Open to Judgement: UN complicity in 7th Oct. massacre

You miss the point entirely. Europeans settling the least desireable Europeans in Palestine, because they can, and because the Jews weren't keen on settling in Uganda, which was the first proposal.

Why, I closely examine "Free Palestine" swift change of goalposts in the narrative about an alleged "genocide" being the crime, as the judgement turns out to be against the "white race", but then the "crime" is also projected selectively at Jews.

All you do is throw dirt because you can't
even pinpoint exactly the accusation.

Make this make sense.
 
Last edited:
What UNRWA teachers say, when You're not listening



 
Why, I closely examine "Free Palestine" swift change of goalposts in the narrative about an alleged "genocide" being the crime, as the judgement turns out to be against the "white race", but then the "crime" is also projected selectively at Jews.

Because the Jews are the only white people who seem to think this kind of behavior is still okay. All the others gave up their colonial empires and passed laws to give people of color equal rights.

The only reason why the Zionists are allowed to still get away with this shit is because the world had a Sad because Hitler was a meany-head. But that is getting a little worn and tired.
 
Because the Jews are the only white people who seem to think this kind of behavior is still okay. All the others gave up their colonial empires and passed laws to give people of color equal rights.

The only reason why the Zionists are allowed to still get away with this shit is because the world had a Sad because Hitler was a meany-head. But that is getting a little worn and tired.

So the ultimate crime projected at Jews is "being white",
despite coming from the same supposed "Arab" states.

But are the Arab imperialists "being black" when
practicing slavery TODAY, or just hypocrites?

slavery.png

 
Last edited:
What was the Muslim excuse for violence before that?

The violence was always caused by the illegal Zionist immigrants.
They were the only ones armed.
The Arabs had never been allowed arms by the Ottoman Empire or the British.
The US smuggled billions worth of US surplus armed to the Zionists, and they committed all the crimes.
 
Why, I closely examine "Free Palestine" swift change of goalposts in the narrative about an alleged "genocide" being the crime, as the judgement turns out to be against the "white race", but then the "crime" is also projected selectively at Jews.

All you do is throw dirt because you can't
even pinpoint exactly the accusation.

Make this make sense.

While the US and Europeans were also guilty by supporting and arming the Zionists, it was the Zionists who planted the bombs and pulled the trigger to murder innocent women and children, like in Deir Yassin.

And its easy to pinpoint.
Menachim Begin admitted to being the one who planted the bombs to murder the British peace-keepers by blowing up the King David Hotel. And all Israelis then are complicit by making him Prime Minister later.
 
So the ultimate crime projected at Jews is "being white",
despite coming from the same supposed "Arab" states.

But are the Arab imperialists "being black" when
practicing slavery TODAY, or just hypocrites?

slavery.png



That is a lie.
There are no modern slaves, because it is no longer economically practical.
That is why most countries stopped slavery in the early 1800s, it was not practical and cost more than other means of employment.
 
The UN has the blood of both Israelis and Gazans on its hands

For years the UN, and its agencies, UNRWA, UN Women, UNHRC, UNICEF have served as the arms and mouthpiece of the worst human rights abusers, totalitarian regimes the likes of Hamas, Iran, Qatar and China - giving them the main seats governing its Human Rights Council.

The outcome - abuse of power by drawing unproportionate attention to the Arab-Israeli conflict
to cover up for the catastrophic violations and human rights abuse, committed by the
participants of the UN forum, in the many wars currently around the globe.

Exhibit #1 -




UN direct involvement with Hamas - jobs and official positions

This, of course, serves not only the totalitarian states, but the UN itself,
with evidence of direct involvement with Hamas in the 7th October massacre,
and previous decades of corruption schemes to funnel aid from refugees through UNRWA,
to oligarchs like Arafat, Haniyeh and other violations of intl. law piling up- committed by the UN.

Exhibit #2 -



Exhibit #3 -


Exhibit #4 -




Who is the accuser?

Under former President Mbeki, South Africa provoked international dismay and criticism when it tried to block United Nations censure of Burma, Sudan, and Zimbabwe for gross human rights abuses. In the case of Sudan, Pretoria stood accused of turning a blind eye to Khartoum's excessive and indiscriminate violence in Darfur, betraying South Africa's own struggle for democracy and commitment to promoting human rights.

Exhibit #5 -


Exhibit #6 -


Exhibit #7 -



On proportionality, double standards and modern day bloodlibels

If the absurdity of the disproportionality argument, recited at the UN forums by it members, mainly to condemn Israel, wasn't apparent enough, the double standards and disproprtionality of the argument itself is evidently demonstrated by the hostility of its members, and number of resolutions, mainly against Israel, a minority.

For the last 7 decades, the Arab-Israeli conflict has been the cause of fewer casualties than any other relatively short-term conflicts occurring in the region, then and now - by far.

Yet, the international community wants to judge Israel for genocide.

However, when the UN stage is given to mockery of genocide, the result is devaluing of human life. And the implications are not only for Israel, but everyone else,
especially nation states and minorities.

Only a year ago UN "Special Rapporteur", Francesca Albanese used her position,
to accuse Israel of no less than 420,000, a totally made up number of casualties,
she "confirmed", and it wasn't severe enough for the Hague or the news.

Today, the Hague is judging Israel for an alleged genocide,
referring to 20,000 casualties, reported by Hamas.

Exhibit #8 -

F1ReMRSWYAAR2U5



Constructive Vision and Optimism

Optimism is a typically Jewish ailment, not as a last resort, but out of knowledge and experience,
that every fruit has a peel that first draws the eye, which guards the main edible part inside.
The principle of reciprocity, or more precisely 'measure against measure' draws a greater
measure of judgement against the enemies of Israel. History will witness, and You
don't have to be a believer to see that. With that said - let the show go on.

Now, what fruit, what constructive vision and what optimism?

Rabbi Calfon Mosheh HaCohen, who lived during the days of Dr. Herzl, spoke in detail, about the establishment of an international organization professing for world peace, similar to the UN,
with the court and the authority to settle global disputes, as envisioned
by the Hebrew prophets - in Jerusalem.

The decline of the UN and the establishment of the International Court of Jerusalem (CIJ), are one process, that now sounds as far, as during the days of the Ottoman Caliphate
was professing the re-constitution, of a striving Jewish state.

"And saviors shall ascend Mt. Zion, to judge (also) Mt. Esau,
and to HaShem shall be the kingdom"

- Prophet 'Ovadyah

WTF is up with the data dump? The only one making human rights violations are the Israelis. Fuck Israel!
 
What was the Muslim excuse for violence before that?

How about the fact the European Jews agree to the 30,000 a year quota and instead smuggled in over 300,000 a year?
Or how about Menachim Begin killing the British peace-keepers by blowing up the King David hotel, so he could have Irgun start wiping out hundreds of Arab villages like Deir Yassin?
 

Forum List

Back
Top