One Down Forty-Nine to Go - FL cracks down on election cheaters

[BlindBoo]

"
If you look carefully at the numbers in their reporting, some of the changes are not easily explained away.

Bergen county, for example. The current image has Murphy winning with 52% of the 219,000 votes.


The earlier image for Bergen county listed Ciattarelli in the lead with 52% of 219,000 votes. What accounts for the change? Was that just an innocent typo? If so, shouldn’t the Times clear the air and announce that they have, once again proven themselves to be an unreliable source of information?

But there are other strange numbers to account for… like Hudson being 100% at 109,032 votes AND being 100% at 116,668 votes. Is there an innocent explanation? There could be, but the public is owed some transparency, isn’t it?

How about Burlington? 54% Republican at 103,974 and 97% of votes AND ALSO 52% Democrat with 143,000 votes and 97% reporting? That’s a pretty big jump for both numbers to reflect ‘97% reporting’.


Somerset flipped blue, adding another 20,000 or so votes AFTER they had seen 100% reporting.

Even Mercer added close to 30,000 votes and only ticked up 1% of total reporting.

Could there be an innocent explanation? Perhaps."

RUH-ROH: Curious Data Anomaly Triggers Calls For New Jersey Election Audit

If you've read our story celebrating what might become the ridiculous underdog success story of a New Jersey truck driver in yesterday's election you've already seen something that hinted at the anomaly in question.

clashdaily.com

Dodgy as hell!!!!

Greg

So when the process completes and all challenges are heard, all the legal appeals process plays out, and all those things you mentioned were explained to an election judge, and the final count is certified by the election officials. Should the loser concede and call for unity, or should they bring up those allegations and expect everyone in their party to fall in line and pretend that the legal process was not fair, based on those allegations?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So when the process completes and all challenges are heard, all the legal appeals process plays out, and all those things you mentioned were explained to an election judge, and the final count is certified by the election officials. Should the loser concede and call for unity, or should they bring up those allegations and expect everyone in their party to fall in line and pretend that the legal process was not fair, based on those allegations?

Why are you so hell bent on trying to derail this thread?

 

[BlindBoo]

Why are you so hell bent on trying to derail this thread?

I answered a question.

De'Santis wants to go after the tiny small fries, and lets the big fish off the hook by embracing the BIGLIE.

 

[lennypartiv]

What a waste of money! DeSantis is hitting every "stupid button" out there. Passing laws to allowing citizens to run down protestors, banning mask mandates, and behaving like he's lost his mind.

The good news is that DeSantis is destroying his own chances of winning the Presidency.

DeSantis should win easily against Kamel-Toe in 2024.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

DeSantis should win easily against Kamel-Toe in 2024.

But isn't it nice how the left gives us advice on how not to lose?

 

[lennypartiv]

I answered a question.

De'Santis wants to go after the tiny small fries, and lets the big fish off the hook by embracing the BIGLIE.

What big fish is DeSantis letting off the hook?

 

[themirrorthief]

What a waste of money! DeSantis is hitting every "stupid button" out there. Passing laws to allowing citizens to run down protestors, banning mask mandates, and behaving like he's lost his mind.

The good news is that DeSantis is destroying his own chances of winning the Presidency.

if old crapping his pants biden can get elected anyone can

 

[lennypartiv]

if old crapping his pants biden can get elected anyone can

It's amazing what can happen when ballots are allowed to mysteriously appear at the vote counting centers after midnight.

 

[Lesh]

I'm happy to see any effort into making mail-in harder and under more scrutiny. Mail-in draws the stupidest of our public to vote

And that's another thing. If you're too lazy to submit your own ballot, you don't deserve to vote

Until 2020 mail in voting a predominantly a Republican thing

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Until 2020 mail in voting a predominantly a Republican thing

It was? I anxiously await your credible link.

 

[lennypartiv]

Until 2020 mail in voting a predominantly a Republican thing

Mail in voting is fine for important executives who travel for business and can't get back in time for election day. For everyone else that is absolutely no need for mail in voting.