Trump "Only in America"

It has become quite a common occurrence on this forum for posters to start threads based on what is obvious lies...and many times with misleading or lying titles. Two were started today. Stein DIDN'T miss the deadline to file... yet Trump supporters flocked to the thread like flies to shit to praise the OP and trash Stein. Another OP started a thread that a Somali refugee killed people at Ohio State with a gun. Not only did the refugee NOT use a gun, he didn't kill a single person, not even a critically injured person. And people are giving Trump credit for the refugee getting shot and killed... when Obama is President still! Yet if you say something about Trump that is negative, they will quickly point out that Trump isn't President yet.

So, my question is... is there some kind of rule around here about creating threads that are complete lies and using misleading and lying thread titles? Especially in regular parts of the forum?

Oldstyle, yes Hillary was vetted like no one I have ever seen. By congress and quite a bit by the hacks that Assange (thanks to that specific foreign entity). Funny how Clinton, the DNC, plus others were hacked. The think
g that causes me concern is that the GOP/Trump; were left alone. I fimd that seriously concerning.
Do I have a problem with Clinton/DNC getting hacked? Actually, no. I never had any intention of ever voting for Clinton. I voted third party, again (McMullin). I have never liked the Clintons and have never voted for the Clintons.
The rightwing hated media. Well, they sure covered Clinon's woes. And it's a fact that Trump got a ton of media, both good and bad. Trump got far more attention (as noted by you) than the other GOP candidates during the primary season. Why? Trump is excellent at getting media attention, that's how and why he won the GOP nomination. He played the press. Trump has said more than once, as long as he is dominating the media, good or bad, he is happy.
Being quite the salesman, he sold the public that the media was rigged, the election was rigged, Cruz's dad was involved in killing JFK; etc. Trump, by far, was the world's best know billionaire even before the election. All because he is an expert t manipulating the press.
Thanks to that skill, America elected the most unqualified president in it's history. It's a marketing wonder.
The election was rigged. Bernie was just there for show. The msm was very much on Hillary's side and did everything they could to take Trump out. If he used them in any way who's fault is it?

And it wasn't the "right wing hate media" that payed protesters to cause problems at Trump rallies or prevented people from attending Hillary's. You saw nothing but what you wanted to because hate blinded your eyes.

"Hate" is a pretty strong word.
"Disprove of" would be more accurate.
I looked at both party's negatively, which my posts directed at either clearly displayed. I believe you would find me stating often, that both candidates were very bad choices. What has you all excited is that I deem Trump to be the worse ever, followed closely by Clinton. That is my opinion which wasn't dictated by the media. It was dictated by their actions and lack of total trustworthiness. Being as I'm basically not a narrow minded ideologue, I can be much more objective than a willing and dedicated follower of a given ideology.
Just remember, if feminism goes unchecked, it's worse for everyone, progressively.

Well that depends on your definitions of "feminism," "progressively" and "everyone".
When you typed your statement, were the veins in your neck bulging or were to leaning back in your chair, typing with one hand while scratching your nuts with the other hand?
Look, not everyone's racial supremacy goes hand in hand with feminism, and one day, neither will yours.

Are you a soothsayer?
 

Another liberal who can't come to terms with the American people turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and what's left of the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party?

Say what you will about Trump, Lew...Clinton was STILL a worse choice! I know you don't want to admit that...but it's true. You folks ran probably the only candidate who Trump COULD have beaten...and what's laughable is that you fixed the process so that she had no competition from the Democratic side to make it all possible!

It wasn't my candidate... and as I have said, The republican party didn't have to elect Trump in the primaries, they could have actually chosen a REAL candidate like Kasich, Cruz, Rubio, or Bush.

I'm afraid you're going to have to blame that on you liberals as well, Lew. Do you remember Jeb Bush complaining that the main stream media was only covering Donald Trump and basically ignoring everyone else? Be honest...news outlets like CNN pushed Trump in the GOP race and kept the focus on him because they thought he'd be easy for Clinton to beat! Kasich, Cruz, Rubio & Bush got no coverage and it wasn't something that just happened. The liberal main stream media tried everything they could to fix this race for Clinton...right down to rigging the GOP race. The toughest network on Trump before he got the nomination was FOX. Funny how that all changed once he and Clinton were the two nominees! Then CNN and the rest went after Trump with every negative thing they could come up with. You want to assign blame for a Trump Presidency? Start by pointing fingers squarely at CNN and the rest. They gave you this Presidency. They were too arrogant to see it coming.


Why do I have to blame Republicans voting a lying fraud candidate in the primaries on Liberals?
Because open primary results showed that Trump was getting votes from Democrats?

Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
 
Another liberal who can't come to terms with the American people turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and what's left of the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party?

Say what you will about Trump, Lew...Clinton was STILL a worse choice! I know you don't want to admit that...but it's true. You folks ran probably the only candidate who Trump COULD have beaten...and what's laughable is that you fixed the process so that she had no competition from the Democratic side to make it all possible!

It wasn't my candidate... and as I have said, The republican party didn't have to elect Trump in the primaries, they could have actually chosen a REAL candidate like Kasich, Cruz, Rubio, or Bush.

I'm afraid you're going to have to blame that on you liberals as well, Lew. Do you remember Jeb Bush complaining that the main stream media was only covering Donald Trump and basically ignoring everyone else? Be honest...news outlets like CNN pushed Trump in the GOP race and kept the focus on him because they thought he'd be easy for Clinton to beat! Kasich, Cruz, Rubio & Bush got no coverage and it wasn't something that just happened. The liberal main stream media tried everything they could to fix this race for Clinton...right down to rigging the GOP race. The toughest network on Trump before he got the nomination was FOX. Funny how that all changed once he and Clinton were the two nominees! Then CNN and the rest went after Trump with every negative thing they could come up with. You want to assign blame for a Trump Presidency? Start by pointing fingers squarely at CNN and the rest. They gave you this Presidency. They were too arrogant to see it coming.


Why do I have to blame Republicans voting a lying fraud candidate in the primaries on Liberals?
Because open primary results showed that Trump was getting votes from Democrats?

Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.
 
It has become quite a common occurrence on this forum for posters to start threads based on what is obvious lies...and many times with misleading or lying titles. Two were started today. Stein DIDN'T miss the deadline to file... yet Trump supporters flocked to the thread like flies to shit to praise the OP and trash Stein. Another OP started a thread that a Somali refugee killed people at Ohio State with a gun. Not only did the refugee NOT use a gun, he didn't kill a single person, not even a critically injured person. And people are giving Trump credit for the refugee getting shot and killed... when Obama is President still! Yet if you say something about Trump that is negative, they will quickly point out that Trump isn't President yet.

So, my question is... is there some kind of rule around here about creating threads that are complete lies and using misleading and lying thread titles? Especially in regular parts of the forum?

The election was rigged. Bernie was just there for show. The msm was very much on Hillary's side and did everything they could to take Trump out. If he used them in any way who's fault is it?

And it wasn't the "right wing hate media" that payed protesters to cause problems at Trump rallies or prevented people from attending Hillary's. You saw nothing but what you wanted to because hate blinded your eyes.

"Hate" is a pretty strong word.
"Disprove of" would be more accurate.
I looked at both party's negatively, which my posts directed at either clearly displayed. I believe you would find me stating often, that both candidates were very bad choices. What has you all excited is that I deem Trump to be the worse ever, followed closely by Clinton. That is my opinion which wasn't dictated by the media. It was dictated by their actions and lack of total trustworthiness. Being as I'm basically not a narrow minded ideologue, I can be much more objective than a willing and dedicated follower of a given ideology.
Just remember, if feminism goes unchecked, it's worse for everyone, progressively.

Well that depends on your definitions of "feminism," "progressively" and "everyone".
When you typed your statement, were the veins in your neck bulging or were to leaning back in your chair, typing with one hand while scratching your nuts with the other hand?
Look, not everyone's racial supremacy goes hand in hand with feminism, and one day, neither will yours.

Are you a soothsayer?
I'm living your future.
 
It wasn't my candidate... and as I have said, The republican party didn't have to elect Trump in the primaries, they could have actually chosen a REAL candidate like Kasich, Cruz, Rubio, or Bush.

I'm afraid you're going to have to blame that on you liberals as well, Lew. Do you remember Jeb Bush complaining that the main stream media was only covering Donald Trump and basically ignoring everyone else? Be honest...news outlets like CNN pushed Trump in the GOP race and kept the focus on him because they thought he'd be easy for Clinton to beat! Kasich, Cruz, Rubio & Bush got no coverage and it wasn't something that just happened. The liberal main stream media tried everything they could to fix this race for Clinton...right down to rigging the GOP race. The toughest network on Trump before he got the nomination was FOX. Funny how that all changed once he and Clinton were the two nominees! Then CNN and the rest went after Trump with every negative thing they could come up with. You want to assign blame for a Trump Presidency? Start by pointing fingers squarely at CNN and the rest. They gave you this Presidency. They were too arrogant to see it coming.


Why do I have to blame Republicans voting a lying fraud candidate in the primaries on Liberals?
Because open primary results showed that Trump was getting votes from Democrats?

Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.


Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
 
I'm afraid you're going to have to blame that on you liberals as well, Lew. Do you remember Jeb Bush complaining that the main stream media was only covering Donald Trump and basically ignoring everyone else? Be honest...news outlets like CNN pushed Trump in the GOP race and kept the focus on him because they thought he'd be easy for Clinton to beat! Kasich, Cruz, Rubio & Bush got no coverage and it wasn't something that just happened. The liberal main stream media tried everything they could to fix this race for Clinton...right down to rigging the GOP race. The toughest network on Trump before he got the nomination was FOX. Funny how that all changed once he and Clinton were the two nominees! Then CNN and the rest went after Trump with every negative thing they could come up with. You want to assign blame for a Trump Presidency? Start by pointing fingers squarely at CNN and the rest. They gave you this Presidency. They were too arrogant to see it coming.


Why do I have to blame Republicans voting a lying fraud candidate in the primaries on Liberals?
Because open primary results showed that Trump was getting votes from Democrats?

Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.


Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~
 
Why do I have to blame Republicans voting a lying fraud candidate in the primaries on Liberals?
Because open primary results showed that Trump was getting votes from Democrats?

Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.


Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
 
Because open primary results showed that Trump was getting votes from Democrats?

Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.


Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
Ohohoho, not your admission, your claim that only registered Republicans can vote in Republican primaries.
 
Unless something has changed, only registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary deary.
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.


Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
Ohohoho, not your admission, your claim that only registered Republicans can vote in Republican primaries.

And? I admitted I was wrong? What's your point? It's one of those things you learn as you get older... not everything is a competition. Sometimes you have to admit when you are wrong. I was wrong. Congrats. Live it up.
 
... Pffft hahahaha. Oh, good grief. If you being a Socialist wasn't enough reason to treat you like a joke, this post is. You, sir, just won the "Fopdoodle of the Year" award.

Primary election - Wikipedia

Have fun, take breaks between words so you don't hurt yourself.


Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
Ohohoho, not your admission, your claim that only registered Republicans can vote in Republican primaries.

And? I admitted I was wrong? What's your point? It's one of those things you learn as you get older... not everything is a competition. Sometimes you have to admit when you are wrong. I was wrong. Congrats. Live it up.
Yes, you were wrong about something that's borderline common knowledge. I've never lived in an open primary state, I've never even voted, I'm not old enough to vote, and I knew this. Teehee~
 
Yep...11 out of the 50 states allows it. I've never lived in a state that allowed it. I was wrong, and you were right, I guess there is a first for everything.
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
Ohohoho, not your admission, your claim that only registered Republicans can vote in Republican primaries.

And? I admitted I was wrong? What's your point? It's one of those things you learn as you get older... not everything is a competition. Sometimes you have to admit when you are wrong. I was wrong. Congrats. Live it up.
Yes, you were wrong about something that's borderline common knowledge. I've never lived in an open primary state, I've never even voted, I'm not old enough to vote, and I knew this. Teehee~


You know if I was a Trump supporter, instead of just admitting I was wrong, I would have said something about you using Wikipedia as a source. You know Wikipedia can be edited by anyone? In my college classes we aren't allowed to use it as a source. But I'm not going to be like that. I was wrong. End of story. Throw yourself a party. Congrats.
 
Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
Ohohoho, not your admission, your claim that only registered Republicans can vote in Republican primaries.

And? I admitted I was wrong? What's your point? It's one of those things you learn as you get older... not everything is a competition. Sometimes you have to admit when you are wrong. I was wrong. Congrats. Live it up.
Yes, you were wrong about something that's borderline common knowledge. I've never lived in an open primary state, I've never even voted, I'm not old enough to vote, and I knew this. Teehee~


You know if I was a Trump supporter, instead of just admitting I was wrong, I would have said something about you using Wikipedia as a source. You know Wikipedia can be edited by anyone? In my college classes we aren't allowed to use it as a source. But I'm not going to be like that. I was wrong. End of story. Throw yourself a party. Congrats.
And yet you chose to complain about it, anyway. Good grief, you act half my age.
 

Another liberal who can't come to terms with the American people turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and what's left of the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party?

Say what you will about Trump, Lew...Clinton was STILL a worse choice! I know you don't want to admit that...but it's true. You folks ran probably the only candidate who Trump COULD have beaten...and what's laughable is that you fixed the process so that she had no competition from the Democratic side to make it all possible!

Were all the Republicans worse choices?

Than Hillary? I can't think of a more flawed candidate in my lifetime, Fridgid. Hillary Clinton had so much "baggage" coming along with her during this campaign it's a miracle her plane was even able to get off the ground!

The point being that Trump beat all the Republicans. Hillary might have been flawed, I mean, who isn't flawed? but to say Trump beat Hillary simply because she was flawed, doesn't explain why Trump beat every Republican candidate.
Because he had 24/7 media coverage and Democrat voters. Liberals consistently ignore that.

Do you think it would be possible to write a single post without shouting out "Liberals blah blah blah"? It's fucking ridiculous.
 
Another liberal who can't come to terms with the American people turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and what's left of the Progressive wing of the Democratic Party?

Say what you will about Trump, Lew...Clinton was STILL a worse choice! I know you don't want to admit that...but it's true. You folks ran probably the only candidate who Trump COULD have beaten...and what's laughable is that you fixed the process so that she had no competition from the Democratic side to make it all possible!

Were all the Republicans worse choices?

Than Hillary? I can't think of a more flawed candidate in my lifetime, Fridgid. Hillary Clinton had so much "baggage" coming along with her during this campaign it's a miracle her plane was even able to get off the ground!

The point being that Trump beat all the Republicans. Hillary might have been flawed, I mean, who isn't flawed? but to say Trump beat Hillary simply because she was flawed, doesn't explain why Trump beat every Republican candidate.
Because he had 24/7 media coverage and Democrat voters. Liberals consistently ignore that.

Do you think it would be possible to write a single post without shouting out "Liberals blah blah blah"? It's fucking ridiculous.
I do, just not often~
 
It has become quite a common occurrence on this forum for posters to start threads based on what is obvious lies...and many times with misleading or lying titles. Two were started today. Stein DIDN'T miss the deadline to file... yet Trump supporters flocked to the thread like flies to shit to praise the OP and trash Stein. Another OP started a thread that a Somali refugee killed people at Ohio State with a gun. Not only did the refugee NOT use a gun, he didn't kill a single person, not even a critically injured person. And people are giving Trump credit for the refugee getting shot and killed... when Obama is President still! Yet if you say something about Trump that is negative, they will quickly point out that Trump isn't President yet.

So, my question is... is there some kind of rule around here about creating threads that are complete lies and using misleading and lying thread titles? Especially in regular parts of the forum?

"Hate" is a pretty strong word.
"Disprove of" would be more accurate.
I looked at both party's negatively, which my posts directed at either clearly displayed. I believe you would find me stating often, that both candidates were very bad choices. What has you all excited is that I deem Trump to be the worse ever, followed closely by Clinton. That is my opinion which wasn't dictated by the media. It was dictated by their actions and lack of total trustworthiness. Being as I'm basically not a narrow minded ideologue, I can be much more objective than a willing and dedicated follower of a given ideology.
Just remember, if feminism goes unchecked, it's worse for everyone, progressively.

Well that depends on your definitions of "feminism," "progressively" and "everyone".
When you typed your statement, were the veins in your neck bulging or were to leaning back in your chair, typing with one hand while scratching your nuts with the other hand?
Look, not everyone's racial supremacy goes hand in hand with feminism, and one day, neither will yours.

Are you a soothsayer?
I'm living your future.
download.jpg
Well, if you have half the fun I have had so far,,enjoy.
 
It has become quite a common occurrence on this forum for posters to start threads based on what is obvious lies...and many times with misleading or lying titles. Two were started today. Stein DIDN'T miss the deadline to file... yet Trump supporters flocked to the thread like flies to shit to praise the OP and trash Stein. Another OP started a thread that a Somali refugee killed people at Ohio State with a gun. Not only did the refugee NOT use a gun, he didn't kill a single person, not even a critically injured person. And people are giving Trump credit for the refugee getting shot and killed... when Obama is President still! Yet if you say something about Trump that is negative, they will quickly point out that Trump isn't President yet.

So, my question is... is there some kind of rule around here about creating threads that are complete lies and using misleading and lying thread titles? Especially in regular parts of the forum?

Just remember, if feminism goes unchecked, it's worse for everyone, progressively.

Well that depends on your definitions of "feminism," "progressively" and "everyone".
When you typed your statement, were the veins in your neck bulging or were to leaning back in your chair, typing with one hand while scratching your nuts with the other hand?
Look, not everyone's racial supremacy goes hand in hand with feminism, and one day, neither will yours.

Are you a soothsayer?
I'm living your future.
View attachment 100264
Well, if you have half the fun I have had so far,,enjoy.
Well, have fun doubling up feminism with your NZ Nazism.
 
Were all the Republicans worse choices?

Than Hillary? I can't think of a more flawed candidate in my lifetime, Fridgid. Hillary Clinton had so much "baggage" coming along with her during this campaign it's a miracle her plane was even able to get off the ground!

The point being that Trump beat all the Republicans. Hillary might have been flawed, I mean, who isn't flawed? but to say Trump beat Hillary simply because she was flawed, doesn't explain why Trump beat every Republican candidate.
Because he had 24/7 media coverage and Democrat voters. Liberals consistently ignore that.

Do you think it would be possible to write a single post without shouting out "Liberals blah blah blah"? It's fucking ridiculous.
I do, just not often~

Well, you know, you come on a political forum, it might be an idea to talk about politics, rather than play petty games.
 
Than Hillary? I can't think of a more flawed candidate in my lifetime, Fridgid. Hillary Clinton had so much "baggage" coming along with her during this campaign it's a miracle her plane was even able to get off the ground!

The point being that Trump beat all the Republicans. Hillary might have been flawed, I mean, who isn't flawed? but to say Trump beat Hillary simply because she was flawed, doesn't explain why Trump beat every Republican candidate.
Because he had 24/7 media coverage and Democrat voters. Liberals consistently ignore that.

Do you think it would be possible to write a single post without shouting out "Liberals blah blah blah"? It's fucking ridiculous.
I do, just not often~

Well, you know, you come on a political forum, it might be an idea to talk about politics, rather than play petty games.
I did, you just ignored that to complain.
 
The point being that Trump beat all the Republicans. Hillary might have been flawed, I mean, who isn't flawed? but to say Trump beat Hillary simply because she was flawed, doesn't explain why Trump beat every Republican candidate.
Because he had 24/7 media coverage and Democrat voters. Liberals consistently ignore that.

Do you think it would be possible to write a single post without shouting out "Liberals blah blah blah"? It's fucking ridiculous.
I do, just not often~

Well, you know, you come on a political forum, it might be an idea to talk about politics, rather than play petty games.
I did, you just ignored that to complain.

Oh please, I'm right roughly 80% of the time. Remember the feeling of being wrong. You should also thank me for being such a lovely, beautiful, kind-hearted person, that I won't quote that in my signature.

I will, however, share it with all of my friends~

You won't quote it in your signature? I don't care. I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't happen often, but I can do it. That's not something a person should be ashamed to do. It shows character.
Ohohoho, not your admission, your claim that only registered Republicans can vote in Republican primaries.

And? I admitted I was wrong? What's your point? It's one of those things you learn as you get older... not everything is a competition. Sometimes you have to admit when you are wrong. I was wrong. Congrats. Live it up.
Yes, you were wrong about something that's borderline common knowledge. I've never lived in an open primary state, I've never even voted, I'm not old enough to vote, and I knew this. Teehee~


You know if I was a Trump supporter, instead of just admitting I was wrong, I would have said something about you using Wikipedia as a source. You know Wikipedia can be edited by anyone? In my college classes we aren't allowed to use it as a source. But I'm not going to be like that. I was wrong. End of story. Throw yourself a party. Congrats.

A lot of the information is referenced. That is what the little numbers in parentheses mean. You can easily check the references of any wiki document.
 
It has become quite a common occurrence on this forum for posters to start threads based on what is obvious lies...and many times with misleading or lying titles. Two were started today. Stein DIDN'T miss the deadline to file... yet Trump supporters flocked to the thread like flies to shit to praise the OP and trash Stein. Another OP started a thread that a Somali refugee killed people at Ohio State with a gun. Not only did the refugee NOT use a gun, he didn't kill a single person, not even a critically injured person. And people are giving Trump credit for the refugee getting shot and killed... when Obama is President still! Yet if you say something about Trump that is negative, they will quickly point out that Trump isn't President yet.

So, my question is... is there some kind of rule around here about creating threads that are complete lies and using misleading and lying thread titles? Especially in regular parts of the forum?

Well that depends on your definitions of "feminism," "progressively" and "everyone".
When you typed your statement, were the veins in your neck bulging or were to leaning back in your chair, typing with one hand while scratching your nuts with the other hand?
Look, not everyone's racial supremacy goes hand in hand with feminism, and one day, neither will yours.

Are you a soothsayer?
I'm living your future.
View attachment 100264
Well, if you have half the fun I have had so far,,enjoy.
Well, have fun doubling up feminism with your NZ Nazism.

Nazism?
That would involve racist nationalism. I'm a centralist who appreciates diversity. Sorry, I'm not one of those. I think you have me confused with Steve Bannon.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top