Thangyew. Stole it from Frank Caliendo.
If you make a racist crack about a target, you're commenting on a trait of that target that is a circumstance of birth -- her race. She has no control over that (if 'control' were even desirable)
as opposed to what? the fact that Ivanka can get a sex change operation?
uhhhhhhhhhhh................ what?
Yyyyyyeah I'm uh, sure Ivanka can get a sex change operation.... sure. Whatever that's got to do with the price of eggs in the average uterus. Perhaps it would help fend off her father too.
Thanks for that excursion down a side road to nowhere.
That cannot be compared with a different comment about a target's behaviour, which is something the target CAN control.
this only serves to prove that the left has been lying about misogynist remarks like the "C" word used to describe some women by those on the left...again is it your position that Ivanka can do something about being born a woman [if she wanted to] by having an operration so that exempts sammy b [and all of us] from misogyny when it comes to using that word?
I have no idea who "the left" is supposed to be but I actually type with both hands. If you have a specific quote from *ME* --- and that's a singular --- then show it. I stand behind my posts and I remember every one. Whatcha got?
Still waiting for what this "misogynist word" is.
I guess, if you were looking for something not addressing the issue of misogyny by sammy this would be the simple enough one...in any case you are still attempting to move the goal posts away from the fact that this was a misogynist rant by sammy b and the left sees no problem with that...lemme ask yo something now, do you think sams use of the "c" word was misogynistic?...now it does not get any simpler than that.
Once AGAIN something doesn't become "misogynist" just because you use the adjective. We could call it "purple" or "fat" or "woody" and it wouldn't take those qualities on either.
and here/there it is, the lefts hypocrisy is exposed so the goal posts are moved to a place so far from the point that it is unrecognizable from the original position, which of course is the intent of the entire exercise...
in the below post you seem to have lost your way in all the text you seem to need to answer yes or no or more to the point to avoid answer yes or no...
If you call somebody an "asshole" ---- are we supposed to think you're talking about a lower intestine?
,
no more than if you call someone the "C" word would you be expected to think you're talking about a body part, left wing orthodoxy would normally require you to think misogyny instead...the entire reason for asking the question of misogyny in this case is to show the left really does not consider the "C" word to be misogynist, they in fact themselves view women in such terms....btw, do you consider sammy b's use of the word to be misogynistic?
sorry bout the nesting, not sure what happened