Opinions differ after briefing on boat bombing.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,262
Reaction score
27,119
Points
2,820
R's are circling the wagons.

Top military officers show lawmakers video of the Sept. 2 boat attack.

Top military officers showed senior members of Congress a video of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat suspected of carrying drugs, including a follow-up strike that has been at the center of a growing debate over the Trump administration’s lethal mission.

But Republicans and Democrats left the closed-door meetings drawing starkly different conclusions after watching the unedited video of the initial strike on the boat on Sept. 2 and the follow-up that killed the survivors and sank the boat.

Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called the attack “highly lawful and lethal.” He said the video showed two survivors trying to flip a boat “loaded with drugs bound for the United States.” The follow-up missiles were “exactly what we’d expect our military commanders to do,” Mr. Cotton added.

Representative Rick Crawford, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said there was “no doubt” in his mind that the Defense Department was carrying out the strikes in a “highly professional manner.”

But Democrats exited the briefings even more concerned about the campaign against drug smugglers that to date has included strikes on 21 vessels in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean that have killed 83 people.

Representative Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee who for years has been read in on sensitive counterterrorism and covert operations, told reporters that the Sept. 2 attack video was “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“You have two individuals in clear distress without any means of locomotion with a destroyed vessel who were killed by the United States,” he said.


Imagine my surprise that R's and D's can look at the same video and reach different conclusions. It's a metaphor for the times we live in. Facts can not be agreed upon.
 
Last edited:
Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called the attack “highly lawful and lethal.” He said the video showed two survivors trying to flip a boat “loaded with drugs bound for the United States.” The follow-up missiles were “exactly what we’d expect our military commanders to do,” Mr. Cotton added.
What the **** kind of boat was it, a damn kayak?
 
hawkins and crawford were in the military....himes was not.....that could be why they looked at it differently...
 
Defenseless human beings or narco terrorists drug dealers killing Americans. Democrats redefine reality
How much fentanyl do you think comes from Venezuela? The state department says none.
https//venezuela-and-fentanyl-dismantling-the-us-narrative-with-data-from-the-us-government%2F&guccounter=1
 
R's are circling the wagons.

Top military officers show lawmakers video of the Sept. 2 boat attack.

Top military officers showed senior members of Congress a video of a Sept. 2 attack on a boat suspected of carrying drugs, including a follow-up strike that has been at the center of a growing debate over the Trump administration’s lethal mission.

But Republicans and Democrats left the closed-door meetings drawing starkly different conclusions after watching the unedited video of the initial strike on the boat on Sept. 2 and the follow-up that killed the survivors and sank the boat.

Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called the attack “highly lawful and lethal.” He said the video showed two survivors trying to flip a boat “loaded with drugs bound for the United States.” The follow-up missiles were “exactly what we’d expect our military commanders to do,” Mr. Cotton added.

Representative Rick Crawford, Republican of Arkansas and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said there was “no doubt” in his mind that the Defense Department was carrying out the strikes in a “highly professional manner.”

But Democrats exited the briefings even more concerned about the campaign against drug smugglers that to date has included strikes on 21 vessels in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean that have killed 83 people.

Representative Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee who for years has been read in on sensitive counterterrorism and covert operations, told reporters that the Sept. 2 attack video was “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“You have two individuals in clear distress without any means of locomotion with a destroyed vessel who were killed by the United States,” he said.


Imagine my surprise that R's and D's can look at the same video and reach different conclusions. It's a metaphor for the times we live in. Facts can not be agreed upon.
Obama killed THOUSANDS of innocent civilians during his 8 year drone strike rampage. He killed a 16 year old American citizen without any trial. Obama bombed a ******* wedding for crying out loud! :laugh:

Do you honestly think that ANYONE is going to get in trouble over killing some drug dealers who have been designated as terrorists? :dunno:
 
If what Cotton said is true then US law allows for the extra judicial killing of defenseless human beings.
I mean, thats every single drone strike ever. We kill dudes in their in their beds as they sleep. We kill them as they are casually driving around town. We bring silent death from the sky to anyone we dont like. The US has done this for our entire lifetimes. :dunno:
 
Anyone have an opinion as to whether the guy who was made Sec. of D despite a lack of qualifications, who is a recovering (hopefully) alcoholic, who paid $50K to settle an accusation of sexual assault, who was found to have put our troops in harm's way by the acting IG at the Pentagon, survives this?
 
Obama killed THOUSANDS of innocent civilians during his 8 year drone strike rampage. He killed a 16 year old American citizen without any trial. Obama bombed a ******* wedding for crying out loud! :laugh:

Do you honestly think that ANYONE is going to get in trouble over killing some drug dealers who have been designated as terrorists? :dunno:
Sorry, your whataboutisms fall on deaf ears. See post #14.
 
Sorry, your whataboutisms fall on deaf ears. See post #14.
Its not "whataboutism", its a clear example that demonstrates that there wont be anyone who gets in trouble for killing drug terrorists. Its been proven many many times over that the military can kill whomever they want, even civilians.
 
15th post
Its not "whataboutism", its a clear example that demonstrates that there wont be anyone who gets in trouble for killing drug terrorists. Its been proven many many times over that the military can kill whomever they want, even civilians.
I wonder how many R's are thinking to themselves, "I should have questioned more loudly Hegseth's ability to do his job back when he potentially put US troops at risk out of sheer idiocy and a lack of experience."
 
Its not "whataboutism", its a clear example that demonstrates that there wont be anyone who gets in trouble for killing drug terrorists. Its been proven many many times over that the military can kill whomever they want, even civilians.
If that is going to be Pete's defense he is exposing himself to serious legal and occupational consequences.
 
I wonder how many R's are thinking to themselves, "I should have questioned more loudly Hegseth's ability to do his job back when he potentially put US troops at risk out of sheer idiocy and a lack of experience."
How does killing terrorist drug dealers with drone strikes put our soldiers at risk? Nah, Pete is doing an awesome job. What the **** more could I ask for from him? :dunno:
 
If that is going to be Pete's defense he is exposing himself to serious legal and occupational consequences.
Bro, wake up. Because of Biden's blanket pardons AND the 4 years of lawfare against Trump, EVERY single president from now on will pardon EVERYONE in his cabinet. Blanket pardons for all. Thanks for that shit by the way. I do not like this new system of blanket pardons, but who is going to subject themselves to democrat lawfare after what Trump went through? No one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom