On Hannity....did obama have a warrant to record General Flynn? If not, arrests need to be made....
- Thread starter 2aguy
- Start date
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,074
- 53,595
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #22
For those who understand this......tweet and post this on Facebook.....and send this out.....this is the only way to push back against the left......they need to be arrested when they break the law, and the public has to know that they broke the law.....
jillian
Princess
what are you talking about idiota?
every person who deals with Russia is recorded....by both their people and ours.
you might also want to take a look at the patriot act, little loon, because no warrant is needed.... remember?
even if a warrant were needed, not having one would not result in charges.
but thanks for playing, nutter butter.
jillian
Princess
poor mentally ill trump trolls
Snouter
Can You Smell Me
- Aug 3, 2013
- 13,666
- 5,013
- 350
Well, what word would you prefer when someone humiliates and embarrasses someone else with logic and facts like Hannity does to regressive leftists?
RDD_1210
Forms his own opinions
- May 13, 2010
- 18,981
- 1,817
- 265
Let me know when that happens and I'll tell you.
Doc1
Gold Member
There is no end to your stupidity kid.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,074
- 53,595
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #30
what are you talking about idiota?
every person who deals with Russia is recorded....by both their people and ours.
you might also want to take a look at the patriot act, little loon, because no warrant is needed.... remember?
even if a warrant were needed, not having one would not result in charges.
but thanks for playing, nutter butter.
You are the idiot.....you can't just tap the phone of an American citizen moron.....especially if they are talking to a foreign Ambassador.......there are protections against wire tapping for the U.S. citizen moron...
Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks
But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.
"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained. "If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."
Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.
"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."
Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December. The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.
"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.
Obama's minions stepped in it......and it is going to get bad for them...
What did obama know and when did he know it........he had access to this information....did he get a warrant? Did he authorize it?
mamooth
Diamond Member
"Now we go nuclear. He will die in jail."
.... pretty much the entire US intel community, concerning Trump
‘He will die in jail’: Intelligence community ready to ‘go nuclear’ on Trump, senior source says
Unless a person is absolutely squeaky clean, declaring open war on the entire intel community will end badly for that person. It's going to end very badly for Trump.
.... pretty much the entire US intel community, concerning Trump
‘He will die in jail’: Intelligence community ready to ‘go nuclear’ on Trump, senior source says
Unless a person is absolutely squeaky clean, declaring open war on the entire intel community will end badly for that person. It's going to end very badly for Trump.
tinydancer
Diamond Member
There's a procedure in place to protect the American citizen. And they didn't follow it. Too bad. So sad. House intel is not investigating Flynn but the intelligence agencies involved.
In particular hunting down the leakers who will be wearing orange at the end of this. Flynn commited no criminal act. But the leakers did.
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,993
- 1,130
what are you talking about idiota?
every person who deals with Russia is recorded....by both their people and ours.
you might also want to take a look at the patriot act, little loon, because no warrant is needed.... remember?
even if a warrant were needed, not having one would not result in charges.
but thanks for playing, nutter butter.
You are the idiot.....you can't just tap the phone of an American citizen moron.....especially if they are talking to a foreign Ambassador.......there are protections against wire tapping for the U.S. citizen moron...
Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks
But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.
"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained. "If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."
Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.
"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."
Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December. The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.
"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.
Obama's minions stepped in it......and it is going to get bad for them...
What did obama know and when did he know it........he had access to this information....did he get a warrant? Did he authorize it?
here idiot ...
Nunes Letter Intercept
wire tapping is a legal issue .. deal with it.
koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,136
- 14,072
- 2,190
koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,136
- 14,072
- 2,190
Obama needs to be tried for treason. And sentenced to death.
"The execution of two human beings is a grave matter. But even graver is the thought of the millions of dead whose deaths may be directly attributable to what these spies have done.”
Rosenbergs executed - Jun 19, 1953 - HISTORY.com
"The execution of two human beings is a grave matter. But even graver is the thought of the millions of dead whose deaths may be directly attributable to what these spies have done.”
Rosenbergs executed - Jun 19, 1953 - HISTORY.com
tinydancer
Diamond Member
Idiot. Flynn in his capacity as NSA had every right to contact global security individuals. He committed no criminal act.
On the other hand Nunes is starting off by investigating the FBI and the leakers.
Oh happy day.
Siete
Platinum Member
- May 19, 2014
- 34,325
- 3,993
- 1,130
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Which party has been more destructive to the middle-class? Democrats or Republicans?- Started by BrokeLoser
- Replies: 1
-
-
Say what you want about Trump - but he seems pretty coherent- Started by CrazyTrader55
- Replies: 11
-
Trump vows to find the leaker that leaked sensitive info about missing Airman .- Started by yidnar
- Replies: 30
-
Trump raises Canadian annexation in British author’s book: “I guess it’s not going to happen!”- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
