LOLOLOLOL
Now you are in total deflection mode for your repeated lies and ZERO evidence as you again LYING about me claiming I am a right winger (no evidence provided) claim that I am a republican or a former one (No evidence provided) who says I can no longer support the party (no evidence provided) and now reduced to stupid assumptions whether I voted for Trump or not if that somehow helps liberals.
Now some real evidence about what
I posted:
April 19, 2022
Pence didn't ruin anything as he followed his certification duties to the letter as Trump was wrong about it which I pointed out several time with the evidence.
You apparently will ignore the evidence I posted because you made up your mind against him because you can't handle the truth.
===
April 11, 2021
Trump was very wrong about then V.P. role in the January 6 Congressional certification process. He thought Pence can decide by himself to change the long certified EC votes results, I was stunned when he pushed that baloney.
The role for the V.P. in the January 6 Certification process is actually very narrow and specific in the Constitution, he has ZERO power to change them, that power is with the Congress.
===
March 30, 2021
I didn't start or support them, long wanted the controversy to end after the SCOTUS decision in mid December to drop the Texas et al lawsuit. That is when they should have stopped complaining and get into the transition process.
Trump and many republicans were wrong about VP. Pence role in the January 6 certification process, I said so then that Pence had no such power to overturn them, had the gall to post the Constitution describing his very limited role in the certification process.
===
March 20,
2021
Not going to happen.
Congress needs to end this absurd abortion controversy by
banning partial birth and third trimester abortions, allow the rest. Then it is no longer a SCOTUS decision but a Congressional one.
But both political parties takes the extreme position, that is why it will NEVER be resolved, as an Independent I see that the compromise solution is the obvious way to go....., but those partisan extremists will fight doing the obvious, thus it will never get resolved.
Gee no wonder I am a Free Thinking independent........, I get to watch the stupid never ending infighting of America from the sidelines.
===
August 10, 2021
Again you don't read what I said, I haven't protected anyone, just stating the obvious which is easy for me since I am a Free Thinking Independent don't have to defend an ideology at all.
Trump has been investigated for a few years now, still no charges against him......
You didn't read my first link where it shows the DA stated strongly that Cuomo has committed numerous sexual violations.
===
January 11, 2021
I am a Free Thinking INDEPENDENT...., not a Republican.
===
June 3, 2020
No because I am a free thinking independent, didn't vote for Trump.
You go down in flames, yet again.......
===
April 21, 2022
LOL so typical dead on arrival fallacy filled bullshit shows up because it has a red eyed drooling warmist yellowbelly GOOK behind it.
As usual your Swiss cheese brain forgets that I have repeatedly acknowledged warming trend since the 1690's, since 1850's since the late 1970's.
The COOLING trend since 2016 is true and factual which is why you are so upset since you can't refute it, which is why you never try, never claimed it eliminated the underlying long-term warming trend.
Meanwhile,
Post One article remains Unchallenged.
===
February 22, 2022
Sun/Ocean dynamo is causing most of the warming trend it is called an elevated El-Nino phase trend, when it declines to the dominant La-Nina phase trend the warming will cease and cooling becomes the dominant trend.
===
April 1, 2022
Your stupidity never ceases to amuse me since I said SIX YEARS since the last El-Nino and posted the chart showing it you ignore it to post a chart starting from 1850 a warming trend I never disputed and told YOU so many times.
I think you are mentally ill since you constantly forget that I have many times stated in my postings that it has been warming since the mid 1800's since 1979 and heck even posted charts similar to yours showing the distinct warming trends in them even posted what Dr. Jones said about short warming trends since the 1800's.
You forgot this post I made about 25 times in the forum since 2018.
BBC
Q&A: Professor Phil Jones
Saturday, 13 February 2010
The BBC's environment analyst Roger Harrabin put questions to Professor Jones, including several gathered from climate sceptics. The questions were put to Professor Jones with the co-operation of UEA's press office.
Excerpt:
A - Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical?
An initial point to make is that in the responses to these questions I've assumed that when you talk about the global temperature record, you mean the record that combines the estimates from land regions with those from the marine regions of the world. CRU produces the land component, with the Met Office Hadley Centre producing the marine component.
Temperature data for the period 1860-1880 are more uncertain, because of sparser coverage, than for later periods in the 20th Century. The 1860-1880 period is also only 21 years in length. As for the two periods 1910-40 and 1975-1998 the warming rates are not statistically significantly different (see numbers below).
I have also included the trend over the period 1975 to 2009, which has a very similar trend to the period 1975-1998.
So, in answer to the question, the warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other.
LINK
=====
I have agreed with his answer about warming trends since 2010.
You can't address the 6 year cooling trend and you know it which is why you ducked for your dumb 170 year chart that doesn't address my 6 year chart at all.
You clearly suffer from GOOK disease you should see a brain doctor to get rid of it.
===
July 22, 2021
The stupidity of Old Rocks comes through vividly, the small minded man can't address a small time period, never read the same time frame of his
own charts that are showing clear drops in temperature of the last few years.
I never disputed the warming trend from 1850 to 2021, thus your chart is irrelevant since you are not addressing the current cooling trend since 2014.
He has not once addressed the fact that HadCrut4 data does show a drop in temperature for the last 7 1/2 years, so does UAH. He tries to hide the current cooling by using charts from 1850 to 2021 to make it hard to see which is dishonest.
===
February 23, 2021
Another misleading and probably lying narrative.
Hardly anyone disputes the warming trend since the late 1970's What is being disputed in the "man made" warming part of the warming trend, there is very little of it going on and the warm forcing math makes it clear that mankind adds very little to it.
The NASA consensus propaganda is well written for science illiterates like you who has no clue to how they mislead you so easily.
===
June 28, 2021
Everyone here knows there is a warming trend, but some people think it is driven by a trace gas with a trace IR absorption range (about 5% of the IR window) and cures your impotence too.
The link is just another "consensus" bullshit, one that doesn't promote science research at all, it is a
POLITICAL statement nothing more.
==================
I can go on and on showing what a big liar you are and how wrong you are about who I am.
I left the democrat party in the early 1990's NEVER joined the Republican party have been Independent ever since.
