalcanal.
Battle of Luzon: 10,380 killed and 36,550 wounded.
Battle of Iwo Jima: 6,821 killed and 19,217 wounded
Battle of Okinawa: 12,520 killed and 36,631 wounded.
That's just five battles, almost 60,000 Americans killed and over 100,000 wounded.
That's with conventional bombing and naval bombardment.
The Japanese lost far less lives by being nuked than they would have if they had fought for their mainland with the zeal they fought over a handful of islands. And we would have easily lost another 100,000 American lives.
The Japanese would have lost a million lives if we had not nuked them. We did them a favor.
It could have been a decent movie if they had just told the story straight through. One or two flashbacks can be important to a plot, but they had so much of that that the editing gymnastics destroyed the flow of the whole thing. It was chopped up to the point it became confusing to those who didn't know the history.
For anyone who wanted to watch the new movie about the invention of the nuclear bomb.....I would go ahead and watch this one.
If you want to see a leftist view of the origins of the nuclear arms-race.....then anything they put out that is remotely close to the truth is worth watching. I prefer "Fatman & Littleboy" for entertainment value, even though it's not exactly historically accurate either.
View attachment 866507
I expect this movie to be nominated for awards because it sort of reminded me of Oliver Stone's JFK, only less memorable. There appears to be as much realism and adherence to historical fact as Stone's work. It also could be compared to "There Will Be Blood" which I felt was a horrible movie about the fossil-fuel industry, only slightly more entertaining. With an all-star cast, I think most of them are hoping for best actor awards, and so-on, because of the subject matter contained in this film.
Even though he was a Democrat, the director took a few digs at President Truman, painting him as a mindless bigot who felt that the Japanese weren't exactly human-beings.
If your political leanings are to the left, you might like this move. If you're right of center, you may feel this one spends too much time dwelling on the chaos that might have been behind the scenes in the development of the atomic bomb. It spends too much time hashing out the bigotry that existed in government and not focusing on the actual development of such a weapon. The film went downhill when it goes to black & white after the Trinity test to show the Senate investigations of Oppenheimer and his possible ties to communists, as if they wanted to show the lack of appreciation America had for his contributions to the end of WWII and the defeat of the Japanese.
The big finish was of course the director's view of nukes.....and how they will become the end of planet Earth. Rows of silver missiles jetting into the sky leaving smoke trails and ending in the vaporization of the Earth's atmosphere.
Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft.
I suspect that communists wrote the script just to make America look like garbage.