I see. That is good. You should always be on your guard in these games. I was right to think you would be a good Mafia player, Wolfie.
Non.
No-Lynching is a suitable tactic in very certain situations. The act of doing so, even in the early-game, isn't necessarily Scummy. It may be, WOlfie, that House is a Townie who still has a bit of inexperience. I mean, he's only been playing a few months know. It's been six years for me and I'm still learning subtleties as I go about my business.
In theory yes NL during the early game does deny Town information and isn't recommended for optimal play. The question is whether or not House deserves to be lynched over it and, to that, I must say no. Though if you wish to continue with it I'll abide it, but still question you here and there as you pursue that angle. Personally I think a more pressing matter is Arden's bit about her Role PM although, since we're still in RVS, anything silly goes.
As for me continuously defending House that indicates that there's been more than one occasion that I've done such. In fact regarding me questioning you for voting House for his NL attempt, I don't think that even qualifies as defending him, because in truth I'm more or less wondering over your intent here.
Do you think House has the wherewithal to push through a NL today? I don't.
Anti-Town =/= Scum, so I reason it's not always valid to try and lynch someone for Anti-Town behavior, whether bourne of inexperience or not.
A NL on D1 is bad play and hurts town. There is no town motivation for doing so. So I'm happy with my vote Wake.
You underestimate House at your own peril.
Arden's comment means nothing to me cuz it was in RVS stage and I already gave it the appropriate response. If she pushes it further, she will be lying and then I'll change my vote but for now, there's no reason to vote for her for a silly RVS vote.
Non.
No-Lynching is a suitable tactic in very certain situations. The act of doing so, even in the early-game, isn't necessarily Scummy. It may be, WOlfie, that House is a Townie who still has a bit of inexperience. I mean, he's only been playing a few months know. It's been six years for me and I'm still learning subtleties as I go about my business.
In theory yes NL during the early game does deny Town information and isn't recommended for optimal play. The question is whether or not House deserves to be lynched over it and, to that, I must say no. Though if you wish to continue with it I'll abide it, but still question you here and there as you pursue that angle. Personally I think a more pressing matter is Arden's bit about her Role PM although, since we're still in RVS, anything silly goes.
As for me continuously defending House that indicates that there's been more than one occasion that I've done such. In fact regarding me questioning you for voting House for his NL attempt, I don't think that even qualifies as defending him, because in truth I'm more or less wondering over your intent here.
Do you think House has the wherewithal to push through a NL today? I don't.
Anti-Town =/= Scum, so I reason it's not always valid to try and lynch someone for Anti-Town behavior, whether bourne of inexperience or not.
A NL on D1 is bad play and hurts town. There is no town motivation for doing so. So I'm happy with my vote Wake.
You underestimate House at your own peril.
Arden's comment means nothing to me cuz it was in RVS stage and I already gave it the appropriate response. If she pushes it further, she will be lying and then I'll change my vote but for now, there's no reason to vote for her for a silly RVS vote.
My vote was also done during RVS. Why did you attribute my vote more gravity that Arden's, when hers was predicated on a lie and mine was an obvious non-starter?
House I do not underestimate. I believe he will be far more cautious since the last game we played where we got him.
Do you honestly think you should be moving to take House out so early? While there's not really any Town motivation for doing so I don't see much Scum-motivation for doing something so blatant like that.
If memory serves House's NL was in RVS, too. Hm. Now I'm getting paranoid here.
He already unvoted NL and declared RVS over. Both scum and town will do that so he could be either at this point. It's only one vote. I'm not putting him at L-1 or declaring intent to hammer or anything like that. Just letting him know he hasn't done anything too townie yet.
This supports my theory.
Happy with my vote thus far.
Non.
No-Lynching is a suitable tactic in very certain situations. The act of doing so, even in the early-game, isn't necessarily Scummy. It may be, WOlfie, that House is a Townie who still has a bit of inexperience. I mean, he's only been playing a few months know. It's been six years for me and I'm still learning subtleties as I go about my business.
In theory yes NL during the early game does deny Town information and isn't recommended for optimal play. The question is whether or not House deserves to be lynched over it and, to that, I must say no. Though if you wish to continue with it I'll abide it, but still question you here and there as you pursue that angle. Personally I think a more pressing matter is Arden's bit about her Role PM although, since we're still in RVS, anything silly goes.
As for me continuously defending House that indicates that there's been more than one occasion that I've done such. In fact regarding me questioning you for voting House for his NL attempt, I don't think that even qualifies as defending him, because in truth I'm more or less wondering over your intent here.
Do you think House has the wherewithal to push through a NL today? I don't.
Anti-Town =/= Scum, so I reason it's not always valid to try and lynch someone for Anti-Town behavior, whether bourne of inexperience or not.
A NL on D1 is bad play and hurts town. There is no town motivation for doing so. So I'm happy with my vote Wake.
You underestimate House at your own peril.
Arden's comment means nothing to me cuz it was in RVS stage and I already gave it the appropriate response. If she pushes it further, she will be lying and then I'll change my vote but for now, there's no reason to vote for her for a silly RVS vote.
My vote was also done during RVS. Why did you attribute my vote more gravity that Arden's, when hers was predicated on a lie and mine was an obvious non-starter?
Arden's was a silly RVS vote that means nothing. Your vote advocates a policy that can hurt town. Plus it gets us out of RVS by making a serious vote for a serious reason.
Voting Arden for lying about her role pm would have also ended rvs.
Can't buy this logic.
Can I get a coke,,with ice?
FoS: Arden
I find this posting to be really uninspiring for getting a read.
FoS: Arden
I find this posting to be really uninspiring for getting a read.
I don't know what to make of Arden. In game 6 she was very helpful and quite different, but also had sarcastic posts or playful posts as well. I also tend not to hard read in the first few pages, RVS, etc.,( maybe I should look at it harder though) I do come back to them to see if my scum reads voted for another person I am scum reading though- IIRC it nearly never fails one of them have voted for each other or at least one. Anyway, my point Arden is one of my hard reads, along with Shai and Aye when she plays.
As far as Wake and House. I have no real read on either of them, I am null - was a little iffy on Wake's post-o-rama last night- but went to the main site and see he is erratic like that in a different game, but was town. I have a slight town read on Grandma. And a slight scum read coming from Moon ( reasons in my posts) . I am going back to the main site to read again- which game was it where you and Wake were scum Wolf? I think you said you and he were scum in a game a few posts back.
Wolf, I don't know why you read 'disappointment' I think you put too much of a burden on yourself. When I do my reads which your reference above , go town Wolf type stuff (which I am unsure we can even discuss given Ayes warning in the VC)- So I am going to keep this post in general terms- my reads are not disappointment but reading different meta- please don't take reads personally, okay?
