Okay folks! Which cup holds the ACORN?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Iglesias_(attorney)


In October 2006 (prior to the 2006 midterm election) Senator Pete Domenici called to ask about the progress of an investigation, New Mexico U.S. Attorney Iglesias said he felt this inquiry was trying to "pressure" him to speed up indictments in a federal corruption investigation that involved State Senator Manny Aragon. When Iglesias said, he didn’t think an indictment would be issued before November, "the line went dead." Iglesias was fired one month after the election by the Bush Administration as part of the Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy. In October, Representative Heather Wilson also called about the indictments in a federal corruption investigation that also involved Aragon."[15]

Allen Weh, chairman of the Republican Party of New Mexico, said he complained in 2005 about then-U.S. Attorney David Iglesias to a White House aide for Rove, asking that Iglesias be removed.[4] Then in 2006 Rove personally told Weh “He’s gone,” Rove said.[4]

One of the stated reasons for Iglesias' dismissal, by Administration officials, was dissatisfaction in his prosecution of voter-fraud cases. Nevertheless, Iglesias "had been heralded for his expertise in that area by the Justice Department, which twice selected him to train other federal prosecutors to pursue election crimes" and was "one of two chief federal prosecutors invited to teach at a 'voting integrity symposium' in October 2005… sponsored by Justice's public integrity and civil rights sections."[16]

Iglesias said that in October 2006 he received inquiries regarding the timing of a federal probe of a kickback scheme involving local Democrats from two congressmen whom Iglesias refused to name for fear of retribution. He said that they appeared eager for there to be an indictment in time to assist the Republicans in the upcoming November election, and believed that he was ultimately fired for refusing to expedite matters.[17] In comments to the Albuquerque Journal he described them as "two members of the New Mexico delegation".[18]

The Justice Department said that part of the reason for Iglesias's dismissal was his frequent absences. In response to this charge, Iglesias stated that the reason for these absences was his mandatory 40-day per year service as part of the Navy Reserve, in which he still serves as a commander.[19] This represents a possible violation of USERRA.

In October 2008, a report by the Department of Justice's Inspector General found that Iglesias had been wrongfully dismissed because he had refused to pursue prosecutions against the Democrat-linked community organization ACORN and a prominent New Mexico Democrat. "The real reasons for Iglesias' removal were the complaints from New Mexico Republican politicians and party activists about how Iglesias handled voter fraud and public corruption cases in the state," the report says. The Inspector General's report says that Senator Domenici's complaints were the "primary" reason Iglesias was fired.[3]
 
Last edited:
You the sort of person who's comfortable letting bank robbers into banks up until conviction? Maybe you think letting sexual predators visit schools is just fine until they have to go to jail?

We have a thing called innocent before proven guilty in this country. The fact you call yourself saveliberty but are willing to violate one of our oldest's principles in order to score political points is sad. I'll ask that you reconsider such foolish ignorance.

Most judges will make these things conditions of bail. Oh, you didn't think about that did you? Just thought you'd open your mouth and lip off some snappy little reply to show us all how smart you are. How did that work for you?
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Iglesias_(attorney)


In October 2006 (prior to the 2006 midterm election) Senator Pete Domenici called to ask about the progress of an investigation, New Mexico U.S. Attorney Iglesias said he felt this inquiry was trying to "pressure" him to speed up indictments in a federal corruption investigation that involved State Senator Manny Aragon. When Iglesias said, he didn’t think an indictment would be issued before November, "the line went dead." Iglesias was fired one month after the election by the Bush Administration as part of the Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy. In October, Representative Heather Wilson also called about the indictments in a federal corruption investigation that also involved Aragon."[15]

Allen Weh, chairman of the Republican Party of New Mexico, said he complained in 2005 about then-U.S. Attorney David Iglesias to a White House aide for Rove, asking that Iglesias be removed.[4] Then in 2006 Rove personally told Weh “He’s gone,” Rove said.[4]

One of the stated reasons for Iglesias' dismissal, by Administration officials, was dissatisfaction in his prosecution of voter-fraud cases. Nevertheless, Iglesias "had been heralded for his expertise in that area by the Justice Department, which twice selected him to train other federal prosecutors to pursue election crimes" and was "one of two chief federal prosecutors invited to teach at a 'voting integrity symposium' in October 2005… sponsored by Justice's public integrity and civil rights sections."[16]

Iglesias said that in October 2006 he received inquiries regarding the timing of a federal probe of a kickback scheme involving local Democrats from two congressmen whom Iglesias refused to name for fear of retribution. He said that they appeared eager for there to be an indictment in time to assist the Republicans in the upcoming November election, and believed that he was ultimately fired for refusing to expedite matters.[17] In comments to the Albuquerque Journal he described them as "two members of the New Mexico delegation".[18]

The Justice Department said that part of the reason for Iglesias's dismissal was his frequent absences. In response to this charge, Iglesias stated that the reason for these absences was his mandatory 40-day per year service as part of the Navy Reserve, in which he still serves as a commander.[19] This represents a possible violation of USERRA.

In October 2008, a report by the Department of Justice's Inspector General found that Iglesias had been wrongfully dismissed because he had refused to pursue prosecutions against the Democrat-linked community organization ACORN and a prominent New Mexico Democrat. "The real reasons for Iglesias' removal were the complaints from New Mexico Republican politicians and party activists about how Iglesias handled voter fraud and public corruption cases in the state," the report says. The Inspector General's report says that Senator Domenici's complaints were the "primary" reason Iglesias was fired.[3]
Uh huh. An attorney got fired for refusing to prosecute fraud in an organization with a long history of it.

And, your point is?
 
In October 2008, a report by the Department of Justice's Inspector General found that Iglesias had been wrongfully dismissed because he had refused to pursue prosecutions against the Democrat-linked community organization ACORN and a prominent New Mexico Democrat. "The real reasons for Iglesias' removal were the complaints from New Mexico Republican politicians and party activists about how Iglesias handled voter fraud and public corruption cases in the state," the report says. The Inspector General's report says that Senator Domenici's complaints were the "primary" reason Iglesias was fired.[3]
 
Now ACORN IS DEAD!

There is no more fake boogey man to beat up.

How will you now rationalize your HATE for any organization that registars poor people?
 
Why do you now insist any organization that registars poor people is corrupt????
 
I thought so.

You dont care about the real claims of election tampering you only care about winning the elections.

Poor people voting makes it very hard for the Rs to win.

You want FEWER Americans voting so you can win which tranlates into you dont believe in democracy
 
Well, if said organization breaks the law as ACORN has, then they of course will be prosecuted.
 
I thought so.

You dont care about the real claims of election tampering you only care about winning the elections.

Poor people voting makes it very hard for the Rs to win.

You want FEWER Americans voting so you can win which tranlates into you dont believe in democracy
Dare I expect you to know what non sequiturs are?

Hey, but Al Capone was a decorated WWII soldier. Why, oh why, am I anti-military?
 
I thought so.

You dont care about the real claims of election tampering you only care about winning the elections.

Poor people voting makes it very hard for the Rs to win.

You want FEWER Americans voting so you can win which tranlates into you dont believe in democracy


Sounds like you want the Dems to win even if the win was gained using fraudulant votes.
Apparantly winning is all your concerned with as well.

So much for you thoughts on lawfull. LOL
 
Last edited:
I thought so.

You dont care about the real claims of election tampering you only care about winning the elections.

Poor people voting makes it very hard for the Rs to win.

You want FEWER Americans voting so you can win which tranlates into you dont believe in democracy


Sounds like you want the Dems to win even if the win was gained using fraudulant votes.
Apparantly winning is all your concerned with as well.

So much for you thoughts on lawfull. LOL

Why do you suggest that poor people are fraudulent voters?
 
I thought so.

You dont care about the real claims of election tampering you only care about winning the elections.

Poor people voting makes it very hard for the Rs to win.

You want FEWER Americans voting so you can win which tranlates into you dont believe in democracy


Sounds like you want the Dems to win even if the win was gained using fraudulant votes.
Apparantly winning is all your concerned with as well.

So much for you thoughts on lawfull. LOL

Why do you suggest that poor people are fraudulent voters?
You really ARE that stupid.

Your brain must hurt. I mean, I know you must have one as you are typing, but...wow.
 
Yeah Mary poppins and Mickey Mouse are soooooooooo poor. That's just some of the people ACORN tried to register in Ohio.

Give me a break.

What does a person trying to register under a cartoon character name have to do with Acorn?

Those are some of the "people" that ACORN registered as "voters" in Cleveland. Those are the most egregious examples, but ACORN registers people that do not exist every election. That's why they were finally shut down.

ACORN couldn't register people. That is the jurisdiction of the county boards of elections in Ohio.
 
Tell me what exactly ACORN did that makes you hate it????

Getting poor people voting?

Voter Fraud

Do you know what vote fraud is?

There were NO votes from the phoney voter aps filled out.

The people were reported by ACORN themselves in most of the cases.


The temp workers were hired by acorn then they PRETENDED to work and instead filled out the aps themselves. THE victim IS ACORN.

If you hired someone to put fliers on doors for your company and they instead pretended to deliver them have you commited a crime?

No you have been cheated.

You people refuse to admitt that there is no voter fraud.

Go get any proof you have anyone voted under the name of Micky Mouse in any election because of Acorn.
 
Last edited:
I WOULD recommend that no one feed the troll, but TM is not capable of knowing HOW to troll. She is just seriously retarded. I'm not kidding, either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top