Ohio Rules That Pronoun Policy Violates First Amendment Rights

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Maybe so. But keeping things pleasant at the moment in a one on one personal encounter I don't think is going to undermine any cultural structure.

I’ll leave that to my conversational counterpart. Courtesy is a 2-way street.

 

[WEATHER53]

I’ll leave that to my conversational counterpart. Courtesy is a 2-way street.

Courtesy < Reality

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Courtesy < Reality

That depends upon the individual.

 

[WEATHER53]

That depends upon the individual.

And that’s part of the problem. Feelings and sentiments over facts
Thinkers say no

 

[WEATHER53]

I’ll leave that to my conversational counterpart. Courtesy is a 2-way street.

2 way street for a head on collision into facts

 

[Bitterhook]

What? Given currently conditions I don't see this being an issue. If one believes in the pendulum theory, then the pendulum has started swinging the other way.

The only condition would be rather or not someone has been granted the power to make a word mean whatever they want it to, and there is not a back and forth to it. The desire to suggest that power may somehow be conditional is the issue.

 

[WEATHER53]

The only condition would be rather or not someone has been granted the power to make a word mean whatever they want it to, and there is not a back and forth to it. The desire to suggest that power may somehow be conditional is the issue.

The word means whatever you want it to mean little baby apple dumpling
Lib 101

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then the trans students should just be able to refer to them by the pronoun

"FUCKFACE"

Free speech and all

 

[Bitterhook]

The word means whatever you want it to mean little baby apple dumpling
Lib 101

If someone wanted to stomp their feet and pitch a fit because I wouldn't let them have their way for no other reason than their desires, it wouldn't indicate that I was being the baby in that situation, but progressive liberals like to pretend a lot of things are not what they really are.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If someone wanted to stomp their feet and pitch a fit because I wouldn't let them have their way for no other reason than their desires, it wouldn't indicate that I was being the baby in that situation, but progressive liberals like to pretend a lot of things are not what they really are.

Of course, the cruelty is the point, so that crybabying isn't going to land.

 

[Bitterhook]

Of course, the cruelty is the point, so that crybabying isn't going to land.

If I were to tell you to shut up it would not be a cruelty because I would be trying to help you not look like such a retard. But I don't want you to, and I am cruel enough to encourage you to keep talking.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Suspension and expulsion for not using preferred pronouns? There's no way I would allow my children to be a part of a school like that. I'm glad that this nonsense is ending though.

To Be Truly Independent, Go Back to "He" for "He or She"

It's hypocritical to oppose this transgender silliness and not oppose the Singular They, which is common babble on the Netrix.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

If someone thinks they actually have the power to make a pronoun mean whatever they want it to, then they can make the words in the First Amendment

If Someone Lives in a Glass House, He Shouldn't Throw Stones

You just did that, referring to someone as a "they." That is not only brain-damaging, violating a basic category of thought, singular or plural, but it also collectivist. Your language-influencers are on the same side as the media you reject.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

What? Given currently conditions I don't see this being an issue. If one believes in the pendulum theory, then the pendulum has started swinging the other way.

When Both Sides Are Imprisoned, the Pendulum Is Flying Off Its Handle

Not until the Singular They is silenced forever.

 

[Bitterhook]

If Someone Lives in a Glass House, He Shouldn't Throw Stones

You just did that, referring to someone as a "they." That is not only brain-damaging, violating a basic category of thought, singular or plural, but it also collectivist. Your language-influencers are on the same side as the media you reject.

I used someone precisely because it doesn't matter who they are, and it could refer to any number of people.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

If someone wanted to stomp their feet and pitch a fit progressive liberals like to pretend a lot of things are not what they really are.

Conservatives Will Never Admit How Much They Are Controlled by Liberals

You're really trapped if you don't realize that the Singular They was imposed by the Left, specifically radical feminist college professors.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I used someone precisely because it doesn't matter who they are, and it could refer to any number of people.

There's no reason you can't use "people" instead

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If I were to tell you to shut up it would not be a cruelty because I would be trying to help you not look like such a retard. But I don't want you to, and I am cruel enough to encourage you to keep talking.

Blah blah blah

The idea of kids being cruel to other kids makes you tingly.

 

[Bitterhook]

There's no reason you can't use "people" instead

There's no reason I have to use 'people' instead.

 

[SweetTea]

Sorry, I don't turn to rando, uneducated bigots on the internet for my cues on psychology. I turn to psychologists.

You mean like this guy or does he not count since you likely don't agree with his professional opinion.

Psychotherapist says 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is real pathology, plaguing 75 percent of his patients