Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you're passing sensitive material, as she was, it doesn't need to be stamped.
against the wall
The emails were not marked classified at the time they were sent, but were "were upgraded at the request of the intelligence community," State Department spokesman John Kirby said.
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
I would simply imagine it is because the F.B.I. haven't finished their investigation yet.
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
I would simply imagine it is because the F.B.I. haven't finished their investigation yet.
Teabaggers imagine all sorts of crazy stuff.
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
Hey, idiot... Who states that an Email is Classified?
Guess who?
The State Dept....
Once again the dipshit RWers have made an ass out of themselves....
If you got any fucking go to court... Lets televise the whole thing, Clinton wins easy....
Thing is, you have nothing... Everyone knows it and you are just inventing shit...
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
I would simply imagine it is because the F.B.I. haven't finished their investigation yet.
Teabaggers imagine all sorts of crazy stuff.
Well dipshit, they haven't completed their investigation.
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
Hey, idiot... Who states that an Email is Classified?
Guess who?
The State Dept....
Once again the dipshit RWers have made an ass out of themselves....
If you got any fucking go to court... Lets televise the whole thing, Clinton wins easy....
Thing is, you have nothing... Everyone knows it and you are just inventing shit...
Didn't they have 9 committees investigating? last one lasting for 9 hours?? and they found shit and wasted millions ,,,,thats all they're good for waste and wars
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
I would simply imagine it is because the F.B.I. haven't finished their investigation yet.
Teabaggers imagine all sorts of crazy stuff.
Well dipshit, they haven't completed their investigation.
So that leaves you free to make up all kinds of crazy shit that you will chose to believe even after the facts are given.
And the sources for this information about being classified remain anonymous within the State Dept.
No indictments, no charges. Why do you think that is? Is money changing hands to squash this?
I would simply imagine it is because the F.B.I. haven't finished their investigation yet.
Teabaggers imagine all sorts of crazy stuff.
Well dipshit, they haven't completed their investigation.
So that leaves you free to make up all kinds of crazy shit that you will chose to believe even after the facts are given.
What facts? Again dipshit, the F.B.I. has NOT completed their investigation.
If you're passing sensitive material, as she was, it doesn't need to be stamped.
then both of you nay sayers argue with the state department
Content is classified as defined by it's content, NOT by whether it has a stamp marked "classified". Nice try.
Hey, idiot... Who states that an Email is Classified?
Guess who?
The State Dept....
Once again the dipshit RWers have made an ass out of themselves....
If you got any fucking go to court... Lets televise the whole thing, Clinton wins easy....
Thing is, you have nothing... Everyone knows it and you are just inventing shit...
Didn't they have 9 committees investigating? last one lasting for 9 hours?? and they found shit and wasted millions ,,,,thats all they're good for waste and wars