Oh, those damned scientists!

More like those, "damn propagandists".

99.9% of scientists? We are suppose to believe that? Why? Because Cornell makes a "news release" that says so?

How about offering us proof. Because I can say for a fact, you can not prove this claim because it is simply the opinion of researchers that 99.9% of scientists agree. Nobody asked every single scientist.

More propaganda, no study, no facts to debate, just another dumb ass Old Crock post.

How about linking to the study that proves this? I bet you that you can not, that it is hidden, that it must be paid for, and nobody is going to pay to see the study because if we get to see the study, it will not say what the headlines claim.
 
Denier weenie tactic1: Pretend the term "climate change" in such contexts doesn't imply AGW, i.e. "attributed largely to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by the use of fossil fuels."

Exactly. Smart people read up on such subjects before commenting so as not to appear so dumb and/or in denial.

Then you should do so. You merely repeat what failed scientists claim. There are a couple of people on here who are real scientists and they talk about how climatologists don't follow the scientific method. So I read up on the scientific method, and they are correct. The climatologists DON'T follow it.

That means the climatologists are lying.
 
Then you should do so. You merely repeat what failed scientists claim.
Oh, you must mean those "failed scientists" like the Oxford Languages/Google dictionary. Yes, Congratulations. You've convinced me that you too are beyond hope of redemption. Deniers rejoice!

Here's another chance..
There are a couple of people on here who are real scientists
Don't be such a wuss. Name names or piss off.
 
99.9% LOL


But we've been hearing this for 15 years now. Everyone and their brother familiar with this theory.

The problem for the Climate Change Industry is........nobody is caring about the science. If the public was caring, the electric grid wouldnt be dOmiNaTeD by fossil fuels like it is now and will be for decades. Solar and wind still make up well less than 10% of the electricity provided to the grid. Know what that is? Thats laughable.

Nobody is caring about the 99%........... :cul2: :cul2:

Come talk to us when solar/wind account for even 10% :spinner:
 
Hey BTW.......have the progressives in this forum taken my advice and decided to take mask protection seriously in this Covid ravaged world? This is an option more obtainable than a NASA style space suit.

They are going fast........get one while you can.........



rmwqv19d7yp31.jpg
 
Gee, that is about the exact same number of scientists who used to all agree that the Earth was flat and the center of the universe!

All these same scientists all laughed at Einstein and Peter Higgs, too, until Relativity and the Higgs Boson were PROVEN to their stupid asses.
Damn, but you are really stupid. They were called natural philosophers 2200 years ago, and they measured the circumference of the Earth long before the religious dumb fucks declared it flat.

"240 B.C. Eratosthenes Measures the Earth. By around 500 B.C., most ancient Greeks believed that Earth was round, not flat. But they had no idea how big the planet is until about 240 B.C., when Eratosthenes devised a clever method of estimating its circumference.Jun 21, 2006"
 
Wow. That's North Korean level of propaganda. I have a real hard problem believing them when they buy beachfront property. Seems that those with money are trying to kick all of the middle class people off of the beaches so they can have them for themselves because they certainly aren't worried about the supposed sea level increases.
Flapping yap and telling lies is hardly the way to impress. However, you ignorance of scientists and what they can buy demonstrates an impressive amount of ignorance.
 
But we've been hearing this for 15 years now. Everyone and their brother familiar with this theory.

The problem for the Climate Change Industry is........nobody is caring about the science. If the public was caring, the electric grid wouldnt be dOmiNaTeD by fossil fuels like it is now and will be for decades. Solar and wind still make up well less than 10% of the electricity provided to the grid. Know what that is? Thats laughable.

Nobody is caring about the 99%........... :cul2: :cul2:

Come talk to us when solar/wind account for even 10% :spinner:
Renewables just surpassed coal in the amount of electricity put on the grid. Will do the same for fossil fuels and nuclear in the coming decade.
 
Well, the article is trash to begin with.

"More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans,"

Climate change has existed for.... wait for this.... FOREVER.

It existed in the times of the dinosaurs, it existed before the dinosaurs and it's existed ever since.

How the fart did humans have an impact on the change in climate before humans even existed?
When the climate changes, past, present, or future, there is a driver for that change. It can be increased or decrease solar radiation, it can be increased or decreased GHG's in the atmosphere. It can be an Impact or volcanic eruption. In the present case, we have increased the CO2 from 280 ppm to 412.5 ppm, and CH4 from 722 ppb to 1492 ppb at present. And we are seeing the results now in the storms, droughts, fires, floods, and heat waves worldwide. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have ignorant morons stating it cannot be so.
 
Damn, but you are really stupid.

Stopping jerking off telling yourself crap that we all already know, cumstain. Your theories are full of more holes than a slice of Swiss cheese. I happen to be an expert on ancient civilizations and their theories of the universe and your climate crap is just one more bloated gasbag of propaganda exposed many years ago as just one more socialist movement unable to answer the most basic questions, so of course you try to attack the messenger since you cannot defend the message.
 
Then you should do so. You merely repeat what failed scientists claim. There are a couple of people on here who are real scientists and they talk about how climatologists don't follow the scientific method. So I read up on the scientific method, and they are correct. The climatologists DON'T follow it.

That means the climatologists are lying.
Virtually every Scientific Society in the world states that AGW is real and a clear and present danger. That you try to pick out climatologists by themselves is simply and indication of your vast ignorance.
 
Stopping jerking off telling yourself crap that we all already know, cumstain. Your theories are full of more holes than a slice of Swiss cheese. I happen to be an expert on ancient civilizations and their theories of the universe and your climate crap is just one more bloated gasbag of propaganda exposed many years ago as just one more socialist movement unable to answer the most basic questions, so of course you try to attack the messenger since you cannot defend the message.
Then if you know that, why did you post the lie that the scientists said the world was flat, when it was the religious people that made that statement? Mental problems, maybe? LOL
 
You've been here for a while. Surely you have picked up enough of prior conversations to realize that the argument you're making is meaningless drivel and is the sort of thing you might get from a 12-year old.
You mean like Greta?
 
Oh, you must mean those "failed scientists" like the Oxford Languages/Google dictionary. Yes, Congratulations. You've convinced me that you too are beyond hope of redemption. Deniers rejoice!

Here's another chance..

Don't be such a wuss. Name names or piss off.
1635302601434.png





Greg
 
Renewables just surpassed coal in the amount of electricity put on the grid. Will do the same for fossil fuels and nuclear in the coming decade.

LOL.........as usual, all you do in this space is lie your ass off you fool! And every time, I train wreck your ass. After 10 years, arent you sick and tired of being pwn'd time, after time, after time, after time........

With this post, Im making you look like a total dick........my source > your opinion.

You cant even read a graph dude. :hello77:

@www.whosnotwinning.com


Global-Primary-Energy-Consumption-by-Source-20211006-1.png
 
I never said that idiot, you just have old rocks in your head and are heading for another brain aneurysm.

Good luck with those voices in your head.

Guy does have voices inside the head........most of the progressives in here have shaky thinking. The only thing keeping me around this forum now for 11 years is being able to highlight the level of k00k in these people.
Ive been cleaning Old Rocks clock for over a decade.:eusa_dance:
 
Virtually every Scientific Society in the world states that AGW is real and a clear and present danger. That you try to pick out climatologists by themselves is simply and indication of your vast ignorance.



Okay. Where is their proof? Just because they claim it doesn't make it true. One thing that was pointed out, and that I checked for myself, is they are all invested in keeping the fraud going.

They make millions of dollars by supporting the claim. Once I found that out I no longer gave them any credibility.
 
LOL.........as usual, all you do in this space is lie your ass off you fool! And every time, I train wreck your ass. After 10 years, arent you sick and tired of being pwn'd time, after time, after time, after time........

With this post, Im making you look like a total dick........my source > your opinion.

You cant even read a graph dude. :hello77:

@www.whosnotwinning.com


View attachment 557016




That is very interesting. Thank you for posting it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top